全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A New Flux Splitting Scheme Based on Toro-Vazquez and HLL Schemes for the Euler Equations

DOI: 10.1155/2014/827034

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This paper presents a new flux splitting scheme for the Euler equations. The proposed scheme termed TV-HLL is obtained by following the Toro-Vazquez splitting (Toro and Vázquez-Cendón, 2012) and using the HLL algorithm with modified wave speeds for the pressure system. Here, the intercell velocity for the advection system is taken as the arithmetic mean. The resulting scheme is more accurate when compared to the Toro-Vazquez schemes and also enjoys the property of recognition of contact discontinuities and shear waves. Accuracy, efficiency, and other essential features of the proposed scheme are evaluated by analyzing shock propagation behaviours for both the steady and unsteady compressible flows. The accuracy of the scheme is shown in 1D test cases designed by Toro. 1. Introduction Today, upwind schemes undoubtedly have become the main spatial discretization techniques used for solving the Euler/Navier-Stokes equations. Indeed, an interesting feature of these schemes is that the discretization of the equations on a mesh is performed according to the direction of propagation of information on that mesh. They are categorized [1] into two major family schemes, namely, flux vector splitting (FVS) and flux difference splitting (FDS). Concerning the flux difference splitting schemes (FDS), they are based on the difference in the decomposition of fluxes, constructed on an approximated solution of the local Riemann problem between two adjacent states. There are several FDS schemes formulated in the literature among which are the Roe and HLL numerical schemes. The HLL scheme developed by Harten-Lax-Van Leer is a direct approximation of the numerical flux to compute Godunov flux [2]. It has been shown that the HLL scheme is very efficient and robust, has an entropy satisfaction property, resolves isolated shock exactly, and preserves positivity [2–4]. Unfortunately, the main demerit of the HLL scheme is that it cannot resolve contact discontinuity exactly. Another well-known FDS scheme is Roe’s scheme [5] largely used because of its accuracy, quality, and mathematical clarity. Unfortunately, Roe’s scheme admits rarefaction shocks that do not satisfy the entropy condition and sometimes gives rise to spurious solutions such as carbuncle phenomena and odd-even decoupling [6]. To improve the quality of solutions, Quirk proposed a strategy to use combined fluxes so that a dissipative approach can be used in the shock regions [7]. In contrast, the flux vector splitting (FVS) has proven to be a simple and useful technique for arriving at upwind differencing and is

References

[1]  P. L. Roe, “A survey of upwind differencing techniques,” in 11th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, vol. 323 of Lecture Notes in Physics, pp. 69–78, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1989.
[2]  S. K. Godunov, “A difference method for numerical calculation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of hydrodynamics,” Matematicheskii Sbornik, vol. 47 (89), pp. 271–306, 1959.
[3]  A. Harten, P. D. Lax, and B. van Leer, “On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws,” SIAM Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35–61, 1983.
[4]  B. Einfeldt, “On Godunov-type methods for gas dynamics,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 294–318, 1988.
[5]  P. L. Roe, “Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 357–372, 1981.
[6]  J. J. Quirk, ICASE Report 92-64, 1992.
[7]  J. J. Quirk, “A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 555–574, 1994.
[8]  J. L. Steger and R. F. Warming, “Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gasdynamic equations with application to finite-difference methods,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 263–293, 1981.
[9]  W. K. Anderson, J. L. Thomas, and B. Van Leer, “Comparison of finite volume flux vector splittings for the Euler equations,” AIAA Journal, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1453–1460, 1986.
[10]  M.-S. Liou and J. Steffen, “A new flux splitting scheme,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 23–39, 1993.
[11]  M. S. Liou and Y. Wada, “A flux splitting scheme with high-resolution and robustness for discontinuities,” AIAA Paper 94-0083, 1994.
[12]  M.-S. Liou, “A sequel to AUSM: AUSM+,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 364–382, 1996.
[13]  K. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, and O. H. Rho, “An improvement of AUSM schemes by introducing the pressure-based weight functions,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 311–346, 1998.
[14]  K. H. Kim, C. Kim, and O.-H. Rho, “Methods for the accurate computations of hypersonic flows. I. AUSMPW+scheme,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 38–80, 2001.
[15]  M.-S. Liou, “A sequel to AUSM, part II: AUSM+-up for all speeds,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 137–170, 2006.
[16]  J. R. Edwards, “A low-diffusion flux-splitting scheme for Navier-Stokes calculations,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 635–659, 1997.
[17]  J. R. Edwards, R. K. Franklin, and M.-S. Liou, “Low-diffusion flux-splitting methods for real fluid flows with phase transitions,” AIAA Journal, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1624–1633, 2000.
[18]  S.-W. Ihm and C. Kim, “Computations of homogeneous-equilibrium two-phase flows with accurate and efficient shock-stable schemes,” AIAA Journal, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 3012–3037, 2008.
[19]  E. F. Toro and M. E. Vázquez-Cendón, “Flux splitting schemes for the Euler equations,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 70, pp. 1–12, 2012.
[20]  S. F. Davis, “Simplified second-order Godunov-type methods,” SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 445–473, 1988.
[21]  E. F. Toro, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 1999.
[22]  R. P. Fedkiw, T. Aslam, B. Merriman, and S. Osher, “A non-oscillatory Eulerian approach to interfaces in multimaterial flows (the ghost fluid method),” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 457–492, 1999.
[23]  X. Y. Hu and B. C. Khoo, “An interface interaction method for compressible multifluids,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 198, no. 1, pp. 35–64, 2004.
[24]  X. Y. Hu, B. C. Khoo, N. A. Adams, and F. L. Huang, “A conservative interface method for compressible flows,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 219, no. 2, pp. 553–578, 2006.
[25]  R. Abgrall and S. Karni, “Computations of compressible multifluids,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 169, no. 2, pp. 594–623, 2001.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133