全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Influence of Thickness Variation on the Flapping Performance of Symmetric NACA Airfoils in Plunging Motion

DOI: 10.1155/2010/675462

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In order to investigate the impact of airfoil thickness on flapping performance, the unsteady flow fields of a family of airfoils from an NACA0002 airfoil to an NACA0020 airfoil in a pure plunging motion and a series of altered NACA0012 airfoils in a pure plunging motion were simulated using computational fluid dynamics techniques. The “class function/shape function transformation“ parametric method was employed to decide the coordinates of these altered NACA0012 airfoils. Under specified plunging kinematics, it is observed that the increase of an airfoil thickness can reduce the leading edge vortex (LEV) in strength and delay the LEV shedding. The increase of the maximum thickness can enhance the time-averaged thrust coefficient and the propulsive efficiency without lift reduction. As the maximum thickness location moves towards the leading edge, the airfoil obtains a larger time-averaged thrust coefficient and a higher propulsive efficiency without changing the lift coefficient. 1. Introduction Since the Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) was generally defined by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 1997 [1], the Flapping Wing MAV (FWMAV) has been receiving more and more attention from military and civilian application domains. There is therefore an increasing interest to understand the aerodynamics of the flapping wing by experimental and numerical methods [2]. The first researchers who observed the unsteady flow dynamic characteristics of a flapping wing are Knoller [3] and Betz [4], and in the middle of 1930s, von Kármán and Burgers gave a theoretical explanation for the different patterns of a large-scale drag-indicative wake and a thrust-indicative wake [5]. It reinterested fluid scientists and biologists about two decades ago and now is a very active research area. Ellington gave a very comprehensive description of the insect hovering aerodynamics and unsteady aerodynamic effects were highlighted in these good series papers in 1984 [6]. Anderson et al. showed that oscillating foil could have a very high propulsive efficiency, as high as 87%, under specific conditions by water tunnel experiments [7]. Dickinson et al. demonstrated three distinct mechanisms, delayed stall, rotational circulation, and wake capture in enhanced aerodynamic performance of insects using a robotic fly apparatus [8]. To investigate the flow field and effects of flapping parameters on the thrust generation and the propulsive efficiency numerically, an unsteady panel method [9], and Navier-Stokes equations computations [10–15] have been employed during past decade,

References

[1]  J. M. McMichael and M. S. Francis, “Micro air vehicles—toward a new dimension in flight,” DARPA, USA, 1997.
[2]  M. F. Platzer, K. D. Jones, J. Young, and J. C.S. Lai, “Flapping-wing aerodynamics: progress and challenges,” AIAA Journal, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2136–2149, 2008.
[3]  R. Knoller, “Die gesetze des luftwiderstands,” Flug-und Motortechnik, vol. 3, pp. 1–7, 1909.
[4]  A. Betz, “Ein beitrag zur erkl?rung des segelfluges,” Zeitschrift für Flugtechnik und Motorluftschiffahrt, vol. 3, pp. 269–272, 1912.
[5]  T. von Kármán and J. M. Burgers, General Aerodynamic Theory—Perfect Fluids, vol. 2 of Aerodynamic Theory, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 1943.
[6]  C. P. Ellington, “The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight I-VI,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, vol. 305, no. 1122, pp. 1–181, 1984.
[7]  J. M. Anderson, K. Streitlien, D. S. Barrett, and M. S. Triantafyllou, “Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 360, pp. 41–72, 1998.
[8]  M. H. Dickinson, F.-O. Lehmann, and S. P. Sane, “Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect right,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5422, pp. 1954–1960, 1999.
[9]  T. Cebeci, M. Platzer, H. Chen, K. Chang, and J. Shao, Analysis of Low-Speed Unsteady Airfoil Flows, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
[10]  H. Liu, C. P. Ellington, K. Kawachi, C. Van Den Berg, and A. P. Willmott, “A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 201, no. 4, pp. 461–477, 1998.
[11]  I. H. Tuncer and M. Kaya, “Thrust generation caused by flapping airfoils in a biplane configuration,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 509–515, 2003.
[12]  J. H. Wu and M. Sun, “Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 207, no. 7, pp. 1137–1150, 2004.
[13]  Z. J. Wang, “Dissecting insect flight,” in Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 37 of Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, pp. 183–210, Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, Calif, USA, 2005.
[14]  J.-M. Miao and M.-H. Ho, “Effect of flexure on aerodynamic propulsive efficiency of flapping flexible airfoil,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 401–419, 2006.
[15]  J. Young, S. M. Walker, R. J. Bomphrey, G. K. Taylor, and A. L. R. Thomas, “Details of insect wing design and deformation enhance aerodynamic function and flight efficiency,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5947, pp. 1549–1552, 2009.
[16]  W. Shyy, M. Berg, and D. Ljungqvist, “Flapping and flexible wings for biological and micro air vehicles,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 455–505, 1999.
[17]  S. P. Sane, “The aerodynamics of insect flight,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 206, no. 23, pp. 4191–4208, 2003.
[18]  W. Shyy, H. Aono, S. K. Chimakurthi et al., “Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 284–327, 2010.
[19]  I. E. Garrick, “Propulsion of a flapping and oscillating airfoil,” NACA Report 567, 1937.
[20]  M. Sun and J. Tang, “Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 55–70, 2002.
[21]  Z. J. Wang, “Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 323–341, 2000.
[22]  F. M. Bos, D. Lentink, B. W. van Oudheusden, and H. Bijl, “Influence of wing kinematics on aerodynamic performance in hovering insect flight,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 594, pp. 341–368, 2008.
[23]  K. D. Jones and M. F. Platzer, “Numerical computation of flapping-wing propulsion and power extraction,” AIAA paper, AIAA-99-0826, 1999.
[24]  D. Lentink and M. Gerritsma, “Influence of airfoil shape on performance in insect flight,” AIAA paper, AIAA-2003-3447, 2003.
[25]  S. A. Ansari, B. Kevin Knowles, and R. Zbikowski, “Insectlike flapping wings in the hover part 2: effect of wing geometry,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1976–1990, 2008.
[26]  K. D. Jones and M. F. Platzer, “Bio-inspired design of flapping wing micro air vehicles—an engineer's perspective,” in Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, vol. 1, pp. 463–476, Reno, Nev, USA, January 2006.
[27]  T. Kinsey and G. Dumas, “Parametric study of an oscillating airfoil in a power-extraction regime,” AIAA Journal, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1318–1330, 2008.
[28]  J. Moran, An Introduction to Theoretical and Computational Aerodynamics, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
[29]  B. M. Kulfan, “Universal parametric geometry representation method,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 142–158, 2008.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133