全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Micropower Impulse Radar: A Novel Technology for Rapid, Real-Time Detection of Pneumothorax

DOI: 10.1155/2011/279508

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Pneumothorax detection in emergency situations must be rapid and at the point of care. Current standards for detection of a pneumothorax are supine chest X-rays, ultrasound, and CT scans. Unfortunately these tools and the personnel necessary for their facile utilization may not be readily available in acute circumstances, particularly those which occur in the pre-hospital setting. The decision to treat therefore, is often made without adequate information. In this report, we describe a novel hand-held device that utilizes Micropower Impulse Radar to reliably detect the presence of a pneumothorax. The technology employs ultra wide band pulses over a frequency range of 500?MHz to 6?GHz and a proprietary algorithm analyzes return echoes to determine if a pneumothorax is present with no user interpretation required. The device has been evaluated in both trauma and surgical environments with sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 85%. It is has the CE Mark and is available for sale in Europe. Post market studies are planned starting in May of 2011. Clinical studies to support the FDA submission will be completed in the first quarter of 2012. 1. Introduction The ability to rapidly identify a pneumothorax (PTX) at the point of care for trauma victims can be life saving. This is particularly true in the military setting where undetected tension PTX is thought to contribute to death in up to 4% of fatal combat cases [1]. Accurate diagnosis of PTX in the prehospital setting depends on physical examination skills which include the ability to look for respiratory distress, jugular venous distension, or tracheal deviation, listen for diminished lung sounds, and feel for crepitus or broken ribs. Detection of such findings however can be challenging [2–4] even when physician providers are involved in patient assessment [5]. Consequently, prehospital protocols often incorporate a low-threshold for intervention when a PTX is suspected clinically [6–10]. Needle decompression, the procedure most commonly performed prehospital for emergent treatment of PTX, is not benign and has the potential to induce substantial morbidity when applied inappropriately [6, 7]. The existence of a quick, practical, easy to use method of diagnosing PTX would greatly improve the margin of error for prehospital providers and facilitate the use of precise, directed intervention for individuals with thoracoabdominal injury. Portable lung ultrasound (US) has high sensitivity and specificity for detection of PTX [11–14] and has been proposed as modality capable of fulfilling this need [15–18].

References

[1]  J. J. McPherson, D. S. Feigin, and R. F. Bellamy, “Prevalence of tension pneumothorax in fatally wounded combat casualties,” The Journal of trauma., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 573–578, 2006.
[2]  A. C. Beekley, B. W. Starnes, and J. A. Sebesta, “Lessons Learned from Modern Military Surgery,” Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 157–184, 2007.
[3]  S. C. Chen, J. F. Markmann, D. R. Kauder, and C. W. Schwab, “Hemopneumothorax missed by auscultation in penetrating chest injury,” Journal of Trauma, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 86–89, 1997.
[4]  R. C. Hunt, D. M. Bryan, V. S. Brinkley, T. W. Whitley, and N. H. Benson, “Inability to assess breath sounds during air medical transport by helicopter,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 265, no. 15, pp. 1982–1984, 1991.
[5]  H. Kirves, L. Handolin, M. Niemel?, J. Pitk?niemi, and T. Randell, “Paramedics' and pre-hospital physicians' assessments of anatomic injury in trauma patients: a cohort study,” Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, vol. 18, no. 1, article 60, 2010.
[6]  E. D. Barton, M. Epperson, D. B. Hoyt, D. Fortlage, and P. Rosen, “Prehospital needle aspiration and tube thoracostomy in trauma victims: a six-year experience with aeromedical crews,” Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 1995.
[7]  D. C. Cullinane, J. A. Morris, J. G. Bass, and E. J. Rutherford, “Needle thoracostomy may not be indicated in the trauma patient,” Injury, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 749–752, 2001.
[8]  C. Jenkins, P. S. Sudheer, and M. Harmer, “Needle thoracocentesis fails to diagnose a large pneumothorax,” Anaesthesia, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 925–926, 2000.
[9]  R. Jones and J. Hollingsworth, “Tension pneumothoraces not responding to needle thoracocentesis,” Emergency Medicine Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 176–177, 2002.
[10]  D. Mines and S. Abbuhl, “Needle thoracostomy fails to detect a fatal tension pneumothorax,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 863–866, 1993.
[11]  M. Blaivas, M. Lyon, and S. Duggal, “A prospective comparison of supine chest radiography and bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax,” Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 844–849, 2005.
[12]  G. Soldati, A. Testa, S. Sher, G. Pignataro, M. La Sala, and N. G. Silveri, “Occult traumatic pneumothorax: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography in the emergency department,” Chest, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 204–211, 2008.
[13]  R. G. Wilkerson and M. B. Stone, “Sensitivity of bedside ultrasound and supine anteroposterior chest radiographs for the identification of pneumothorax after blunt trauma,” Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2010.
[14]  M. Zhang, Z. H. Liu, J. X. Yang et al., “Rapid detection of pneumothorax by ultrasonography in patients with multiple trauma,” Critical Care, vol. 10, no. 4, article R112, 2006.
[15]  J. Roberts, J. McManus, and B. Harrison, “Use of ultrasonography to avoid an unnecessary procedure in the prehospital combat environment: a case report,” Prehospital Emergency Care, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 502–506, 2006.
[16]  A. W. Kirkpatrick, K. Breeck, J. Wong et al., “The potential of handheld trauma sonography in the air medical transport of the trauma victim,” Air Medical Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2005.
[17]  J. J. Madill, “In-Flight thoracic ultrasound detection of pneumothorax in combat,” Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 194–197, 2010.
[18]  S. M. Mazur, A. Pearce, S. Alfred, A. Goudie, and P. Sharley, “The F.A.S.T.E.R. trial. Focused assessment by sonography in trauma during emergency retrieval: a feasibility study,” Injury, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 512–518, 2008.
[19]  A. R. Morgan, W. N. Vasios, D. A. Hubler, and P. J. Benson, “Special operator level clinical ultrasound: an experience in application and training,” Journal of Special Operations Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 16–21, 2010.
[20]  M. A. De Moya, C. Seaver, K. Spaniolas et al., “Occult pneumothorax in trauma patients: development of an objective scoring system,” Journal of Trauma, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2007.
[21]  S. L. Hill, T. Edmisten, G. Holtzman, and A. Wright, “The occult pneumothorax: an increasing diagnostic entity in trauma,” American Surgeon, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 254–258, 1999.
[22]  M. Kaiser, M. Whealon, C. Barrios et al., “The clinical significance of occult thoracic injury in blunt trauma patients,” American Surgeon, vol. 76, no. 10, pp. 1063–1066, 2010.
[23]  D. Plurad, D. Green, D. Demetriades, and P. Rhee, “The increasing use of chest computed tomography for trauma: is it being overutilized?” Journal of Trauma, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 631–635, 2007.
[24]  W. Cai, M. Tabbara, N. Takata et al., “MDCT for automated detection and measurement of pneumothoraces in trauma patients,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 830–836, 2009.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133