Large eddy simulations (LES) based on the Smagorinsky model can be conveniently used in the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) because the strain rate tensor, , used to determine the eddy kinematic viscosity can be calculated from the second-order moment of the nonequilibrium distribution function, and the current total nondimensional relaxation time can be determined explicitly. A new method is developed where the distribution function after the relaxation subroutine differs from that after the motion subroutine leading to a similar method to determine , but its application is inconvenient due to the implicit feature. However, the derivation also leads to an alternative explicit scheme for calculating based on physical analysis of the momentum transport process, where the stress tensor, , is calculated first, and then is determined from using the constitutive relationship for Newtonian fluid. The current total nondimensional relaxation time is also given explicitly so that this LES model can be easily used in the LBM. 1. Introduction The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) [1–3] originated from lattice gas (LG) automata [4–7] can be derived from the Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK) model equation [8] which is a good approximation to the Boltzmann equation. A general rule for systematically formulating LBM models, which are sufficient for the Navier-Stokes, Burnett fluids, and beyond, was given in [9, 10]. In recent years, many improvements have been made to the LBM with the resulting formulations having computational advantages over traditional continuum methods [11–13]. Many successful models have been proposed to extend the scope of LBM applications, including models for incompressible flows [14–16] and flows involving with thermal energy exchange [17–21]. Some sophisticated solid-fluid boundaries are proposed for regular geometries [22, 23], but there are also general boundary-fitted models [24, 25] available. Large eddy simulations (LES) are useful for numerical predictions of complex turbulent flows and its application in LBM is referred to as the LBM-LES algorithm. Among the successful subgrid stress models used in LES [26, 27], the Smagorinsky model [28] in LBM-LES is known to be quite convenient because the needed strain rate tensor can be calculated directly from the second-order moment of the nonequilibrium distribution function. In this paper, the subgrid stress model used in LBM-LES is the Smagorinsky model unless otherwise stated. There are many successful calculations [29–36] of turbulent flows using LBM-LES, and Yu et al. [31] gave a detailed
References
[1]
G. R. McNamara and G. Zanetti, “Use of the Boltzmann equation to simulate lattice-gas automata,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 61, no. 20, pp. 2332–2335, 1988.
[2]
H. Chen, S. Chen, and W. H. Matthaeus, “Recovery of the Navier-Stokes equations using a lattice-gas Boltzmann method,” Physical Review A, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. R5339–R5342, 1992.
[3]
Y. H. Qian, D. d’Humieres, and P. Lallemand, “Lattice BGK models for Navier-Stokes equation,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 479–484, 1992.
[4]
U. Frisch, B. Hasslacher, and Y. Pomeau, “Lattice-gas automata for the Navier-Stokes equation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 56, no. 14, pp. 1505–1508, 1986.
[5]
S. Wolfram, “Cellular automaton fluids 1: basic theory,” Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 471–526, 1986.
[6]
U. Frisch, D. d’Humieres, B. Hasslacher, P. Lallemand, Y. Pomeau, and J.-P. Rivet, “Lattice gas hydrodynamics in two and three dimensions,” Complex Systems, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 649–707, 1987.
[7]
D. Montgomery and G. D. Doolen, “Magnetohydrodynamic cellular automata,” Physics Letters A, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 229–231, 1987.
[8]
P. L. Bhatnagar, E. P. Gross, and M. Krook, “A model for collision processes in gases. I. Small amplitude processes in charged and neutral one-component systems,” Physical Review, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 511–525, 1954.
[9]
X. Shan, X. F. Yuan, and H. Chen, “Kinetic theory representation of hydrodynamics: a way beyond the Navier-Stokes equation,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 550, pp. 413–441, 2006.
[10]
H. Chen and X. Shan, “Fundamental conditions for -th-order accurate lattice Boltzmann models,” Physica D, vol. 237, no. 14–17, pp. 2003–2008, 2008.
[11]
R. Benzi, S. Succi, and M. Vergassola, “The lattice Boltzmann equation: theory and applications,” Physics Report, vol. 222, no. 3, pp. 145–197, 1992.
[12]
S. Chen and G. D. Doolen, “Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid flows,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 30, pp. 329–364, 1998.
[13]
D. Yu, R. Mei, L. S. Luo, and W. Shyy, “Viscous flow computations with the method of lattice Boltzmann equation,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 329–367, 2003.
[14]
Q. Zou, S. Hou, S. Chen, and G. D. Doolen, “A improved incompressible lattice Boltzmann model for time-independent flows,” Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 81, no. 1-2, pp. 35–48, 1995.
[15]
X. He and L. S. Luo, “Lattice Boltzmann model for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation,” Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 88, no. 3-4, pp. 927–944, 1997.
[16]
Z. Guo, B. Shi, and N. Wang, “Lattice BGK model for incompressible Navier-Stokes equation,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 288–306, 2000.
[17]
X. Shan and H. Chen, “Lattice Boltzmann model for simulating flows with multiple phases and components,” Physical Review E, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1815–1819, 1993.
[18]
X. He, S. Chen, and G. D. Doolen, “A novel thermal model for the lattice Boltzmann method in incompressible limit,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 282–300, 1998.
[19]
Z. Guo, B. Shi, and C. Zheng, “A coupled lattice BGK model for the Boussinesq equations,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 325–342, 2002.
[20]
Z. Guo, C. Zheng, B. Shi, and T. S. Zhao, “Thermal lattice Boltzmann equation for low Mach number flows: decoupling model,” Physical Review E, vol. 75, no. 3, Article ID 036704, 2007.
[21]
Q. Li, Y. L. He, Y. Wang, and G. H. Tang, “An improved thermal lattice Boltzmann model for flows without viscous heat dissipation and compression work,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 125–150, 2008.
[22]
P. A. Skordos, “Initial and boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann method,” Physical Review E, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 4823–4842, 1993.
[23]
D. R. Noble, S. Chen, J. G. Georgiadis, and R. O. Buckius, “A consistent hydrodynamic boundary condition for the lattice Boltzmann method,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 203–209, 1995.
[24]
O. Filippova and D. H?nel, “Boundary-fitting and local grid refinement for lattice-BGK models,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1271–1279, 1998.
[25]
H. Chen, C. Teixeira, and K. Molvig, “Realization of fluid boundary conditions via discrete Boltzmann dynamics,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1281–1292, 1998.
[26]
G. X. Cui, C. X. Xu, L. Fang, L. Shao, and Z. S. Zhang, “A new subgrid eddy-viscosity model for large-eddy simulation of anisotropic turbulence,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 582, pp. 377–397, 2007.
[27]
Z. S. Zhang, G. X. Cui, and C. X. Xu, The Theory and Application of Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulence, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China, 2008.
[28]
J. Smagorinsky, “General circulation experiments with primitive equation,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 91, pp. 99–164, 1963.
[29]
S. Hou, J. Sterling, S. Chen, and G. D. Doolen, “A lattice Boltzmann subgrid model for high Reynolds number flows,” in Pattern Formation and Lattice Gas Automata, vol. 6 of Fields Institute Communications, pp. 151–166, 1996.
[30]
M. Krafczyk, J. T?lke, and L. S. Luo, “Large-eddy simulations with a multiple-relaxation-time LBE model,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 17, no. 1-2, pp. 33–39, 2003.
[31]
H. Yu, S. S. Girimaji, and L. S. Luo, “DNS and LES of decaying isotropic turbulence with and without frame rotation using lattice Boltzmann method,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 599–616, 2005.
[32]
Y. H. Dong and P. Sagaut, “A study of time correlations in lattice Boltzmann-based large-eddy simulation of isotropic turbulence,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 20, no. 3, Article ID 035105, 2008.
[33]
K. N. Premnath, M. J. Pattison, and S. Banerjee, “Generalized lattice Boltzmann equation with forcing term for computation of wall-bounded turbulent flows,” Physical Review E, vol. 79, no. 2, Article ID 026703, 2009.
[34]
G. Vahala, B. Keating, M. Soe, J. Yepez, L. Vahala, and S. Ziegeler, “Entropic, LES and boundary conditions in lattice Boltzmann simulations of turbulence,” European Physical Journal, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 167–171, 2009.
[35]
P. Sagaut, “Toward advanced subgrid models for Lattice-Boltzmann-based Large-eddy simulation: theoretical formulations,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 2194–2199, 2010.
[36]
K. N. Premnath, M. J. Pattison, and S. Banerjee, “Dynamic subgrid scale modeling of turbulent flows using lattice-Boltzmann method,” Physica A, vol. 388, no. 13, pp. 2640–2658, 2009.
[37]
S. Chapman and T. G. Cowling, The Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Gases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 3rd edition, 1970.
[38]
L. Q. Tang, T. Cheng, and T. T. H. Tsang, “Transient solutions for three-dimensional lid-driven cavity flows by a least-squares finite element method,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 413–432, 1995.
[39]
S. Hou, Lattice Boltzmann method for incompressible viscous flow, Ph.D. thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kan, USA, 1995.