Earthworms are responsible for soil development, recycling organic matter and form a vital component within many food webs. For these and other reasons earthworms are worthy of investigation. Many technologically-enhanced approaches have been used within earthworm-focused research. These have their place, may be a development of existing practices or bring techniques from other fields. Nevertheless, let us not overlook the fact that much can still be learned through utilisation of more basic approaches which have been used for some time. New does not always equate to better. Information on community composition within an area and specific population densities can be learned using simple collection techniques, and burrowing behaviour can be determined from pits, resin-insertion or simple mesocosms. Life history studies can be achieved through maintenance of relatively simple cultures. Behavioural observations can be undertaken by direct observation or with low cost webcam usage. Applied aspects of earthworm research can also be achieved through use of simple techniques to enhance population development and even population dynamics can be directly addressed with use of relatively inexpensive, effective marking techniques. This paper seeks to demonstrate that good quality research in this sphere can result from appropriate application of relatively simple research tools. 1. Introduction There is no need to make a case for studying earthworms, as their role within the soil has been recognized for more than a century [1]. Collectively, these organisms are able to pass vast quantities of soil through their guts and by doing so bring about the creation of an improved crumb structure which incorporates mineral and organic elements and can become a seedbed for plant growth [2]. In addition, earthworms may aerate soils and increase water infiltration, hence reducing soil erosion, by burrow creation [3]. On top of all this some species are more highly regarded as they are attributed with ecosystem engineering capabilities; that is, they are able to directly influence the environment around themselves and the availability of resources to other organisms [4]. Many avenues of research are available and this article could very easily seek to review and critique some of the more advanced techniques currently in use within the sphere of earthworm ecology. These might include DNA-related work examining the genome of selected species [12]; ecotoxicology, following the accumulation of, for example, heavy metals in the tissues of earthworms on contaminated land [13]; or,
References
[1]
C. R. Darwin, The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms with Some Observations on Their Habits, John Murray, London, UK, 1881.
[2]
C. A. Edwards and P. J. Bohlen, Biology and Ecology of Earthworms, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 3rd edition, 1996.
[3]
M. J. Shipitalo, V. Nuutinen, and K. R. Butt, “Interaction of earthworm burrows and cracks in a clayey, subsurface-drained, soil,” Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 209–217, 2004.
[4]
C. G. Jones, J. H. Lawton, and M. Shachak, “Organisms as ecosystem engineers,” Oikos, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 373–386, 1994.
[5]
K. R. Butt and N. Grigoropoulou, “Earthworms from aughton woods: an ancient woodland in lancashire,” Unpublished Report, The Wildlife Trust for Lancashire, Manchester and North Merseyside, March 2009, (Ref: WT09).
[6]
K. R. Butt and C. N. Lowe, “Earthworms at mere sands wood nature reserve,” Unpublished Report, The Wildlife Trust for Lancashire, Manchester and North Merseyside, October 2002, (Ref: CWEM3).
[7]
K. R. Butt and J. Kostecka, “The earthworms of wistman's wood, dartmoor,” Bulletin of the Devon Invertebrate Forum, vol. 7, pp. 13–17, 2001.
[8]
K. R. Butt, C. N. Lowe, T. Beasley, I. Hanson, and R. Keynes, “Darwin's earthworms revisited,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 255–259, 2008.
[9]
K. R. Butt and C. N. Lowe, “Anthropic influences on earthworm distribution, Isle of Rum National Nature Reserve, Scotland,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 63–72, 2004.
[10]
K. R. Butt, “Earthworms of the Malham Tarn Estate (Yorkshire Dales National Park),” Field Studies, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 701–710, 2000.
[11]
K. R. Butt and C. N. Lowe, “Earthworms of the newton rigg estate,” Unpublished Report, University of Cumbria, June 2009, (Ref ENRC 6/09).
[12]
S. R. Stürzenbaum, J. Andre, P. Kille, and A. J. Morgan, “Earthworm genomes, genes and proteins: the (re)discovery of Darwin's worms,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 276, no. 1658, pp. 789–797, 2009.
[13]
C. J. Langdon, A. J. Morgan, J. M. Charnock, K. T. Semple, and C. N. Lowe, “As-resistance in laboratory-reared F1, F2 and F3 generation offspring of the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus inhabiting an As-contaminated mine soil,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 157, no. 11, pp. 3114–3119, 2009.
[14]
M. J. I. Briones, R. Bol, D. Sleep, D. Allen, and L. Sampedro, “Spatio-temporal variation of stable isotope ratios in earthworms under grassland and maize cropping systems,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 33, no. 12-13, pp. 1673–1682, 2001.
[15]
ISO 23611-1, “Soil quality—sampling of soil invertebrates—part 1: hand-sorting and formalin extraction of earthworms,” ISO 23611-1, 2006.
[16]
E. Eichinger, A. Bruckner, and M. Stemmer, “Earthworm expulsion by formalin has severe and lasting side effects on soil biota and plants,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 260–266, 2007.
[17]
A. Gunn, “The use of mustard to estimate earthworm populations,” Pedobiologia, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 65–67, 1992.
[18]
A. P. Lawrence and M. A. Bowers, “A test of the ‘hot’ mustard extraction method of sampling earthworms,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 549–552, 2002.
[19]
E. R. Zaborski, “Allyl isothiocyanate: an alternative chemical expellant for sampling earthworms,” Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 2003.
[20]
C. Pelosi, M. Bertrand, Y. Capowiez, H. Boizard, and J. Roger-Estrade, “Earthworm collection from agricultural fields: comparisons of selected expellants in presence/absence of hand-sorting,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 176–183, 2009.
[21]
N. Eisenhauer, D. Straube, and S. Scheu, “Efficiency of two widespread non-destructive extraction methods under dry soil conditions for different ecological earthworm groups,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 141–145, 2008.
[22]
J. M. Blair, R. W. Parmelee, M. F. Allen, D. A. McCartney, and B. R. Stinner, “Changes in soil N pools in response to earthworm population manipulations in agroecosystems with different N sources,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 29, no. 3-4, pp. 361–367, 1997.
[23]
S. L. Lachnicht, R. W. Parmelee, D. Mccartney, and M. Allen, “Characteristics of macroporosity in a reduced tillage agroecosystem with manipulated earthworm populations: implications for infiltration and nutrient transport,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 29, no. 3-4, pp. 493–498, 1997.
[24]
N. Grigoropoulou and K. R. Butt, “Field investigations of Lumbricus terrestris spatial distribution and dispersal through monitoring of manipulated, enclosed plots,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 2010.
[25]
A. C. Evans and W. J. Mc. L. Guild, “Studies on the relationships between earthworms and soil fertility. I. Biological studies in the field,” Annals of Applied Biology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 307–330, 1947.
[26]
K. R. Butt, J. Frederickson, and R. M. Morris, “The Earthworm Inoculation Unit technique: an integrated system for cultivation and soil-inoculation of earthworms,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 29, no. 3-4, pp. 251–257, 1997.
[27]
K. R. Butt, C. N. Lowe, J. Frederickson, and A. J. Moffat, “The development of sustainable earthworm populations at Calvert Landfill Site, UK,” Land Degradation & Development, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2004.
[28]
K. R. Butt and V. Nuutinen, “The dawn of the dew worm,” Biologist, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 218–223, 2005.
[29]
K. R. Butt and C. N. Lowe, “Presence of earthworm species within and beneath Lumbricus terrestris (L.) middens,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 43, supplement 1, pp. S57–S60, 2007.
[30]
M. J. Shipitalo and K. R. Butt, “Occupancy and geometrical properties of Lumbricus terrestris L. burrows affecting infiltration,” Pedobiologia, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 782–794, 1999.
[31]
V. Nuutinen and K. R. Butt, “Interaction of Lumbricus terrestris L. burrows with field subdrains,” Pedobiologia, vol. 47, no. 5-6, pp. 578–581, 2003.
[32]
V. Nuutinen and K. R. Butt, “Worms from the cold: lumbricid life stages in boreal clay during frost,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1580–1582, 2009.
[33]
A. C. Evans, “Method of studying the burrowing activity of earthworms,” Annual Magazine of Natural History, vol. 11, pp. 643–650, 1947.
[34]
N. Grigoropoulou, K. R. Butt, and C. N. Lowe, “Effects of adult Lumbricus terrestris on cocoons and hatchlings in Evans' boxes,” Pedobiologia, vol. 51, no. 5-6, pp. 343–349, 2008.
[35]
M. Joschko, O. Graff, P. C. Müller, et al., “A non-destructive method for the morphological assessment of earthworm burrow systems in three dimensions by X-ray computed tomography,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 88–92, 1991.
[36]
J. H. Lawton, “The ecotron facility at silwood park: the value of “Big Bottle” experiments,” Ecology, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 665–669, 1996.
[37]
S. Naeem, J. H. Lawton, L. J. Thompson, S. P. Lawler, and R. M. Woodfin, “Biotic diversity and ecosystem processes: using the Ecotron to study a complex relationship,” Endeavour, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 58–63, 1995.
[38]
L. ？ernosvitov and A. C. Evans, Lumbricidae (Annelida). With a Key to the Common Species, Synopses of the British Fauna, no. 6, The Linnean Society of London, London, UK, 1947.
[39]
R. W. Sims and B. M. Gerard, Earthworms. Notes for Identification of British Species, R. S. K. Barnes and J. H. Crothers, Eds. Synopses of the British Fauna, no. 31, Linnean Society of London and the Estuarine and Coastal sciences Association, 1999.
[40]
C. N. Lowe and K. R. Butt, “Culture techniques for soil dwelling earthworms: a review,” Pedobiologia, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 401–413, 2005.
[41]
K. R. Butt, “Depth of cocoon deposition by three earthworm species in mesocosms,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 151–153, 2002.
[42]
K. R. Butt, J. Frederickson, and R. M. Morris, “Effect of earthworm density on the growth and reproduction of Lumbricus terrestris L. (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae) in culture,” Pedobiologia, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 254–261, 1994.
[43]
K. R. Butt, “Interactions between selected earthworm species: a preliminary, laboratory-based study,” Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 9, no. 1–3, pp. 75–79, 1998.
[44]
K. R. Butt, “The effects of temperature on the intensive production of Lumbricus terrestris L. (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae),” Pedobiologia, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 257–264, 1991.
[45]
K. R. Butt and C. N. Lowe, “A viable technique for tagging earthworms using visible implant elastomer,” Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 454–457, 2007.
[46]
Northwest Marine Technology, June 2009, http://www.nmt.us/products/vie/vie.htm.
[47]
K. R. Butt, M. J. I. Briones, and C. N. Lowe, “Is tagging with visual implant elastomer a reliable technique for marking earthworms?” Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira. In press.
[48]
V. Nuutinen, M. Nieminen, and K. R. Butt, “Introducing deep burrowing earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris L.) into arable heavy clay under boreal conditions,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 42, supplement 1, pp. S269–S274, 2006.
[49]
J. G. Mather and O. Christensen, “Surface movements of earthworms in agricultural land,” Pedobiologia, vol. 32, no. 5-6, pp. 399–405, 1988.
[50]
C. A. Edwards and G. W. Heath, “The role of soil animals in breakdown of leaf material,” in Soil Organisms, J. Doekson and J. van de Drift, Eds., pp. 76–84, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1963.
[51]
B. M. Doube, O. Schmidt, K. Killham, and R. Correll, “Influence of mineral soil on the palatability of organic matter for lumbricid earthworms: a simple food preference study,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 29, no. 3-4, pp. 569–575, 1997.
[52]
K. R. Butt, M. A. Nieminen, T. Sirén, E. Ketoja, and V. Nuutinen, “Population and behavioural level responses of arable soil earthworms to boardmill sludge application,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 163–167, 2005.
[53]
V. Nuutinen and K. R. Butt, “The mating behaviour of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris L. (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae),” Journal of Zoology, vol. 242, pp. 783–798, 1997.
[54]
N. K. Michiels, A. Hohner, and I. C. Vorndran, “Precopulatory mate assessment in relation to body size in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris: avoidance of dangerous liaisons?” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 612–618, 2001.
[55]
J. Valckx, A. Pennings, G. Govers, M. Hermy, and B. Muys, “Dispersal of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris L., in an experimental setup,” in Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Soil Zooolgy, Curitiba, Brazil, September 2008.
[56]
G. H. Baker, G. Brown, K. Butt, J. P. Curry, and J. Scullion, “Introduced earthworms in agricultural and reclaimed land: their ecology and influences on soil properties, plant production and other soil biota,” Biological Invasions, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1301–1316, 2006.
[57]
J. P. Curry, “The Ecology of Earthworms in reclaimed soils and their influence on soil fertility,” in Earthworms in Waste and Environmental Management, C. A. Edwards and E. F. Neuhauser, Eds., pp. 251–261, SPB Academic, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1988.
