全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PeerJ  2015 

No association between autistic traits and contextual influences on eye-movements during reading

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.466

Keywords: Autism,Autistic traits,Eye-movements,Reading,Sentence context,Reading comprehension,Semantic processing,Central coherence

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Individuals with autism spectrum disorders are claimed to show a local cognitive bias, termed “weak central coherence”, which manifests in a reduced influence of contextual information on linguistic processing. Here, we investigated whether this bias might also be demonstrated by individuals who exhibit sub-clinical levels of autistic traits, as has been found for other aspects of autistic cognition. The eye-movements of 71 university students were monitored as they completed a reading comprehension task. Consistent with previous studies, participants made shorter fixations on words that were highly predicted on the basis of preceding sentence context. However, contrary to the weak central coherence account, this effect was not reduced amongst individuals with high levels of autistic traits, as measured by the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Further exploratory analyses revealed that participants with high AQ scores fixated longer on words that resolved the meaning of an earlier homograph. However, this was only the case for sentences where the two potential meanings of the homograph result in different pronunciations. The results provide tentative evidence for differences in reading style that are associated with autistic traits, but fail to support the notion of weak central coherence extending into the non-autistic population.

References

[1]  Almeida RA, Dickinson JE, Maybery MT, Badcock JC, Badcock DR. 2010. A new step towards understanding embedded figures test performance in the autism spectrum: the radial frequency search task. Neuropsychologia 48(2):374-381
[2]  American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th edition). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
[3]  Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4):390-412
[4]  Baayen RH, Milin P. 2010. Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research 3(2):12-28
[5]  Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Skinner R, Martin J, Clubley E. 2001. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 31:5-17
[6]  Barr DJ. 2013. Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology 4 Article 328
[7]  Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68:255-278
[8]  Bates DM. 2005. Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News 5:27-30
[9]  Brock J, Bzishvili S. 2013. Deconstructing Frith and Snowling’s homograph-reading task: implications for autism spectrum disorder. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 66(9):1764-1773
[10]  Brock J, Caruana N. 2014. Reading for sound and reading for meaning in autism: Frith and Snowling (1983) revisited. In: Arciuli J, Brock J, eds. Communication in autism: trends in language acquisition research (TiLAR) series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 121-142
[11]  Brock J, Norbury C, Einav S, Nation K. 2008. Do individuals with autism process words in context? Evidence from language-mediated eye-movements. Cognition 108(3):896-904
[12]  Brock J, Xu JY, Brooks K. 2011. Individual differences in visual search: relationship to autistic traits, discrimination thresholds, and speed of processing. Perception 40:739-742
[13]  Burnette CP, Mundy PC, Meyer JA, Sutton SK, Vaughan AE, Charak D. 2005. Weak central coherence and its relations to theory of mind and anxiety in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 35:63-73
[14]  Duffy SA, Morris RK, Rayner K. 1988. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language 27(4):429-446
[15]  Ehrlich M. 1996. Metacognitive monitoring in the processing of anaphoric devices in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders. In: Cornoldi C, Oakhill J, eds. Reading comprehension difficulties: processes and remediation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 221-249
[16]  Ehrlich SF, Rayner K. 1981. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20(6):641-655
[17]  Ehrlich M, Remond M, Tardieu H. 1999. Processing of anaphoric devices in young skilled and less skilled comprehenders: differences in metacognitive monitoring. Reading and Writing 11:29-63
[18]  Frith U. 1989. Autism: explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.
[19]  Frith U, Snowling M. 1983. Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1(4):329-342
[20]  Gregory BL, Plaisted-Grant KC. The autism-spectrum quotient and visual search: shallow and deep autistic endophenotypes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders In Press
[21]  Happé FG. 1997. Central coherence and theory of mind in autism: reading homographs in context. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 15(Pt 1):1-12
[22]  Henderson LM, Clarke PJ, Snowling MJ. 2011. Accessing and selecting word meaning in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 52(9):964-973
[23]  Hoekstra R, Bartels M, Cath D, Boomsma D. 2008. Factor structure, reliability and criterion validity of the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): a study in Dutch population and patient groups. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 38(8):1555-1566
[24]  Hohenstein S, Laubrock J, Kliegl R. 2010. Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: a parafoveal fast-priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36(5):1150-1170
[25]  Jolliffe T, Baron-Cohen S. 1999. A test of central coherence theory; linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger’s syndrome: is local coherence impaired? Cognition 71:149-185
[26]  Kalikow DN, Stevens KN, Elliott LL. 1977. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61(5):1337-1351
[27]  Kliegl R, Nuthmann A, Engbert R. 2006. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135(1):12-35
[28]  Lopez B, Leekam SR. 2003. Do children with autism fail to process information in context? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 44(2):285-300
[29]  Milne E, Dunn SA, Freeth M, Rosas-Martinez L. 2013. Visual search performance is predicted by the degree to which selective attention to features modulates the ERP between 350 and 600 ms. Neuropsychologia 51(6):1109-1118
[30]  Norbury C. 2005. Barking up the wrong tree? Lexical ambiguity resolution in children with language impairments and autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 90(2):142-171
[31]  R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.R-project.org
[32]  Rayner K. 2009. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62:1457-1506
[33]  Rayner K, Duffy S. 1986. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition 14(3):191-201
[34]  Rayner K, Well A. 1996. Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: a further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3(4):504-509
[35]  Shipley WC, Gruber CP, Martin TA, Klein AM. 2009. Shipley-2: manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
[36]  Snowling M, Frith U. 1986. Comprehension in “hyperlexic” readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 42:392-415
[37]  SR Research. 2004. (Version 1.10.165).
[38]  Stewart ME, Ota M. 2008. Lexical effects on speech perception in individuals with autistic traits. Cognition 109(1):157-162
[39]  van der Schoot M, Vasbinder AL, Horsley TM, Reijntjes A, van Lieshout ECDM. 2009. Lexical ambiguity resolution in good and poor comprehenders: an eye fixation and self-paced reading study in primary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology 101(1):21-36
[40]  Voracek M, Dressler SG. 2006. High (feminised) digit ratio (2D:4D) in Danish men: a question of measurement method? Human Reproduction 21(5):1329-1331
[41]  Yuill NM, Oakhill JV. 1991. Children’s problems in text comprehension: an experimental investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[42]  Zubrucky K, Moore D. 1989. Children’s ability to use three standards to evaluate their comprehension of text. Reading Research Quarterly 24:336-352

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133