全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Nonholonomic Motion Planning Strategy for Underactuated Manipulator

DOI: 10.1155/2014/743857

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This paper develops nonholonomic motion planning strategy for three-joint underactuated manipulator, which uses only two actuators and can be converted into chained form. Since the manipulator was designed focusing on the control simplicity, there are several issues for motion planning, mainly including transformation singularity, path estimation, and trajectory robustness in the presence of initial errors, which need to be considered. Although many existing motion planning control laws for chained form system can be directly applied to the manipulator and steer it to desired configuration, coordinate transformation singularities often happen. We propose two mathematical techniques to avoid the transformation singularities. Then, two evaluation indicators are defined and used to estimate control precision and linear approximation capability. In the end, the initial error sensitivity matrix is introduced to describe the interference sensitivity, which is called robustness. The simulation and experimental results show that an efficient and robust resultant path of three-joint underactuated manipulator can be successfully obtained by use of the motion planning strategy we presented. 1. Introduction In the past few years, nonholonomic motion planning has become an attractive research field. Much theoretical development and application have been exploited. This paper can be viewed as the further study on the basis of [1], which proposed -joint underactuated manipulator [2]. And inspired by [3–5], its physical design is carried out mainly focusing on the kinematic model with triangular structure, which can be converted into chained form and achieve the control simplicity. Although motion planning control law can steer the chained form system to desired state, there exists transformation singularity while chained form path is transformed back into actual coordinates. Even in the absence of singularity, planning nonholonomic motion is not an easy task. Transformation singularities add a second level of difficulty: we must take into account both transformation singularities and nonholonomic constraint. In order to solve transformation singularity problem, the path in chained form space should remain in the singularity-free regions. In other words, when a path does not belong to those regions in chained form coordinate, transformation singularity will appear in actual coordinate. Therefore, transformation singularity avoidance is equivalent to obstacle avoidance in chained form space. Singularity regions can be checked by diffeomorphism of chained form

References

[1]  Y. Tan, L. Li, M. Liu, and G. Chen, “Design and path planning for controllable underactuated manipulator,” International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 212–221, 2012.
[2]  T. G. Tan, Research on underactuated manipulator and motion control based on nonholonomic constrains [Ph.D. thesis], Wuhan University of Technology, 2005.
[3]  O. J. Sordalen, “Conversion of the kinematics of a car with n trailers into a chained form,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 382–387, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, May 1993.
[4]  R. M. Murray and S. S. Sastry, “Steering nonholonomic systems in chained form,” in Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1121–1126, Brighton, UK, December 1991.
[5]  Y. Nakamura, W. Chung, and O. J. Sordalen, “Design and control of the nonholonomic manipulator,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 48–59, 2001.
[6]  H. G. Tanner, S. G. Loizou, and K. J. Kyriakopoulos, “Nonholonomic navigation and control of cooperating mobile manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2003.
[7]  Y. Q. Ren and B. L. Ma, “Global stabilization of a class of nonholonomic systems,” Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 979–984, 2007.
[8]  B. L. Ma, “Global k-exponential asymptotic stabilization of underactuated surface vessels,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 58, pp. 194–201, 2009.
[9]  A. Krontiris, S. Louis, and K. E. Bekris, “Multi-level formation roadmaps for collision-free dynamic shape changes with non-holonomic teams,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1570–1575, 2012.
[10]  J. Wit, C. D. Crane III, and D. Armstrong, “Autonomous ground vehicle path tracking,” Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 439–449, 2004.
[11]  W. D. Esquivel and L. E. Chiang, “Nonholonomic path planning among obstacles subject to curvature restrictions,” Robotica, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 49–58, 2002.
[12]  Y. Zhu, T. Zhang, and J.-Y. Song, “Path planning for nonholonomic mobile robots using artificial potential field method,” Control Theory and Applications, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 152–158, 2010.
[13]  J. Barraquand, B. Langlois, and J.-C. Latombe, “Numerical potential field techniques for robot path planning,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 224–241, 1992.
[14]  S. Garrido, L. Moreno, D. Blanco, and M. F. Martín, “Robotic motion using harmonic functions and finite elements,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 57–73, 2010.
[15]  S. Sekhavat and J.-P. Laumond, “Topological property for collision-free nonholonomic motion planning: the case of sinusoidal inputs for chained form systems,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 671–680, 1998.
[16]  E. Papadopoulos, I. Papadimitriou, and I. Poulakakis, “Polynomial-based obstacle avoidance techniques for nonholonomic mobile manipulator systems,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 229–247, 2005.
[17]  S. Sekhavat and J. P. Laumond, “Topological property of trajectories computed from sinusoidal inputs for nonholonomic chained form systems,” in Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 4, pp. 3383–3388, April 1996.
[18]  Y. G. Tan and Z. D. Zhou, “Motion Decomposition and Composition Transmission Mechanism Based on Friction Disk,” Patent of the People's Republic of China, No. ZL 02147771.X, September 2004.
[19]  D. Tilbury, R. M. Murray, and S. S. Sastry, “Trajectory generation for the N-trailer problem using goursat normal form,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 802–819, 1995.
[20]  A. W. Divelbiss and J. T. Wen, “A path space approach to nonholonomic motion planning in the presence of obstacles,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 443–451, 1997.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133