大学生一般自我效能感、自我和谐与应对方式的关系研究
A Correlation Study among General Self-Efficacy, Self Consistency and Congruence and Coping Styles in College Students

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2014.47115, PP. 889-895

Keywords: 大学生，一般自我效能感，自我和谐，应对方式
College Students, General Self-Efficacy, Self Consistency and Congruence, Coping Styles

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的：探讨大学生一般自我效能感、自我和谐与应对方式的特点以及相互关系。方法：采用一般自我效能感量表(GSES)、自我和谐量表(SCCS)及简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)对272名大学生进行测评。结果：(1) 大学生的一般自我效能感、自我和谐与应对方式均处于中等水平；(2) 在性别方面：大学生一般自我效能感存在显著差异，男生明显比女生的得分高(t = 4.30, p < 0.01)；在自我和谐的刻板性维度上存在显著差异，男生明显比女生的得分高(t = 3.60, p < 0.01)；在专业方面：大学生在应对方式的积极应对维度存在显著差异，文科生明显比理科生得分高(t = 2.63, p < 0.01)；(3) 一般自我效能感与积极应对呈显著正相关(r = 0.45, p < 0.01)；自我和谐与积极应对呈显著负相关(r = ？0.23, p < 0.01)，与消极应对呈显著正相关(r = 0.41, p < 0.01)；结论：一般自我效能感、自我和谐能预测应对方式，两个回归模型的回归方程分别为：积极应对方式 = 1.45 + 0.37 × 一般自我效能感 ？ 0.004 × 自我和谐，消极应对方式 = ？0.21 + 0.02 × 自我和谐。
Objective: To explore college student’s characteristics of general self-efficacy, self consistency and congruence and coping styles, and the relations among the three variables. Method: 272 college students were evaluated with General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), self consistency and congruence scale (SCCS) and simplified coping style questionnaire (SCSQ). Results: (1) College students’ general self-efficacy, self consistency and congruence and coping styles are in the medium level; (2) There were significant differences between different genders in general self-efficacy (t = 4.30, p < 0.01) and self stereotyping (t = 3.60, p < 0.01); there are significant differences between liberal arts students and science major students (t = 2.63, p < 0.01); (3) General self-efficacy had positive correlated to positive coping styles (r = 0.45, p < 0.01); self consistency and congruence had negative correlated to positive coping styles (r = ？0.23, p < 0.01), and had positive correlated to negative coping styles (r = 0.41, p < 0.01). Conclusions: College students’ general self-efficacy, self consistency and congruence can predict coping styles, the two regression equations of regression models are: positive coping styles = 1.45 + 0.37 × general self-efficacy ？ 0.004 × self consistency and congruence, negative coping styles = ？0.21 + 0.02 × self consistency and congruence.

References

[1]	甘景梨, 张万恒, 赵亚男, 高存友, 吕存生, 杨春, 汤松伟, 杨代德(2004). 心理训练对军人自我和谐等因素的影响. 中国心理卫生杂志, 5期, 311-313.
[2]	李志凯, 崔冠宇(2006). 本科大学生自我和谐及其与应对方式的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 4期, 380-382.
[3]	孙淑晶, 赵富才(2008). 大学生一般自我效能感、应对方式与社交焦虑的关系研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 3期, 305- 307.
[4]	汪向东, 王希林, 马弘(1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版) (pp. 82-83, 127-131). 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社.
[5]	王才康(2001). 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究. 应用心理学, 1期, 37-40.
[6]	王才康, 刘勇(2000). 一般自我效能感与特质焦虑、状态焦虑和考试焦虑的相关研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 4期, 229- 230.
[7]	王晓一, 李薇, 张红(2013). 唐山大学生自我和谐与一般自我效能感的相关研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 4期, 630-631.
[8]	原凯歌, 刘航(2011). 大学生家庭环境、一般自我效能感和应对方式的相关研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 3期, 361-363.
[9]	Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationship as developed in the client-centened framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology. A Study of Science (pp. 184-256). New York: McGraw Hill.

Full-Text