全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Numerical Study of the Generic Sports Utility Vehicle Design with a Drag Reduction Add-On Device

DOI: 10.1155/2014/785294

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

CFD simulations using ANSYS FLUENT 6.3.26 have been performed on a generic SUV design and the settings are validated using the experimental results investigated by Khalighi. Moreover, an add-on inspired by the concept presented by Englar at GTRI for drag reduction has been designed and added to the generic SUV design. CFD results of add-on model and the basic SUV model have been compared for a number of aerodynamic parameters. Also drag coefficient, drag force, mean surface pressure, mean velocities, and Cp values at different locations in the wake have been compared for both models. The main objective of the study is to present a new add-on device which may be used on SUVs for increasing the fuel efficiency of the vehicle. Mean pressure results show an increase in the total base pressure on the SUV after using the device. An overall reduction of 8% in the aerodynamic drag coefficient on the add-on SUV has been investigated analytically in this study. 1. Introduction Sports utility vehicles are known worldwide for their ruggedness and high passenger capacity. Their ability to run on both off-road and on-road conditions makes them very peculiar for usage. Due to their high utility, a need for making them more fuel efficient has arisen in the past few years. The following data shows the average miles per gallon statistics for cars and SUVs. The increase in the fuel efficiency is due to improvements in the aerodynamics of the automobiles. For the SUVs the average miles per gallon has been fairly increasing in the past few years as shown in Figure 1. The need of lowering down the aerodynamic drag on the SUVs in order to further increase the average miles per gallon has been the issue for the future work. Figure 1: Average miles per gallon for automobiles in US from 1970 to 2006. Aerodynamic effects on a running SUV play a substantial role in their fuel efficiency. Efforts have been made for making the SUVs aerodynamically and fuel efficient by using a variety of add-on devices and other methods. Shape cannot be much compromised for the basic purpose of the SUV. Hence methods to alter the air flow over the surface of the SUV by using devices or by blowing air in the rear region of the SUV are widely used for drag reduction. Form drag or the pressure drag contributes to the 90% of the total drag [1] on the bluff bodies and can be reduced using the add-on devices. A great amount of research has been done in the field of add-on devices on SUVs and pick-up trucks for reduction in drag forces by altering the air flow around and behind the vehicle. Some of the

References

[1]  G. K. Suryanarayana, H. Pauer, and G. E. A. Meier, “Bluff-body drag reduction by passive ventilation,” Experiments in Fluids, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 73–81, 1993.
[2]  J. Englar Robert, “Advanced Aerodynamic Devices to Improve the Performance, Economics, Handling and Safety of Heavy Vehicles,” SAE 2001-01-2072, Georgia Tech Research Institute Aerospace Transportation & Advanced Systems Lab, 2001.
[3]  P. M. van Leeuwen, Computational analysis of base drag reduction using active flow control [Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering], Delft University of Technology, 2009.
[4]  A. Lamond, J. J. Kennedy, and M. T. Stickland, “An investigation into unsteady base bleed for drag reduction in bluff two-box SUV's,” in Proceedings of the 4th European Automotive Simulation Conference (EASC '09), Munich, Germany, 2009.
[5]  Y. A. Sevilla, Drag reduction of sport utility vehicle using vortex generators [M.S. thesis], California State University, Sacramento, Calif, USA, 2012.
[6]  P. N. Krishnani, CFD study of drag reduction of a generic sport utility vehicle [Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering], California State University, Sacramento, Calif, USA, 2009.
[7]  E. M. Wahba, H. Al-Marzooqi, M. Shaath, M. Shahin, and T. El-Dhmashawy, “Aerodynamic drag reduction for ground vehicles using lateral guide vanes,” CFD Letters, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 68–79, 2012.
[8]  K. Bahram, S. Zhang, C. Koromilas et al., “Experimental and computational study of unsteady wake flow behind a bluff body with a drag reduction device,” SAE 2001-01B-207, 2001.
[9]  A. M. Al-Garni, L. P. Bernal, and B. Khalighi, “Experimental investigation of the flow around a generic SUV,” SAE 2004-01-0228, 2004.
[10]  M. H. Coanda, “Propelling device,” French Patent no. 796843, 1936.
[11]  Fluent Deutschland, Best Practice Guidelines for Handling Automotive External Aerodynamics with FLUENT, Version 1.2, Fluent Deutschland, Darmstadt, Germany, 2005.
[12]  T. Gustavsson and T. Melin, “Application of Vortex generators to a blunt body,” Technical Report KTH, Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2006.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133