价值观对政府信任与矿业开发态度关系的调节作用
The Relationship between Trust in Government and Attitude toward Mining: Moderated by Values

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2014.47122, PP. 947-955

Keywords: 矿业开发态度，价值观，政府信任，环境
Attitude toward Mining, Values, Trust in Government, Environment

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的：考察政府信任与矿业开发态度之间的关系，并探索价值观的调节作用。方法：用问卷法对非矿区居民的政府信任、矿业开发态度和价值观进行调查。共收回有效问卷595份，其中男性292名，女性303名，平均年龄为35岁，标准差为9.87。结果：公众政府信任处于中等水平，与年龄显著正相关；对矿业开发持中立略偏向接受的态度；政府信任对矿业开发态度有正向的预测作用。价值观能够调节二者之间的关系，利己主义价值观和利他主义价值观能够增强政府信任的预测作用，生态主义价值观会减弱这一预测作用。
The present study aimed to examine the relationship between trust in government and people’s attitude toward mining, and explore the moderating role of value. 595 participants including 292 male and 303 female completed the questionnaire. Their mean age is 35, and the standard devia-tion is 9.87. It has worked out that people’s trust in government stays at a medium state and is re-lated to age, while their attitude toward mining is also neutral. Trust in government can lead to acceptance of mining, while age, gender and value are controlled. Furthermore, egoistic values and altruistic values can enhance the relationship between trust in government and attitude toward mining, but biospheric values will weaken it.

References

[1]	梅付春, 张陆彪(2008). 禽流感疫区散养户对扑杀补偿政策配合意愿的实证分析. 纪念农村改革开放30周年学术研讨会暨建所50周年庆典, 北京, 2008年12月11日, 173-177.
[2]	任晓佳(2012). 风险信息的认知对政府信任的影响. 硕士学位论文, 吉林: 吉林大学.
[3]	史红民(2004). 中国政府信任研究. 硕士学位论文, 郑州: 郑州大学.
[4]	Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in govern-ment: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 239-256.
[5]	Citrin, J., & Muste, C. (1999). Trust in gov-ernment. Measures of Political Attitudes, 2, 465.
[6]	Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structure and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450-471.
[7]	Dutcher, D. D., Finley, J. C., Luloff, A. E., & Johnson, J. B. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. En-vironmental and Behavior, 39, 474-493.
[8]	Hazkowicz, S, A., Heyenga, S., & Moffat, K. (2011). The relationship be-tween mining and socio-ecnomic well being in Australia’s regions. Resources Policy, 36, 30-38.
[9]	Joireman, J. A., Lasane, T. P., Bennett, J., Richards, D., & Solaimani, S. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of pro-environmental behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 133-155.
[10]	Rudolph, T. J., & Evans, J. (2005). Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 660-671.
[11]	Schultz, P. W., Zelezny, L. C. & Dalrymple, N. J. (2000). A multinational perspective on the relation between Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 32, 576-591.
[12]	Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 415-425.
[13]	Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
[14]	Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65-84.
[15]	Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.

Full-Text