全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PeerJ  2015 

Compliance with vessel speed restrictions to protect North Atlantic right whales

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.399

Keywords: Regulatory compliance,Vessel collisions,Ship strikes,Endangered whales,Remote monitoring,Large whale conservation,Vessel operations

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Environmental regulations can only be effective if they are adhered to, but the motivations for regulatory compliance are not always clear. We assessed vessel operator compliance with a December 2008 regulation aimed at reducing collisions with the endangered North Atlantic right whale that requires vessels 65 feet or greater in length to travel at speeds of 10 knots or less at prescribed times and locations along the U.S. eastern seaboard. Extensive outreach efforts were undertaken to notify affected entities both before and after the regulation went into effect. Vessel speeds of 201,862 trips made between November 2008 and August 2013 by 8,009 individual vessels were quantified remotely, constituting a nearly complete census of transits made by the regulated population. Of these, 437 vessels (or their parent companies), some of whom had been observed exceeding the speed limit, were contacted through one of four non-punitive information programs. A fraction (n = 26 vessels/companies) received citations and fines. Despite the efforts to inform mariners, initial compliance was low (<5% of the trips were completely <10 knots) but improved in the latter part of the study. Each notification/enforcement program improved compliance to some degree and some may have influenced compliance across the entire regulated community. Citations/fines appeared to have the greatest influence on improving compliance in notified vessels/companies, followed in order of effectiveness by enforcement-office information letters, monthly summaries of vessel operations, and direct at-sea radio contact. Trips by cargo vessels exhibited the greatest change in behavior followed by tanker and passenger vessels. These results have application to other regulatory systems, especially where remote monitoring is feasible, and any setting where regulatory compliance is sought.

References

[1]  Aarsther KG, Moan T. 2009. Estimating navigation patterns from AIS. Journal of Navigation 62:587-607
[2]  Abbot C. 2009. Enforcing pollution control regulation: strengthening sanctions and improving deterrence. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
[3]  Ali J, Abdullah H. 2010. Impact of enforcement and co-management on compliance behavior of fishermen. International Journal of Economics and Finance 2:113-121
[4]  Brehm J, Hamilton JT. 1996. Noncompliance in environmental reporting: are violators ignorant, or evasive, of the law? American Journal of Political Science 40:444-477
[5]  Burby RJ, Paterson RG. 1993. Improving compliance with state environmental regulations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2:753-772
[6]  Conn PB, Silber GK. 2013. Vessel speed restrictions reduce risk of collision-related mortality for North Atlantic right whales. Ecosphere 4(43):1-15
[7]  2002. Dietz T, Stern PC, eds. New tools for environmental protection: education, information and voluntary measures. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[8]  Gelman A, Rubin DB. 1992. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 7:457-472
[9]  Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. 2003. Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
[10]  Gelman A. 2006. Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Analysis 1:515-533
[11]  Gray WB, Shimshack JP. 2011. The effectiveness of environmental monitoring and enforcement: a review of the empirical evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5:3-24
[12]  Gren IM, Li CZ. 2011. Enforcement of environmental regulations: inspection costs in Sweden. Environmental Economics 2:50-58
[13]  Gunningham N, Kagan RA, Thornton D. 2004. Social license and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry 29:307-341
[14]  Gunningham N, Kagan RA. 2005. Regulation and business behavior. Law and Policy 27:213-218
[15]  Gunningham N, Thornton D, Kagan RA. 2005. Motivating management: corporate compliance in environmental protection. Law and Policy 27:289-316
[16]  Hnneland G. 1999. A model of compliance in fisheries: theoretical foundations and practical application. Ocean & Coastal Management 42:699-716
[17]  Innes R, Frisvold G. 2009. The economics of endangered species. Annual Review of Resource Economics 1:485-512
[18]  Kagan RA, Gunningham N, Thornton D. 2011. Fear, duty, and regulatory compliance: lessons from three research projects. In: Parker C, Nielsen VL, eds. Explaining compliance: business responses to regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 37-58
[19]  Kraus SD, Brown MW, Caswell H, Clark CW, Fujiwara M, Hamilton PK, Kenney RD, Knowlton AR, Landry S, Mayo CA, McLellan WA, Moore MJ, Nowacek DP, Pabst DA, Read AJ, Rolland RM. 2005. North Atlantic right whales in crisis. Science 309:561-562
[20]  Laist DW, Knowlton AR, Meade JG, Collet AS, Podesta M. 2001. Collisions between ships and whales. Marine Mammal Science 17:35-75
[21]  Lagueux KM, Zani MA, Knowlton AR, Kraus SD. 2011. Response by vessel operators to protection measures for right whales Eubalaena glacialis in the southeast US calving ground. Endangered Species Research 14:69-77
[22]  Laist DW, Knowlton AR, Pendleton D. 2014. Effectiveness of mandatory vessel speed limits for protecting North Atlantic right whales. Endangered Species Research 23:133-147
[23]  Langpap C. 2006. Conservation of endangered species: can incentives work for private landowners? Ecological Economics 57:558-572
[24]  May PJ. 2005. Compliance motivations: perspectives of farmers, homebuilders, and marine facilities. Law and Policy 27:317-347
[25]  Nathan Associates Inc. 2012. Economic Analysis of North Atlantic Right Whale Ship Strike Reduction Rule: Update of Economic Impact and Scoping Assessment for Study of Potential Modifications. Report to the Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, NOAA. December 2012. Available at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/shipstrike/
[26]  NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2005. Recovery plan for the North Atlantic Right Whale (Eubalaena glacialis). U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. Available at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/recovery/whale_right_northatlantic.pdf
[27]  NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2008. Final rule to implement speed restrictions to reduce the threat of ship collisions with North Atlantic right whales. U.S. Department of Commerce. Federal Register 73:60173-60191
[28]  Patil AD, Huard D, Fonnesbeck CJ. 2010. PyMC: Bayesian stochastic modelling in Python. Journal of Statistical Software 35:1-81
[29]  Peterson K, Diss-Torrance A. 2012. Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations related to forest health. Journal of Environmental Management 112:104-119
[30]  Purdy R. 2010. Using Earth observation technologies for better regulatory compliance and enforcement of environmental laws. Journal of Environmental Law 22:59-87
[31]  Redfern JV, McKenna MF, Moore TJ, Calambokidis J, DeAngelis ML, Becker EA, Barlow J, Forney KA, Fiedler PC, Chivers SJ. 2013. Assessing the risk of ships striking large whales in marine spatial planning. Conservation Biology 27:292-302
[32]  Scholz JT, Gray WB. 1990. OSHA enforcement and workplace injuries: a behavioral approach to risk assessment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3:283-305
[33]  Shimshack JP, Ward MB. 2005. Regulator reputation, enforcement, and environmental compliance. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 50:519-540
[34]  Silber GK, Bettridge S. 2010. Vessel operations in right whale protection areas in 2009. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-OPR-44. Available at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/shipstrike/opr44.pdf
[35]  Silber GK, Bettridge S. 2012. An assessment of the Final Rule to implement vessel speed restrictions to reduce the threat of vessel collisions with North Atlantic right whales. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-OPR-48. Available at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/shipstrike/assessment_nmfsopr48.pdf
[36]  Silber GK, Adams JD, Bettridge S. 2012. Vessel operator response to a voluntary vessel/whale collision reduction measure. Endangered Species Research 17:245-254
[37]  Stafford S. 2012. Do carrots work? Examining the effectiveness of EPA’s compliance assistance program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 31:533-555
[38]  Tyler TR. 2006. Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Press.
[39]  van der Hoop JM, Vanderlaan AS, Taggart CT. 2012. Absolute probability estimates of lethal vessel strikes to North Atlantic right whales in Roseway Basin, Scotian Shelf. Ecological Applications 22:2021-2033
[40]  Vanderlaan ASM, Taggart CT. 2007. Vessel collisions with whales: the probability of lethal injury based on vessel speed. Marine Mammal Science 23:144-156
[41]  Van Waerebeek K, Baker AN, Félix F, Gedamke J, Iiguez M, Sanino GP, Secchi E, Sutaria D, Van Helden A, Wang Y. 2007. Vessel collisions with small cetaceans worldwide and with large whales in the Southern Hemisphere, an initial assessment. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 6:43-69
[42]  Wallmo K, Lew DK. 2011. Valuing improvements to threatened and endangered species: an application of state preference choice experiments. Journal of Environmental Management 92:1793-1801
[43]  Wiley DN, Moller JC, Pace RM, Carlson C. 2008. Effectiveness of voluntary conservation agreements: case study of endangered whales and commercial whale watching. Conservation Biology 22:450-457
[44]  Wiley DN, Thompson M, Pace RM, Levenson J. 2011. Modeling speed restrictions to mitigate lethal collisions between ships and whales in the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary, USA. Biological Conservation 144:2377-2381
[45]  Winter SC, May PJ. 2001. Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20:675-698

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133