全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PeerJ  2015 

Plant dieback under exceptional drought driven by elevation, not by plant traits, in Big Bend National Park, Texas, USA

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.477

Keywords: Canopy dieback,Big Bend National Park,Leaf traits,Drought,Canopy cover,Elevational gradient

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In 2011, Big Bend National Park, Texas, USA, experienced the most severe single year drought in its recorded history, resulting in significant plant mortality. We used this event to test how perennial plant response to drought varied across elevation, plant growth form and leaf traits. In October 2010 and October 2011, we measured plant cover by species at six evenly-spaced elevations ranging from Chihuahuan desert (666 m) to oak forest in the Chisos mountains (1,920 m). We asked the following questions: what was the relationship between elevation and stem dieback and did susceptibility to drought differ among functional groups or by leaf traits? In 2010, pre-drought, we measured leaf mass per area (LMA) on each species. In 2011, the percent of canopy dieback for each individual was visually estimated. Living canopy cover decreased significantly after the drought of 2011 and dieback decreased with elevation. There was no relationship between LMA and dieback within elevations. The negative relationship between proportional dieback and elevation was consistent in shrub and succulent species, which were the most common growth forms across elevations, indicating that dieback was largely driven by elevation and not by species traits. Growth form turnover did not influence canopy dieback; differences in canopy cover and proportional dieback among elevations were driven primarily by differences in drought severity. These results indicate that the 2011 drought in Big Bend National Park had a large effect on communities at all elevations with average dieback for all woody plants ranging from 8% dieback at the highest elevation to 83% dieback at lowest elevations.

References

[1]  Allen RB, Peet RK, Baker WL. 1991. Gradient analysis of latitudinal variation in southern Rocky Mountain forests. Journal of Biogeography 18:123-139
[2]  Bylesj M, Segura V, Soolanayakanahally RY, Rae AM, Trygg J, Gustafsson P, Jansson S, Street NR. 2008. LAMINA: a tool for rapid quantification of leaf size and shape parameters. BMC Plant Biology 8:82
[3]  Cavender-Bares J, Holbrook NM. 2001. Hydraulic properties and freezing-induced cavitation in sympatric evergreen and deciduous oaks with contrasting habitats. Plant, Cell and Environment 24:1243-1256
[4]  Chesson P, Gebauer RLE, Schwinning S, Huntly N, Wiegand K, Ernest MSK, Sher A, Novoplansky A, Weltzin JF. 2004. Resource pulses, species interactions, and diversity maintenance in arid and semi-arid environments. Oecologia 141:236-253
[5]  Combs S. 2011. The impact of the 2011 drought and beyond. Texas: The office of the State Comptroller of Public Accounts. Publication No. 96-1704
[6]  Du Rietz GE. 1931. Life-forms of terrestrial flowering plants. I. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 3:1-95
[7]  Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: nonconvergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities. New Phytologist 180:100-113
[8]  Kukowski KR, Schwinning S, Schwartz BF. 2012. Hydraulic responses to extreme drought conditions in three co-dominant tree species in shallow soil over bedrock. Acta Oecologica 171:1-12
[9]  Langan SJ, Ewers FW, Davis SD. 1997. Xylem dysfunction caused by water stress and freezing in two species of co-occurring chaparral shrubs. Plant, Cell and Environment 20:425-437
[10]  Lloret F, Siscart D, Dalmases C. 2004. Canopy recovery after drought dieback in holm-oak Mediterranean forests of Catalonia (NE Spain) Global Change Biology 10:2092-2099
[11]  Martinez-Vilalta J, Pockman WT. 2002. The vulnerability to freezing-induced xylem cavitation of Larrea tridentata (Zygophyllaceae) in the Chihuahuan desert. American Journal of Botany 89:1916-1924
[12]  Merriam CH. 1890. Results of a biological survey of the San Francisco Mountain region and desert of the Little Colorado in Arizona. North American Fauna 3:1-4
[13]  Monneveux P, Belhassen E. 1996. The diversity of drought adaptation in the wide. Plant Growth Regulations 20:85-92
[14]  Muller CH. 1940. Oaks of trans-pecos Texas. American Midland Naturalist 24:703-728
[15]  Neilsen-Gammon JW. 2011. The 2011 Texas drought; a briefing package for the Texas legislature. Office of the State Climatologist. 43
[16]  NOAA. 2013. National Climatic Data Center. Available at http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html (accessed 15 August 2013)
[17]  Noy-Meir I. 1973. Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:25-51
[18]  Ogle K, Reynolds JF. 2004. Plant responses to precipitation in desert ecosystems: integrating functional types, pulses, thresholds, and delays. Oecologia 141:282-294
[19]  Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, the R Development Core Team. 2013. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (R package version 3.1-109).
[20]  Pockman WT, Sperry JS. 2000. Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran desert vegetation. American Journal of Botany 87:1287-1299
[21]  Poulos HM. 2014. Tree mortality from a global-change type drought coupled with a short-duration freezing event in a Southwestern pion-juniper woodland, USA. PeerJ PrePrints 2:e237v1
[22]  Powell AM. 1998. Trees & shrubs of the trans-pecos and adjacent areas (Revised edition). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 517
[23]  R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing Vienna: R foundation for statistical computing. Available at http://www.R-project.org/
[24]  Robertson TR, Zak JC, Tissue DT. 2009. Precipitation magnitude and timing differentially affect species richness and plant density in the sotol grassland of the Chihuahuan Desert. Oecologia 162:185-197
[25]  Schwinning S, Ehleringer JR. 2001. Water use trade-offs and optimal adaptations to pulse-driven arid ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 89:464-480
[26]  Schwinning S, Sala OE. 2004. Hierarchy of responses to resource pulses in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141:211-220
[27]  Sperry JS, Ikeda T. 1997. Xylem cavitation in roots and stems of Douglas-fir and white fir. Tree Physiology 17:275-280
[28]  Warton DI, Hui FKC. 2011. The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology 92:3-10
[29]  Whittaker RH, Niering WA. 1964. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. I. Ecological classification and distribution of species. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science 3:9-34
[30]  Whittaker RH, Niering WA. 1965. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: a gradient analysis of the south slope. Ecology 46:429-452
[31]  Whittaker RH, Niering WA. 1968. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona III. Species distribution and floristic relations on the north slope. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science 5:3-21
[32]  Witkowski ETF, Lamont BB. 1991. Leaf specific mass confounds leaf density and thickness. Oecologia 88:486-493
[33]  Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M. 2001. Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high-and low-rainfall and high-and low-nutrient habitats. Functional Ecology 15:423-434
[34]  Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L D, Pyankov V I, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821-827

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133