Objective: It is important and helpful for surgeons to understand the correlation between spinal anatomy and screw trajectory before surgery. We aimed to assess a simple technique using 3D imaging software available on the hospital intranet for visual and quantitative feedback to prepare surgeons for an appropriate entry point and safe trajectory when placing cervical screws. Methods: A total of 59 cervical screws were inserted from C1 to T1 in 12 consecutive patients using this technique. First, a single CT optimal slice was selected from 3D CT images of the cervical spine to determine the intervals of bilateral entry points and lateral angle. Next, this 3D image was rotated to the lateral angle. Finally, bone was cut out on the entry point using subtractive manipulation, which removed the core of the pedicle or lateral mass. Screw trajectory was indicated, and surgeons could assess the correlation between surface landmarks, spinal anatomy, and screw trajectory. Posterior cervical fusion was performed using fluoroscopy. Postoperative outcomes and incidence of complications were retrospectively assessed. Results: One perforation (1.4%) was identified on postoperative CT images. No vascular injuries occurred. Differences in the intended entry point location and lateral angle of the screw from actual postoperative values were 1.49 ± 1.23 mm and 5.46。 ± 4.46。, respectively. Conclusions: A novel 3D CT imaging assessment underwent in cervical screw fixation. This technique is easily accessible on the hospital intranet and provides training in cervical screw placement for fellows. Surgeons can simulate screw placement and share surgical strategy.
References
[1]
Karaikovic, E.E., Daubs, M.D., Madsen, R.W. and Gaines Jr., R.W. (1997) Morphologic Characteristics of Human Cervical Pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 22, 493-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199703010-00005
[2]
Ludwig, S.C., Kramer, D.L., Balderston, R.A., Vaccaro, A.R., Foley, K.F. and Albert, T.J. (2000) Placement of Pedicle Screws in the Human Cadaveric Cervical Spine: Comparative Accuracy of Three Techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, 1655-1667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200007010-00009
[3]
Panjabi, M.M., Duranceau, J., Goel, V., Oxland, T. and Takata, K. (1991) Cervical Human Vertebrae. Quantitative Three-Dimensional Anatomy of the Middle and Lower Regions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 16, 861-869.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199108000-00001
[4]
Jones, E.L., Heller, J.G., Silcox, D.H. and Hutton, W.C. (1997) Cervical Pedicle Screws versus Lateral Mass Screws. Anatomic Feasibility and Biomechanical Comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 22, 977-982.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199705010-00009
[5]
Kotani, Y., Cunningham, B.W., Abumi, K. and McAfee, P.C. (1994) Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Stabilization Systems. An Assessment of Transpedicular Screw Fixation in the Cervical Spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 19, 2529- 2539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199411001-00007
[6]
Yoshihara, H., Passias, P.G. and Errico, T.J. (2013) Screw-Related Complications in the Subaxial Cervical Spine with the Use of Lateral Mass versus Cervical Pedicle Screws: A Systematic Review. Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine, 19, 614-623. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2013.8.SPINE13136
[7]
Kast, E., Mohr, K., Richter, H.P. and Borm, W. (2006) Complications of Transpedicular Screw Fixation in the Cervical Spine. European Spine Journal, 15, 327-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0861-7
[8]
Neo, M., Fujibayashi, S., Miyata, M., Takemoto, M. and Nakamura, T. (2008) Vertebral Artery Injury during Cervical Spine Surgery: A Survey of More than 5600 Operations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 33, 779-785.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816957a7
[9]
Neo, M., Sakamoto, T., Fujibayashi, S. and Nakamura, T. (2005) The Clinical Risk of Vertebral Artery Injury from Cervical Pedicle Screws Inserted in Degenerative Vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 2800-2805.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000192297.07709.5d
[10]
Abumi, K. and Kaneda, K. (1997) Pedicle Screw Fixation for Nontraumatic Lesions of the Cervical Spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 22, 1853-1863. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199708150-00010
[11]
Abumi, K., Shono, Y., Ito, M., Taneichi, H., Kotani, Y. and Kaneda, K. (2000) Complications of Pedicle Screw Fixation in Reconstructive Surgery of the Cervical Spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, 962-969.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200004150-00011
[12]
Ito, Y., Sugimoto, Y., Tomioka, M., Hasegawa, Y., Nakago, K. and Yagata, Y. (2008) Clinical Accuracy of 3D Fluoroscopy-Assisted Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion. Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine, 9, 450-453.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/SPI.2008.9.11.450
[13]
Kotani, Y., Abumi, K., Ito, M. and Minami, A. (2003) Improved Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion. Journal of Neurosurgery, 99, 257-263.
[14]
Lee, G.Y., Massicotte, E.M. and Rampersaud, Y.R. (2007) Clinical Accuracy of Cervicothoracic Pedicle Screw Placement: A Comparison of the “Open” Lamino-Foraminotomy and Computer-Assisted Techniques. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 20, 25-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000211239.21835.ad
[15]
Richter, M., Cakir, B. and Schmidt, R. (2005) Cervical Pedicle Screws: Conventional versus Computer-Assisted Placement of Cannulated Screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 2280-2287.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000182275.31425.cd
[16]
Klein, S., Whyne, C.M., Rush, R. and Ginsberg, H.J. (2009) CT-Based Patient-Specific Simulation Software for Pedicle Screw Insertion. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 22, 502-506.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819877fd
[17]
Luciano, C.J., Banerjee, P.P., Bellotte, B., Oh, G.M., Lemole Jr., M., Charbel, F.T., et al. (2011) Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator with Haptic Feedback. Neurosurgery, 69, 14-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821954ed
[18]
Podolsky, D.J., Martin, A.R., Whyne, C.M., Massicotte, E.M., Hardisty, M.R. and Ginsberg, H.J. (2010) Exploring the Role of 3-Dimensional Simulation in Surgical Training: Feedback from a Pilot Study. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 23, e70-e74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181d345cb