Dominance hierarchies, diversity and species richness of vascular plants in an alpine meadow: contrasting short and medium term responses to simulated global change
We studied the impact of simulated global change on a high alpine meadow plant community. Specifically, we examined whether short-term (5 years) responses are good predictors for medium-term (7 years) changes in the system by applying a factorial warming and nutrient manipulation to 20 plots in Latnjajaure, subarctic Sweden. Seven years of experimental warming and nutrient enhancement caused dramatic shifts in dominance hierarchies in response to the nutrient and the combined warming and nutrient enhancement treatments. Dominance hierarchies in the meadow moved from a community being dominated by cushion plants, deciduous, and evergreen shrubs to a community being dominated by grasses, sedges, and forbs. Short-term responses were shown to be inconsistent in their ability to predict medium-term responses for most functional groups, however, grasses showed a consistent and very substantial increase in response to nutrient addition over the seven years. The non-linear responses over time point out the importance of longer-term studies with repeated measurements to be able to better predict future changes. Forecasted changes to temperature and nutrient availability have implications for trophic interactions, and may ultimately influence the access to and palatability of the forage for grazers. Depending on what anthropogenic change will be most pronounced in the future (increase in nutrient deposits, warming, or a combination of them both), different shifts in community dominance hierarchies may occur. Generally, this study supports the productivity–diversity relationship found across arctic habitats, with community diversity peaking in mid-productivity systems and degrading as nutrient availability increases further. This is likely due the increasing competition in plant–plant interactions and the shifting dominance structure with grasses taking over the experimental plots, suggesting that global change could have high costs to biodiversity in the Arctic.
References
[1]
Aerts R. 1999. Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant–soil feedbacks. Journal of Experimental Botany 50:29-37
[2]
Alatalo JM. 1998. Climate change: impacts on structure and biodiversity of subarctic plant communities. Sweden: Gteborg University.
[3]
Alatalo JM, Little CJ. 2014. Simulated global change: contrasting short and medium term growth and reproductive responses of a common alpine/Arctic cushion plant to experimental warming and nutrient enhancement. SpringerPlus 3 Article 157
[4]
Arft AM, Walker MDM, Gurevitch J, Alatalo JM, Bret-Harte MS, Dale M, Diemer M, Gugerli F, Henry GHR, Jones MH, Hollister RD, Jónsdóttir IS, Laine K, Lévesque E, Marion GM, Molau U, Mlgaard P, Nordenhll U, Raszhivin V, Robinson CH, Starr G, Stenstrm A, Stenstrm M, Totland , Turner PL, Walker LJ, Webber PJ, Welker JM, Wookey PA. 1999. Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: meta-analysis of the international tundra experiment. Ecological Monographs 69:491-511
[5]
Bassin S, Volk M, Suter M, Buchmann N, Fuhrer J. 2007. Nitrogen deposition but not ozone affects productivity and community composition of subalpine grassland after 3 yr of treatment. The New Phytologist 175:523-534
[6]
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B. 2012. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999999-0). Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package0lme4
[7]
Bowman WD, Theodose TA, Schardt JC, Conant RT. 1993. Constraints of nutrient availability on primary production in two alpine tundra communities. Ecology 74:2085-2097
[8]
Callaghan TV, Jonasson S. 1995. Implications for changes in arctic plant biodiversity from environmental manipulation experiments. In: Chapin FSI, Krner C, eds. Arctic and alpine biodiversity: patterns, causes and ecosystem consequences. Berlin: Springer. 151-166
[9]
Callaghan TV, Jonasson C, Thierfelder T, Yang Z, Hedens H, Johansson M, Molau U, Van Bogaert R, Michelsen A, Olofsson J, Gwynn-Jones D, Bokhorst S, Phoenix G, Bjerke JW, Tmmervik H, Christensen TR, Hanna E, Koller EK, Sloan VL. 2013. Ecosystem change and stability over multiple decades in the Swedish subarctic: complex processes and multiple drivers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368 Article 20120488
[10]
Calvo L, Alonso I, Fernàndez A, De Luis E. 2005. Short-term study of effects of fertilisation and cutting treatments on the vegetation dynamics of mountain heathlands in Spain. Plant Ecology 179:181-191
[11]
Campioli M, Leblans N, Michelsen A. 2012. Twenty-two years of warming, fertilisation and shading of subarctic heath shrubs promote secondary growth and plasticity but not primary growth. PLoS ONE 7:e34842
[12]
Capers RS, Stone AD. 2011. After 33 years, trees more frequent and shrubs more abundant in northeast US alpine community. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 43:495-502
[13]
Cavieres L, Arroyo M. 2002. Nurse effect of Bolax gummifera cushion plants in the alpine vegetation of the Chilean Patagonian Andes. Journal of Vegetation Science 13:547-554
[14]
Chapin FI, Shaver G, Giblin A, Nadelhoffer K, Laundre J. 1995. Responses of arctic tundra to experimental and observed changes in climate. Ecology 76:694-711
[15]
Day TA, Ruhland CT, Strauss SL, Park JH, Krieg ML, Krna MA, Bryant DM. 2009. Response of plants and the dominant microarthropod, Cryptopygus antarcticus, to warming and contrasting precipitation regimes in Antarctic tundra. Global Change Biology 15:1640-1651
[16]
Dormann C, Woodin S. 2002. Climate change in the Arctic? using plant functional types in a meta-analysis of field experiments. Functional Ecology 16:4-17
[17]
Elmendorf SC, Henry GHR, Hollister RD, Alatalo J, Bjrk RG, Bjorkman AD, Callaghan TV, Collier LS, Cooper EJ, Cornelissen JHC, Day TA, Fosaa AM, Gould WA, Grétarsdóttir J, Harte J, Hermanutz L, Hik DS, Hofgaard A, Jarrad F, Jónsdóttir IS, Keuper F, Klanderud K, Klein JA, Koh S, Kudo G, Lang SI, Loewen V, May JL, Mercado J, Michelsen A, Molau U, Myers-Smith IH, Oberbauer SF, Pieper S, Post E, Rixen C, Robinson CH, Schmidt NM, Shaver GR, Stenstrm A, Tolvanen A, Totland O, Troxler T, Wahren C-H, Webber PJ, Welker JM, Wookey PA. 2012. Global assessment of experimental climate warming on tundra vegetation: heterogeneity over space and time. Ecology Letters 15:164-175
[18]
Foster BL, Gross KL. 1998. Species richness in a successional grassland: effects of nitrogen enrichment and plant litter. Ecology 79:2593-2602
[19]
Graglia E, Jonasson S, Michelsen A, Schmidt IK, Havstroim M, Gustavsson L. 2001. Effects of environmental perturbations on abundance of subarctic plants after three, seven and ten years of treatments. Oikos 24:5-12
[20]
Grime J. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology 86:902-910
[21]
Grimm NB, Chapin FS, Bierwagen B, Gonzalez P, Groffman PM, Luo Y, Melton F, Nadelhoffer K, Pairis A, Raymond PA, Schimel J, Williamson CE. 2013. The impacts of climate change on ecosystem structure and function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:474-482
[22]
Henry GHR, Freedman B, Svoboda J. 1986. Effects of fertilization on three tundra plant communities of a polar desert oasis. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:2502-2507
[23]
Hollister RD, Webber PJ, Tweedie CE. 2005. The response of Alaskan arctic tundra to experimental warming: differences between short- and long-term responses. Global Change Biology 11:525-536
[24]
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50:346-363
[25]
IPCC. 2007. Parry ML, ed. Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vol. 4
[26]
Jgerbrand AK, Alatalo JM, Chrimes D, Molau U. 2009. Plant community responses to 5 years of simulated climate change in meadow and heath ecosystems at a subarctic-alpine site. Oecologia 161:601-610
[27]
Jump AS, Peuelas J. 2005. Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecology Letters 8:1010-1020
Klanderud K, Totland . 2004. Habitat dependent nurse effects of the dwarf-shrub Dryas octopetala on alpine and arctic plant community structure. Euroscience 11:410-420
[30]
Klanderud K, Totland . 2005. Simulated climate change altered dominance hierarchies and diversity of an alpine biodiversity hotspot. Ecology 86:2047-2054
[31]
Klein JA, Harte J, Zhao X-Q. 2004. Experimental warming causes large and rapid species loss, dampened by simulated grazing, on the Tibetan Plateau. Ecology Letters 7:1170-1179
[32]
Marion G, Henry GHR, Freckrnan DW, Johnstone I, Jones G, Jones MH, Levesque E, Molau U, Molgaard P, Parsons AN, Svoboda J, Virgina RA. 1997. Open-top designs for manipulating field temperature in high-latitude ecosystems. Global Change Biology 3:20-32
[33]
May JL, Hollister RD. 2012. Validation of a simplified point frame method to detect change in tundra vegetation. Polar Biology 35:1815-1823
[34]
Mazerolle MJ. 2013. AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c) (version 1.28). Available at http://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg
[35]
McManus KM, Morton DC, Masek JG, Wang D, Sexton JO, Nagol JR, Ropars P, Boudreau S. 2012. Satellite-based evidence for shrub and graminoid tundra expansion in northern Quebec from 1986 to 2010. Global Change Biology 18:2313-2323
[36]
Molau U. 1993. Relationships between flowering phenology and life history strategies in tundra plants. Arctic and Alpine Research 25:391-402
[37]
Molau U, Alatalo JM. 1998. Responses of subarctic-alpine plant communities to simulated environmental change: biodiversity of bryophytes, lichens, and vascular plants. Ambio 27:322-329
[38]
Molenda O, Reid AM, Lortie CJ. 2012. The alpine cushion plant Silene acaulis as foundation species: a bug’s-eye view to facilitation and microclimate. PLoS ONE 7:e37223
[39]
Morris W, Pfister C, Tuljapurkar S, Haridas CV, Boggs CL, Boyce MS, Bruna E, Church D, Coulson T, Doak D, Forsyth S, Gaillard J, Horwitz C, Kalisz S, Kendall B, Knight T, Lee C, Menges ES. 2008. Longevity can buffer plant and animal populations against changing climatic variability. Ecology 89:19-25
[40]
Niu S, Wan S. 2008. Warming changes plant competitive hierarchy in a temperate steppe in northern China. Journal of Plant Ecology 1:103-110
[41]
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MH, Wagner H. 2012. vegan: Community ecology package (version 2.0-5). Available at http://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan
[42]
Olsen SL, Klanderud K. 2014. Biotic interactions limit species richness in an alpine plant community, especially under experimental warming. Oikos 123:71-78
[43]
Olsen SL, Sandvik SM, Totland . 2013. Influence of two N-fixing legumes on plant community properties and soil nutrient levels in an alpine ecosystem. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 45:363-371
[44]
Onipchenko VG, Makarov MI, Akhmetzhanova AA, Soudzilovskaia NA, Aibazova FU, Elkanova MK, Stogova AV, Cornelissen JHC. 2012. Alpine plant functional group responses to fertiliser addition depend on abiotic regime and community composition. Plant and Soil 357:103-115
[45]
Pajunen AM, Oksanen J, Virtanen R. 2011. Impact of shrub canopies on understorey vegetation in western Eurasian tundra. Journal of Vegetation Science 22:837-846
[46]
Parmesan C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37:637-669
[47]
Polunin N. 1951. The real arctic: suggestions for its delimitation, subdivision, and characterization. Journal of Ecology 39:308-315
[48]
Press MC, Potter JA, Burke MJW, Callaghan TV, Lee JA. 1998. Responses of a subarctic dwarf shrub heath community to simulated environmental change. Journal of Ecology 86:315-327
[49]
R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing
[50]
Robinson CH, Wookey PA, Lee JA, Callaghan TV, Press MC. 1998. Plant community responses to simulated environmental change at a high arctic polar semi-desert. Ecology 79(3):856-866
[51]
Roy J, Albert CH, Ibanez S, Saccone P, Zinger L, Choler P, Clément J-C, Lavergne S, Geremia RA. 2013. Microbes on the cliff: alpine cushion plants structure bacterial and fungal communities. Frontiers in Microbiology 4 Article 64
[52]
Sala OE, Chapin F, Armesto J. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770-1774
[53]
Soudzilovskaia N, Onipchenko VG. 2005. Experimental investigation of fertilization and irrigation effects on an alpine heath, northwestern Caucasus, Russia. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 37:602-610
[54]
Theodose T, Bowman W. 1997. Nutrient availability, plant abundance, and species diversity in two alpine tundra communities. Ecology 78:1861-1872
[55]
Van Wijk MT, Clemmensen KE, Shaver GR, Williams M, Callaghan TV, Chapin FSI, Cornelissen JHC, Gough L, Hobbie SE, Jonasson S, Lee JA, Michelsen A, Press MC, Richardson SJ, Rueth H. 2004. Long-term ecosystem level experiments at Toolik Lake, Alaska, and at Abisko, Northern Sweden: generalizations and differences in ecosystem and plant type responses to global change. Global Change Biology 31:105-123
[56]
Virtanen R, Grytnes J-A, Lenoir J, Luoto M, Oksanen J, Oksanen L, Svenning J-C. 2013. Productivity–diversity patterns in arctic tundra vegetation. Ecography 36:331-341
[57]
Walker MD. 1996. Community baseline measurements for ITEX studies. In: Molau U, Miolgaard P, eds. ITEX manual (2nd edition). Copenhagen: Danish Polar Centre. 39-41
[58]
Walker MD, Walker D, Theodose T, Webber PJ. 2001. The vegetation: hierarchical species-environment relationships. In: Bowman W, Seastedt T, eds. Structure and function of an alpine ecosystem: Niwot Ridge, Colorado. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 99-127
[59]
Wardle DA, Gundale MJ, Jaderlund A, Nilsson M-C. 2013. Decoupled long-term effects of nutrient enrichment on aboveground and belowground properties in subalpine tundra. Ecology 94:904-919
