The ability to identify incipient faults at an early stage in the operation of machinery has been demonstrated to provide substantial value to industry. These benefits for automated, in situ, and online monitoring of machinery, structures, and systems subject to varying operating conditions are difficult to achieve at present when they are run in operationally constrained environments that demand uninterrupted operation in this mode. This work focuses on developing a simple algorithm for this problem class; novelty detection is deployed on feature vectors generated from the cross correlation of vibration signals from sensors mounted on disparate locations in a power train. The behavior of these signals in a gearbox subject to varying load and speed is expected to remain in a commensurate state until a change in some physical aspect of the mechanical components, presumed to be indicative of gearbox failure. Cross correlation will be demonstrated to generate excellent classification results for a gearbox subject to independently changing load and speed. It eliminates the need to analyze the highly complex dynamics of this system; it generalizes well across untaught ranges of load and speed; it eliminates the need to identify and measure all predominant time-varying parameters; it is simple and computationally inexpensive. 1. Introduction The dynamics of the vibrations generated by a gearbox subject to changing load and speed are complex and nonlinear. Faults in bearings, gears, or other aspects of prime movers can easily be masked by the effects of these state changes alone when one fails to consider their effects on decision rules. The detection of faults in this class of machineries is a growing concern in the literature. In this work, we adapt a technique from sensor failure analysis to reduce this present problem’s complexity. A common approach in detecting failure in sensors employs decision rules based on the cross correlation of their signals; in broaching this technique to variable-state machinery, the authors note that vibrations at disparate locations in a power train should be correlated to one another (e.g., the spectra of vibrations from the output shaft of a gearbox are related to those of the input shaft by the gear ratio of the gearbox). Signals from disparate locations of a power train may contain similar vibration from components along the train; for instance, the load on the gearbox’s bearings is modulated by the meshing of the gear’s teeth and its vibrations or acoustics will be apparent at both the input and the output of the gearbox
References
[1]
J. McBain and M. Timusk, “Fault detection in variable speed machinery: statistical parameterization,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 327, no. 3–5, pp. 623–646, 2009.
[2]
J. McBain and M. Timusk, Novelty Detection Augmented for Fault Detection in Variable Speed Machinery, 2012.
[3]
H. Ohta and T. Aikawa, “Extraction method of failure component on vibration and acoustic signals generated by a reciprocal engine based on cross correlation of close two point signals and characteristic of paralleled Auto Regressive Model with Extra Input,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management (COMADEM '10), pp. 333–340, July 2010.
[4]
H. Zhang and S.-J. Wang, “Extraction of failure characteristic of rolling element bearing based on wavelet transform under strong noise,” Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 169–172, 2005.
[5]
Z. Ge, U. Kruger, L. Lamont, L. Xie, and Z. Song, “Fault detection in non-Gaussian vibration systems using dynamic statistical-based approaches,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 2972–2984, 2010.
[6]
D. Ruan, D. Roverso, P. F. Fantoni, J. I. Sanabrias, J. A. Carrasco, and L. Fernandez, “Integrating cross-correlation techniques and neural networks for feedwater flow measurement,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 43, no. 1–4, pp. 267–274, 2003.
[7]
S.-D. Choi, B. Akin, M. M. Rahimian, and H. A. Toliyat, “Fault diagnosis implementation of induction machines based on advanced digital signal processing techniques,” in Proceedings of the 24th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC '09), pp. 957–963, Washington, DC, USA, February 2009.
[8]
K. Fujiwara, M. Kano, and S. Hasebe, “Correlation-based spectral clustering for flexible soft-sensor design,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Dynamics and Control of Process Systems (DYCOPS '10), pp. 703–708, Leuven, Belgium, July 2010.
[9]
H. Geisler and R. A. Guinee, “A novel correlation tester for multicore power cable fault finding and identification using pseudonoise sequences,” in Proceedings of the 44th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC '09), pp. 1–5, 2009.
[10]
J. D. Jiang, J. Chen, and L. S. Qu, “The application of correlation dimension in gearbox condition monitoring,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 223, no. 4, pp. 529–541, 1999.
[11]
J. Parlar, “Vibration analysis and vibrating screens: theory and practice,” Paper AAINR74029, ETD Collection for Mcmaster University, 2011.
[12]
M. R. Napolitano, V. Casdorph, C. Neppach, S. Naylor, M. Innocenti, and G. Silvestri, “Online learning neural architectures and cross-correlation analysis for actuator failure detection and identification,” International Journal of Control, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 433–455, 1996.
[13]
P. Rajamani, D. Dey, and S. Chakravorti, “Cross-correlation aided wavelet network for classification of dynamic insulation failures in transformer winding during impulse test,” IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 521–532, 2011.
[14]
S. Wu and J. Q. Sun, “Cross-level fault detection and diagnosis of building HVAC systems,” Building and Environment, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1558–1566, 2011.
[15]
S. Wu and J.-Q. Sun, “Cross-level fault detection and diagnosis of building HVAC systems,” Building and Environment, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1558–1566, 2011.
[16]
H. Sohn, K. Worden, and C. R. Farrar, “Novelty detection under changing environmental conditions,” in Smart Structures and Materials 2001: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, 108, vol. 4330 of Proceedings of SPIE, Newport Beach, Calif, USA, March 2001.
[17]
F. K. Choy, S. Huang, J. J. Zakrajsek, R. F. Handschuh, and D. P. Townsend, “Vibration signature analysis of a faulted gear transmission system,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 289–295, 1996.
[18]
C. Kar and A. R. Mohanty, “Vibration and current transient monitoring for gearbox fault detection using multiresolution Fourier transform,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 311, no. 1-2, pp. 109–132, 2008.
[19]
N. Roy and R. Ganguli, “Filter design using radial basis function neural network and genetic algorithm for improved operational health monitoring,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 154–169, 2006.
[20]
N. Roy and R. Ganguli, “Helicopter rotor blade frequency evolution with damage growth and signal processing,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 283, no. 3–5, pp. 821–851, 2005.
[21]
M. A. Timusk, M. G. Lipsett, and C. K. Mechefske, “Automated duty cycle classification for online monitoring systems,” in Proceedings of the 1st Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise, Parts A, B, and C, vol. 1, pp. 563–573, September 2007.
[22]
M. Timusk, M. Lipsett, and C. K. Mechefske, “Fault detection using transient machine signals,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1724–1749, 2008.
[23]
M. A. Timusk, “A unified method for anomaly detection in unsteady systems,” in Proceedings 21st Canadian Machinery Vibration Association Vibration Seminar, 2006.
[24]
M. A. Timusk, C. K. Mechefske, and M. Lipsett, “A pragmatic framework for on-line neural network based detection of machinery,” International Journal of COMADEM, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2005.
[25]
K. Worden, H. Sohn, and C. R. Farrar, “Novelty detection in a changing environment: regression and inter polation approaches,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 258, no. 4, pp. 741–761, 2002.
[26]
J. McBain and M. Timusk, “System identification for fault detection in variable speed and load machinery,” International Journal of Condition Monitoring, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 32–39, 2012.
[27]
M. Verhaegen, Filtering and System Identification: A Least-Squares Approach, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[28]
R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, Pattern Classification, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2001.
[29]
M. Timusk, D. Crymble, and J. McBain, “An integrated flexible platform for development of fault detection systems and duty cycle simulation,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management (COMADEM '10), pp. 373–376, July 2010.
[30]
C. K. Mechefske and L. Liu, “Fault detection and diagnosis in variable speed machines,” International Journal of COMADEM, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 29–40, 2002.
[31]
M. Markou and S. Singh, “Novelty detection: a review—part 2: neural network based approaches,” Signal Processing, vol. 83, no. 12, pp. 2499–2521, 2003.
[32]
M. Markou and S. Singh, “Novelty detection: a review—part 1: statistical approaches,” Signal Processing, vol. 83, no. 12, pp. 2481–2497, 2003.
[33]
D. M. J. Tax and R. P. W. Duin, “Support vector domain description,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 20, no. 11–13, pp. 1191–1199, 1999.
[34]
K. P. Bennett and C. Campbell, “Support vector machines: hype or hallelujah?” ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2000.