全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Charles Darwin's Observations on the Behaviour of Earthworms and the Evolutionary History of a Giant Endemic Species from Germany, Lumbricus badensis (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae)

DOI: 10.1155/2010/823047

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The British naturalist Charles Darwin (1809–1882) began and ended his almost 45-year-long career with observations, experiments, and theories related to earthworms. About six months before his death, Darwin published his book on The Formation of Vegetable Mould, through the Actions of Worms, With Observations on their Habits (1881). Here we describe the origin, content, and impact of Darwin's last publication on earthworms (subclass Oligochaeta, family Lumbricidae) and the role of these annelids as global “ecosystem reworkers” (concept of bioturbation). In addition, we summarize our current knowledge on the reproductive behaviour of the common European species Lumbricus terrestris. In the second part of our account we describe the biology and evolution of the giant endemic species L. badensis from south western Germany with reference to the principle of niche construction. Biogeographic studies have shown that the last common ancestor of L. badensis, and the much smaller sister-taxon, the Atlantic-Mediterranean L. friendi, lived less than 10?000 years ago. Allopatric speciation occurred via geographically isolated founder populations that were separated by the river Rhine so that today two earthworm species exist in different areas. 1. Introduction In his Autobiography, Charles Darwin (1809–1882) briefly commented on his last major publication in the following words: “I have now (May 1, 1881) sent to the printers the MS. of a little book on The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Actions of Worms. This is a subject of but small importance; and I know not whether it will interest any readers, but it has interested me. It is the completion of a short paper read before the Geological Society more than forty years ago, and has revived old geological thoughts” [1, page 136]. In a foot-note on the same page, Darwin's son Francis (1848–1925), who edited the letters as well as other documents after his father's death, remarked that “between November 1881 and February 1884, 8,500 copies were sold.” Charles Darwin's “little book” [2] later gave rise to the scientific concept of “bioturbation”, which can be defined as “the biological reworking of soils and sediments by all kinds of organisms, including microbes, rooting plants and burrowing animals” [3]. These ongoing activities of different soil (or sediment) organisms, which leads to a modification of geochemical gradients and the redistribution of organic substances, can be viewed as a kind of “ecosystem engineering.” Moreover, it is obvious that soil texture is modified and different soil particles are

References

[1]  N. Barlow, Ed., The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, Collins St. James's Place, London, UK, 1858.
[2]  C. Darwin, The Formation of Vegetable Mould, through the Actions of Worms, with Observations on Their Habits, John Murray, London, UK, 1881.
[3]  F. J. R. Meysman, J. J. Middelburg, and C. H. R. Heip, “Bioturbation: a fresh look at Darwin's last idea,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 688–695, 2006.
[4]  C. Darwin, “On the formation of mould,” Proceedings of the Geological Society of London, vol. 2, pp. 574–576, 1838.
[5]  A. Desmond and J. Moore, Darwin, Penguin Books, London, UK, 1992.
[6]  C. Darwin, “On the formation of mould,” Transactions of the Geological Society of London, pp. 505–509, 1840.
[7]  C. Darwin, “On the origin of mould,” Gardener's Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette, vol. 14, p. 218, 1844.
[8]  C. Darwin, “The formation of mould by worms,” Gardener's Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette, vol. 20, p. 530, 1869.
[9]  D. L. Johnson, “Darwin would be proud: bioturbation, dynamic denudation, and the power of theory in science,” Geoarchaeology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7–40, 2002.
[10]  G. G. Brown, C. Feller, E. Blanchart, P. Deleporte, and S. S. Chernyanskii, “With Darwin, earthworms turn intelligent and become human friends,” Pedobiologia, vol. 47, no. 5-6, pp. 924–933, 2003.
[11]  C. A. Edwards and P. J. Bohlen, Biology and Ecology of Earthworms, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1996.
[12]  D. H. Erwin, “Macroevolution of ecosystem engineering, niche construction and diversity,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 304–310, 2008.
[13]  C. Feller, G. G. Brown, E. Blanchart, P. Deleporte, and S. S. Chernyanskii, “Charles Darwin, earthworms and the natural sciences: various lessons from past to future,” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 99, no. 1–3, pp. 29–49, 2003.
[14]  J. E. Satchell, “Lumbricidae,” in Soil Biology, A. Burgess and F. Raw, Eds., pp. 259–322, Academic Press, London, UK, 1967.
[15]  M. H. B. Hayes, ““Darwin's vegetable mould” and some modern concepts of humus structure and soil aggregation,” in Earthworm Ecology: From Darwin to Vermiculture, J. E. Satchell, Ed., pp. 19–33, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1983.
[16]  V. V. Pop, “Earthworm biology and ecology—a case study: the genus Octodrilus Omodeo, 1956 (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae), from the Carpathians,” in Earthworm Ecology, C. A. Edwards, Ed., pp. 65–100, St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1998.
[17]  B. Jonsson, T. Forseth, and O. Ugedal, “Chernobyl radioactivity persists in fish,” Nature, vol. 400, no. 6743, p. 417, 1999.
[18]  J. T. Smith, S. V. Fesenko, B. J. Howard, et al., “Temporal change in fallout in terrestrial and aquatic systems: a whole ecosystem approach,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 1999.
[19]  J. T. Smith, R. N. J. Comans, N. A. Beresford, S. M. Wright, B. J. Howard, and W. C. Camplin, “Pollution: Chernobyl's legacy in food and water,” Nature, vol. 405, no. 6783, p. 141, 2000.
[20]  J. M. Elliott, J. Hilton, E. Rigg, P. A. Tullett, D. J. Swift, and D. R. P. Leonard, “Sources of variation in post-Chernobyl radiocaesium in fish from two Cumbrian lakes (Northwest England),” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 108–119, 1992.
[21]  J. M. Elliott, J. A. Elliott, and J. Hilton, “Sources of variation in post-Chernobyl radiocaesium in brown trout, Salmo trutta L., and Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus L., from six Cumbrian lakes (Northwest England),” Annales de Limnologie, vol. 29, pp. 79–98, 1993.
[22]  V. Rousset, F. Pleijel, G. W. Rouse, C. Erséus, and M. E. Siddall, “A molecular phylogeny of annelids,” Cladistics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 41–63, 2007.
[23]  J. M. Elliott and K. H. Mann, “A key to the British freshwater leeches with notes on their life cycles and ecology,” Scientific Publications of the Freshwater Biological Association, vol. 40, pp. 1–72, 1979.
[24]  U. Kutschera and P. Wirtz, “The evolution of parental care in freshwater leeches,” Theory in Biosciences, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 115–137, 2001.
[25]  U. Kutschera, I. Pfeiffer, and E. Ebermann, “The European land leech: biology and DNA-based taxonomy of a rare species that is threatened by climate warming,” Naturwissenschaften, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 967–974, 2007.
[26]  J. M. Elliott, “Population size, weight distribution and food in a persistent population of the rare medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis,” Freshwater Biology, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1502–1512, 2008.
[27]  C. Darwin, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, John Murray, London, UK, 1859.
[28]  S. Rose, Ed., The Richness of Life: The Essential Stephen Jay Gould, W. W. Norton, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
[29]  R. W. Sims and B. M. Gerard, Earthworms. Synopsis of the British Fauna No. 31, Linnaean Society, London, UK, 1985.
[30]  U. Kutschera and K. J. Niklas, “The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis,” Naturwissenschaften, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 255–276, 2004.
[31]  A. J. Grove, “On the reproductive processes of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris,” Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Sciences, vol. 69, pp. 245–291, 1925.
[32]  V. Nuutinen and K. R. Butt, “The mating behaviour of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae),” Journal of Zoology, vol. 242, no. 4, pp. 783–798, 1997.
[33]  N. K. Michiels, A. Hohner, and I. C. Vorndran, “Precopulatory mate assessment in relation to body size in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris: avoidance of dangerous liaisons?” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 612–618, 2001.
[34]  W. Michaelsen, “Zur Kenntnis der deutschen Lumbricidenfauna,” Mitteilungen des Naturhistorischen Museums Hamburg, vol. 24, pp. 1–191, 1907.
[35]  F. Lamparski, “Der Einflu? der Regenwurmart Lumbricus badensis auf Waldb?den im Südschwarzwald,” Freiburger Bodenkundliche Abhandlungen, vol. 15, 1985.
[36]  K. Riexinger, “Ein Regenwurm der Superlative,” Der Sonntag in Freiburg, vol. 2, p. 3, 1999.
[37]  A. Kobel-Lamparsky and F. Lamparsky, “Burrow constructions during the development of Lumbricus badensis individuals,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 3, pp. 125–129, 1987.
[38]  M. J. Telford, “A single origin of the central nervous system?” Cell, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 237–239, 2007.
[39]  G. Osche, “Der Riesenregenwurm (Lumbricus badensis) des Südschwarzwaldes,” Der Feldberg im Schwarzwald. Natur- und Landschaftsschutzgebiete Baden-Württembergs, vol. 12, pp. 394–396, 1982.
[40]  U. Kutschera, “Species concepts: leeches versus bacteria,” Lauterbornia, vol. 52, pp. 171–175, 2004.
[41]  M. Wikelski, “Evolution of body size in Galapagos marine iguanas,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 272, no. 1576, pp. 1985–1993, 2005.
[42]  A. C. Evans, “A method of studying the burrowing activities of earthworms,” Annals Magazine Natural History, vol. 14, pp. 643–650, 1947.
[43]  U. Kutschera, “Struggle to translate Darwin's view of concurrency,” Nature, vol. 458, no. 7241, p. 967, 2009.
[44]  O. Seehausen, “Ecology: speciation affects ecosystems,” Nature, vol. 458, no. 7242, pp. 1122–1123, 2009.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133