全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Robust Wavelet Estimation to Eliminate Simultaneously the Effects of Boundary Problems, Outliers, and Correlated Noise

DOI: 10.1155/2012/963153

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Classical wavelet thresholding methods suffer from boundary problems caused by the application of the wavelet transformations to a finite signal. As a result, large bias at the edges and artificial wiggles occur when the classical boundary assumptions are not satisfied. Although polynomial wavelet regression and local polynomial wavelet regression effectively reduce the risk of this problem, the estimates from these two methods can be easily affected by the presence of correlated noise and outliers, giving inaccurate estimates. This paper introduces two robust methods in which the effects of boundary problems, outliers, and correlated noise are simultaneously taken into account. The proposed methods combine thresholding estimator with either a local polynomial model or a polynomial model using the generalized least squares method instead of the ordinary one. A primary step that involves removing the outlying observations through a statistical function is considered as well. The practical performance of the proposed methods has been evaluated through simulation experiments and real data examples. The results are strong evidence that the proposed method is extremely effective in terms of correcting the boundary bias and eliminating the effects of outliers and correlated noise. 1. Introduction Suppose a noisy data set lives on the fixed design model The classical model (1.1) assumes that the unknown function, , is square integrable on the interval . The sequence is independent and distributed normally with identical means zero and identical variances . Wavelet methods have been intensively used over the last two decades for estimating an unknown function observed in the presence of noise, following the pioneering work presented in the seminal papers of Donoho and Johnstone [1, 2], where the concept of wavelet thresholding was introduced to the statistical literature. Researchers have begun looking at the situation where the usual assumptions are no longer satisfied. When the noise contains a certain amount of structure in the form of a correlation, the variances of the wavelet coefficients will depend on the resolution level of the wavelet decomposition but will be constant at each level. As a result, the global thresholding breaks down because of its great difficulty in providing a global threshold value to threshold wavelet coefficients at all the desired levels. In order to overcome this limitation, Johnstone and Silverman [3] recommended using level by level thresholding, that is, not to use only one thresholding value for all coefficients at all

References

[1]  D. L. Donoho and I. M. Johnstone, “Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage,” Biometrika, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 425–455, 1994.
[2]  D. L. Donoho and I. M. Johnstone, “Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 90, no. 432, pp. 1200–1224, 1995.
[3]  I. M. Johnstone and B. W. Silverman, “Wavelet threshold estimators for data with correlated noise,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 319–351, 1997.
[4]  R. Coifman and D. Donoho, Translation-Invariant de-Noising, vol. 103 of Lecture Notes in Statistics, Springer, 1995.
[5]  A. Kovac and B. Silverman, “Extending the scope of wavelet regression methods by coefficient-dependent thresholding,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 95, pp. 172–183, 2000.
[6]  X. Wang and A. T. A. Wood, “Wavelet estimation of an unknown function observed with correlated noise,” Communications in Statistics, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 287–304, 2010.
[7]  A. Kovac, Wavelet Thresholding for Unequally Spaced Data, University of Bristol, 1998.
[8]  S. Sardy, P. Tseng, and A. Bruce, “Robust wavelet denoising,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 49, pp. 1146–1152, 2001.
[9]  R. Averkamp and C. Houdré, “Wavelet thresholding for non-necessarily Gaussian noise: idealism,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 110–151, 2003.
[10]  G. Wei, T. Jian, and R. Qiu, “Signal denoising via median filter & wavelet shrinkage based on heavy- tailed modeling,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Signal Processing, vol. 1, 2006.
[11]  H.-S. Oh, D. W. Nychka, and T. C. M. Lee, “The role of pseudo data for robust smoothing with application to wavelet regression,” Biometrika, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 893–904, 2007.
[12]  H.-S. Oh, D. Kim, and Y. Kim, “Robust wavelet shrinkage using robust selection of thresholds,” Statistics and Computing, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2009.
[13]  A. M. Altaher and M. T. Ismail, “Robust estimation for boundary correction in wavelet regression,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol. 82, pp. 1531–1544, 2012.
[14]  H.-S. Oh, P. Naveau, and G. Lee, “Polynomial boundary treatment for wavelet regression,” Biometrika, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 291–298, 2001.
[15]  H.-S. Oh and T. C. M. Lee, “Hybrid local polynomial wavelet shrinkage: wavelet regression with automatic boundary adjustment,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 809–819, 2005.
[16]  I. M. Johnstone and B. W. Silverman, “Empirical Bayes selection of wavelet thresholds,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1700–1752, 2005.
[17]  T. C. M. Lee and H.-S. Oh, “Automatic polynomial wavelet regression,” Statistics and Computing, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 337–341, 2004.
[18]  H.-S. Oh and H.-M. Kim, “Bayesian automatic polynomial wavelet regression,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 138, no. 8, pp. 2303–2312, 2008.
[19]  A. M. Altaher and M. Ismail, “Hybrid local polynomial wavelet shrinkage for stationary correlated data,” Informatics Engineering and Information Science, vol. 253, pp. 262–273, 2011.
[20]  D. C. Montgomery, C. L. Jennings, and M. Kulahci, Introduction to Time Series Analysis and Forecasting, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008.
[21]  S. Gelper, R. Fried, and C. Croux, “Robust forecasting with exponential and Holt-Winters smoothing,” Journal of Forecasting, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 285–300, 2010.
[22]  R. H. Shumway and D. S. Stoffer, Time Series Analysis and Its Applications, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2006.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133