Loss of large mammalian carnivores may allow smaller mesopredators to become abundant and threaten other community members. There is considerable debate about mesopredator release and the role that other potential factors such as landscape variables and human alterations to land cover lead to increased mesopredator abundance. We used camera traps to detect four mesopredators (tayra, Eira barbara; white-nosed coati, Nasua narica; northern raccoon, Procyon lotor; and common opossum, Didelphis opossum) in a biological corridor in Costa Rica to estimate habitat covariates that influenced the species’ detection and occurrence. We selected these mesopredators because as semi-arboreal species they might be common nest predators, posing a serious threat to resident and migratory songbirds. Pineapple production had a pronounced positive effect on the detectability of tayras, while forest cover had a negative effect on the detection of coatis. This suggests that abundance might be elevated due to the availability of agricultural food resources and foraging activities are concentrated in forest fragments and pineapple edge habitats. Raccoon and opossum models exhibited little influence on detection from habitat covariates. Occurrence models did not suggest any significant factors influencing site use by nest predators, revealing that all four species are habitat generalists adapted to co-existing in human altered landscapes. Furthermore, fragmentation and land cover changes may predispose nesting birds, herpetofauna, and small mammals to heightened predation risk by mesopredators in the Neotropics.
References
[1]
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach (Second edition). New York: Springer-Verlag.
[2]
Cove MV, Jones BM, Bossert AJ, Clever DR, Dunwoody RK, White BC, Jackson VL. 2012a. Use of camera traps to examine the mesopredator release hypothesis in a fragmented Midwestern landscape. American Midland Naturalist 168:456-465
[3]
Cove MV, Pardo L, Spínola RM, Jackson VL, Saenz JC. 2012b. Coyote Canis latrans (Carnivora: Canidae) range extension in northeastern Costa Rica: possible explanations and consequences. Latin American Journal of Conservation 3:82-86
[4]
Cove MV, Niva LM, Jackson VL. 2012. Use of probability of detection when conducting analyses of surveys of mesopredators: a Case Study from the Ozark Highlands of Missouri. The Southwestern Naturalist 57:258-262
[5]
Cove MV, Spínola RM, Jackson VL, Saenz JC, Chassot O. 2013. Integrating occupancy modeling and camera-trap data to estimate medium and large mammal detection and richness in a Central American biological corridor. Tropical Conservation Science 6:781-795
[6]
Crooks KR, Soulé ME. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563-566
[7]
Dijack WD, Thompson FR. 2000. Landscape and edge effects on the distribution of mammalian predators in Missouri. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:209-216
[8]
Donadio E, Buskirk SW. 2006. Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in Carnivora. American Naturalist 167:524-536
[9]
Donovan TM, Jones PW, Annand EM, Thompson FR. 1997. Variation in local-scale edge effects: mechanisms and landscape context. Ecology 78:2064-2075
Elmhagen B, Rushton SP. 2007. Trophic control of mesopredators in the terrestrial ecosystems: top-down or bottom-up? Ecology Letters 10:197-206
[12]
Fagen ME, DeFries RS, Sensie SE, Arroyo JP, Walker W, Soto C, Chazdon RL, Sanchum A. 2013. Land cover dynamics following a deforestation ban in northern Costa Rica. Environmental Research Letters 8 Article 034017
[13]
Gannon WL, Sikes RS. 2007. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild animals in research. Journal of Mammalogy 88:809-823
[14]
Garrott RA, White PJ, Vanderbilt White CA. 1993. Overabundance: an issue for conservation biologists? Conservation Biology 7:946-949
[15]
Gehrt SD, Clark WR. 2003. Raccoons, coyotes, and reflections on the mesopredator release hypothesis. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31:836-842
[16]
Gompper ME. 1995. Nasua narica. Mammalian Species 487:1-10
[17]
Hines JE. 2009. Presence 2.4—software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters: USGS-PWRC. Available at http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html
[18]
Long RA, Donovan TM, MacKay P, Zielinski WJ, Buzas JS. 2011. Predicting carnivore occurrence with noninvasive surveys and occupancy modeling. Landscape Ecology 26:327-340
[19]
Lotze J-H, Anderson S. 1979. Procyon lotor. Mammalian Species 119:1-8
[20]
MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Sutton N, Kawanishi K, Bailey LL. 2005. Improving inferences in population studies of rare species that are detected imperfectly. Ecology 86:1101-1113
McManus JJ. 1974. Didelphis virginiana. Mammalian Species 40:1-6
[23]
Morrison JC, Sechrest W, Dinerstein E, Wilcove DS, Lamoreux JF. 2007. Persistence of large mammal faunas as indicators of global human impacts. Journal of Mammalogy 88:1363-1380
[24]
Morse WC, Schedlbauer JL, Sensie SE, Finegan B, Harvey CA, Hollenhorst SJ, Kavanagh KL, Stoian D, Wulfhurst JD. 2009. Consequences of environmental service payments for forest retention and recruitment in a Costa Rican biological corridor. Ecology and Society 14 Article 23
[25]
O’Connell AF, Bailey LL. 2011. Inference for occupancy and occupancy dynamics. In: O’Connell AF, Nichols JD, Karanth KU, eds. Camera traps in animal ecology: methods and analyses. New York: Springer. 191-207
[26]
Palomares F, Caro TM. 1999. Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. American Naturalist 153:492-508
[27]
Presley SJ. 2000. Eira barbara. Mammalian Species 636:1-6
[28]
Roemer GW, Gompper ME, Van Valkengurgh B. 2009. The ecological role of the mammalian mesocarnivore. Bioscience 59:165-173
[29]
Tobler MW, Carrillo-Percastegui SE, Leite Pitman R, Mares R, Powell G. 2008. An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large and medium sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation 11:169-178
[30]
Wainwright M. 2007. The mammals of Costa Rica: a natural history and field guide. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.