We give a new class of augmented Lagrangian functions for nonlinear programming problem with both equality and inequality constraints. The close relationship between local saddle points of this new augmented Lagrangian and local optimal solutions is discussed. In particular, we show that a local saddle point is a local optimal solution and the converse is also true under rather mild conditions. 1. Introduction Consider the nonlinear optimization problem where , for and for are twice continuously differentiable functions and is a nonempty closed subset. The classical Lagrangian function associated with ( ) is defined as where and . The Lagrangian dual problem ( ) is presented: where Lagrange multiplier theory not only plays a key role in many issues of mathematical programming such as sensitivity analysis, optimality conditions, and numerical algorithms, but also has important applications, for example, in scheduling, resource allocation, engineering design, and matching problems. According to both analysis and experiments, it performs substantially better than classical methods for solving some engineering projects, especially for medium-sized or large projects. Roughly speaking, the augmented Lagrangian method uses a sequence of iterate point of unconstrained optimization problems, which are constructed by utilizing the Lagrangian multipliers, to approximate the optimal solution of the original problem. Toward this end, we must ensure that the zero dual gap property holds between primal and dual problems. Therefore, saddle point theory received much attention, due to its equivalence with zero dual gap property. It is well known that, for convex programming problems, the zero dual gap holds by using the above classical Lagrangian function. However, the nonzero duality gap may appear for nonconvex optimization problems. The main reason is that the classical Lagrangian function is linear with respect to the Lagrangian multiplier. To overcome this drawback, various types of nonlinear Lagrangian functions and augmented Lagrangian functions have been developed in recent years. For example, Hestenes [1] and Powell [2] independently proposed augmented Lagrangian methods for solving equality constrained problems by incorporating the quadratic penalty term in the classical Lagrangian function. This was extended by Rockafellar [3] to the constrained optimization problem with both equality and inequality constraints. A convex augmented function and the corresponding augmented Lagrangian with zero duality gap property were introduced by Rockafellar and Wets in [4].
References
[1]
M. R. Hestenes, “Multiplier and gradient methods,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 4, pp. 303–320, 1969.
[2]
M. J. D. Powell, “A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems,” in Optimization, R. Fletcher, Ed., pp. 283–298, Academic Press, London, UK, 1969.
[3]
R. T. Rockafellar, “Augmented Lagrange multiplier functions and duality in nonconvex programming,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 12, pp. 268–285, 1974.
[4]
R. T. Rockafellar and R. J.-B. Wets, Variational Analysis, vol. 317 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1998.
[5]
X. X. Huang and X. Q. Yang, “A unified augmented Lagrangian approach to duality and exact penalization,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 533–552, 2003.
[6]
Q. Liu, W. M. Tang, and X. M. Yang, “Properties of saddle points for generalized augmented Lagrangian,” Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 111–124, 2009.
[7]
C. Wang, J. Zhou, and X. Xu, “Saddle points theory of two classes of augmented Lagrangians and its applications to generalized semi-infinite programming,” Applied Mathematics and Optimization, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 413–434, 2009.
[8]
A. Ben-tal and M. Zibulevsky, “Penalty/barrier multiplier methods for convex programming problems,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 347–366, 1997.
[9]
D. P. Bertsekas, Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods, Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1982.
[10]
X. X. Huang and X. Q. Yang, “Approximate optimal solutions and nonlinear Lagrangian functions,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 51–65, 2001.
[11]
X. X. Huang and X. Q. Yang, “Further study on augmented Lagrangian duality theory,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 193–210, 2005.
[12]
E. Polak and J. O. Royset, “On the use of augmented Lagrangians in the solution of generalized semi-infinite min-max problems,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 173–192, 2005.
[13]
R. Polyak, “Modified barrier functions: theory and methods,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 177–222, 1992.
[14]
A. Rubinov and X. Yang, Lagrange-Type Functions in Constrained Non-Convex Optimization, vol. 85 of Applied Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 2003.
[15]
P. Tseng and D. P. Bertsekas, “On the convergence of the exponential multiplier method for convex programming,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 1993.
[16]
Y. Y. Zhou and X. Q. Yang, “Augmented Lagrangian function, non-quadratic growth condition and exact penalization,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 127–134, 2006.
[17]
D. Li, “Zero duality gap for a class of nonconvex optimization problems,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 309–324, 1995.
[18]
D. Li, “Saddle point generation in nonlinear nonconvex optimization,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 4339–4344, 1997.
[19]
D. Li and X. L. Sun, “Existence of a saddle point in nonconvex constrained optimization,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2001.
[20]
D. Li and X. L. Sun, “Convexification and existence of a saddle point in a pth-power reformulation for nonconvex constrained optimization,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 5611–5622, 2001.
[21]
X. L. Sun, D. Li, and K. I. M. McKinnon, “On saddle points of augmented Lagrangians for constrained nonconvex optimization,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1128–1146, 2005.