全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PeerJ  2015 

Disjoint combinations profiling (DCP): a new method for the prediction of antibody CDR conformation from sequence

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.455

Keywords: Conformational prediction,CDR conformation,Blind test,Canonical templates,CDR-H3 sequence rules,DCP,Humanisation,Prediction from sequence,Antibody engineering

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The accurate prediction of the conformation of Complementarity-Determining Regions (CDRs) is important in modelling antibodies for protein engineering applications. Specifically, the Canonical paradigm has proved successful in predicting the CDR conformation in antibody variable regions. It relies on canonical templates which detail allowed residues at key positions in the variable region framework or in the CDR itself for 5 of the 6 CDRs. While no templates have as yet been defined for the hypervariable CDR-H3, instead, reliable sequence rules have been devised for predicting the base of the CDR-H3 loop. Here a new method termed Disjoint Combinations Profiling (DCP) is presented, which contributes a considerable advance in the prediction of CDR conformations. This novel method is explained and compared with canonical templates and sequence rules in a 3-way blind prediction. DCP achieved 93% accuracy over 951 blind predictions and showed an improvement in cumulative accuracy compared to predictions with canonical templates or sequence rules. In addition to its overall improvement in prediction accuracy, it is suggested that DCP is open to better implementations in the future and that it can improve as more antibody structures are deposited in the databank. In contrast, it is argued that canonical templates and sequence rules may have reached their peak.

References

[1]  Al-Lazikani B, Lesk AM, Chothia C. 1997. Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. Journal of Molecular Biology 273:927-948
[2]  Alzari PM, Spinelli S, Mariuzza RA, Boulot G, Poljak RJ, Jarvis JM, Milstein C. 1990. Three-dimensional structure determination of an anti-2-phenyloxazolone antibody: the role of somatic mutation and heavy/light chain pairing in the maturation of an immune response. EMBO Journal 9:3807-3814
[3]  Barré S, Greenberg AS, Flajnik MF, Chothia C. 1994. Structural conservation of hypervariable regions in immunoglobulins evolution. Journal of Structural Biology 1:915-920
[4]  Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. 2000. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Research 28:235-242
[5]  Choi Y, Deane CM. 2011. Predicting antibody complementarity determining region structures without classification. Molecular BioSystems 7:3327-3334
[6]  Chothia C, Lesk AM, Levitt M, Amit AG, Mariuzza RA, Phillips SEV, Poljak RJ. 1986. The predicted structure of immunoglobulin D1.3 and its comparison with the crystal structure. Science 233:755-758
[7]  Chothia C, Lesk AM. 1987. Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. Journal of Molecular Biology 196:901-917
[8]  Chothia C, Lesk AM, Tramontano A, Levitt M, Smith-Gill SJ, Air G, Sheriff S, Padlan EA, Davies D, Tulip WR, Colman PM, Spinelli S, Alzari PM, Poljak RJ. 1989. Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions. Nature 342:877-883
[9]  Chothia C, Lesk AM, Gherardi E, Tomlinson IM, Walter G, Marks JD, Llewelyn MB, Winter G. 1992. Structural repertoire of the human VH segments. Journal of Molecular Biology 227:799-817
[10]  Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. 2004. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Research 14:1188-1190
[11]  de la Paz P, Sutton BJ, Darsley MJ, Rees AR. 1986. Modelling of the combining sites of three anti-lysozyme monoclonal antibodies and of the complex between one of the antibodies and its epitope. EMBO Journal 5:415-425
[12]  Furukawa K, Shirai H, Azuma T, Nakamura H. 2001. A role of the third complementarity-determining region in the affinity maturation of an antibody. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:27622-27628
[13]  Guarne A, Bravo J, Calvo J, Lozano F, Vives J, Fita I. 1996. Conformation of the hypervariable region L3 without the key proline residue. Protein Science 5:1931-1933
[14]  Guex N, Peitsch MC. 1997. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modelling. Electrophoresis 18:2714-2723
[15]  Kabat EA, Wu TT, Bilofsky H. 1977. Unusual distributions of amino acids in complementarity-determining (hypervariable) segments of heavy and light chains of immunoglobulins and their possible roles in specificity of antibody-combining sites. Journal of Biological Chemistry 252:6609-6616
[16]  Kuroda D, Shirai H, Kobori M, Nakamura H. 2008. Structural classification of CDR-H3 revisited: a lesson in antibody modelling. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 73:608-620
[17]  Martin AC, Thornton JM. 1996. Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic classification, modeling and application to antibodies. Journal of Molecular Biology 263:800-815
[18]  Morea V, Tramontano A, Rustici M, Chothia C, Lesk AM. 1997. Antibody structure, prediction and redesign. Biophysical Chemistry 68:9-16
[19]  Morea V, Lesk AM, Tramontano A. 2000. Antibody modeling: implications for engineering and design. Methods 20:267-279
[20]  Nikoloudis D, Pitts JE, Saldanha JW. 2014. A complete, multi-level conformational clustering of antibody complementarity determining regions. PeerJ 2:e456
[21]  North B, Lehmann A, Dunbrack RL. 2011. A new clustering of antibody cdr loop conformations. Journal of Molecular Biology 406:228-256
[22]  Shirai H, Kidera A, Nakamura H. 1996. Structural classification of CDR-H3 in antibodies. FEBS Letters 399:1-8
[23]  Shirai H, Kidera A, Nakamura H. 1999. H3-rules: identification of CDR-H3 structures in antibodies. FEBS Letters 455:188-197
[24]  Sivasubramanian A, Sircar A, Chaudhury S, Gray JJ. 2009. Toward high-resolution homology modelling of antibody Fv regions and application to antibody–antigen docking. Proteins 74:497-514
[25]  Soto CS, Fasnacht M, Zhu J, Forrest L, Honig B. 2008. Loop modelling: sampling, filtering, and scoring. Proteins 70:834-843
[26]  Tramontano A, Chothia C, Lesk AM. 1990. Framework residue 71 is a major determinant of the position and conformation of the second hypervariable region in the VH domains of immunoglobulins. Journal of Molecular Biology 215:175-182
[27]  Tomlinson IM, Cox JPL, Gherardi E, Lesk AM, Chothia C. 1995. The structural repertoire of the human Vκ domain. EMBO Journal 14:4628-4638
[28]  Vargas-Madrazo E, Paz-García E. 2002. Modifications to canonical structure sequence patterns: analysis for L1 and L3. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics 47:250-254
[29]  Weitzner BD, Kuroda D, Marze N, Xu J, Gray JJ. 2014. Blind prediction performance of RosettaAntibody 3.0: Grafting, relaxation, kinematic loop modelling, and full CDR optimization. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics Epub ahead of print
[30]  Wu TT, Kabat EA. 1970. An analysis of the sequences of the variable regions of Bence-Jones proteins and myeloma light chains and their implications for antibody complementarity. Journal of Experimental Medicine 132:211-250

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133