全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Block Hybrid -Step Backward Differentiation Formulas for Large Stiff Systems

DOI: 10.1155/2014/162103

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This paper presents a generalized high order block hybrid -step backward differentiation formula (HBDF) for solving stiff systems, including large systems resulting from the semidiscretization parabolic partial differential equations (PDEs). A block scheme in which two off-grid points are specified by the zeros of the second degree Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind is examined for convergence, and stabilities. Numerical simulations that illustrate the accuracy of a Chebyshev based method are given for selected stiff systems and partial differential equations. 1. Introduction We consider the first order differential equation where , , , satisfies a Lipschitz condition, and the eigenvalues of the Jacobian have negative real parts (see [1]). It is well known that the system (1) is better handled by methods with larger stability intervals. In particular, -stable methods are of great importance. However, for very large systems arising from the semidiscretization of parabolic PDEs, -stable methods converge very slowly to the exact solution. Hence, we seek methods which are at least -stable for efficiently solving (1) when the system is very large (see Cash [2]). The development of continuous methods has been the subject of growing interest due to the fact that continuous methods enjoy certain advantages, such as the potential for them to provide defect control (see Enright [3]) as well as having the ability to generate additional methods, which are combined and applied in block form (see Onumanyi et al. [4, 5], Akinfenwa et al. [6], and Jator [7]). The majority of block methods which are due to Shampine and Watts [8], Chartier [9], Rosser [10], and Chu and Hamilton [11] are generally implemented in the predictor-corrector mode. In this paper, we adopt a different approach where the solution is simultaneously provided in each block (see Jator et al. [12], Jator [7, 13]) without the use of predictors from other methods. It is unnecessary to make a function evaluation at the initial part of the new block since at all blocks (with the exception the first block) the first function evaluation is already available from the previous block. The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 states the generalized block HBDF, its derivation from continuous approximation, and how to generate specific members of the scheme. The HBDFs are bundle as main and additional methods, a concept that is due to Brugnano and Trigiante [14]. In Section 3 we study the stability of the schemes with emphasis on a Chebyshev based member. In Section 4 a numerical algorithm for the block

References

[1]  L. W. Jackson and S. K. Kenue, “A fourth order exponentially fitted method,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 11, pp. 965–978, 1974.
[2]  J. R. Cash, “Two new finite difference schemes for parabolic equations,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 433–446, 1984.
[3]  W. H. Enright, “Continuous numerical methods for ODEs with defect control,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 125, no. 1-2, pp. 159–170, 2000.
[4]  P. Onumanyi, U. W. Sirisena, and S. N. Jator, “Continuous finite difference approximations for solving differential equations,” International Journal of Computer Mathematics, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 1999.
[5]  P. Onumanyi, D. O. Awoyemi, S. N. Jator, and U. W. Sirisena, “New linear multistep methods with continuous coefficients for first order initial value problems,” Journal of the Nigerian Mathematical Society, vol. 13, pp. 37–51, 1994.
[6]  O. A. Akinfenwa, S. N. Jator, and N. M. Yao, “Continuous block backward differentiation formula for solving stiff ordinary differential equations,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 996–1005, 2013.
[7]  S. N. Jator, “On the hybrid method with three off-step points for initial value problems,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 110–118, 2010.
[8]  L. F. Shampine and H. A. Watts, “Block implicit one-step methods,” Mathematics of Computation, vol. 23, pp. 731–740, 1969.
[9]  P. Chartier, “-stable parallel one-block methods for ordinary differential equations,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 552–571, 1994.
[10]  J. D. Rosser, “A Runge-kutta for all seasons,” SIAM Review, vol. 9, pp. 417–452, 1967.
[11]  M. T. Chu and H. Hamilton, “Parallel solution of ODE's by multi-block methods,” SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 342–353, 1987.
[12]  S. N. Jator, S. Swindell, and R. French, “Trigonometrically fitted block Numerov type method for ,” Numerical Algorithms, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2013.
[13]  S. N. Jator, “Leaping type algorithms for parabolic partial differential equations,” in International Conference on Scientific Computing, Abuja, Nigeria, August 2011.
[14]  L. Brugnano and D. Trigiante, Solving Differential Problems by Multistep Initial and Boundary Value Methods, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1998.
[15]  S. O. Fatunla, “Block methods for second order IVPs,” International Journal of Computer Mathematics, vol. 41, pp. 55–63, 1991.
[16]  P. Henrici, Discrete Variable Methods in ODEs, John Wiley & Sons, 1962.
[17]  P. Amodio and F. Mazzia, “Boundary value methods based on Adams-type methods,” Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 18, no. 1–3, pp. 23–35, 1995.
[18]  J. M. Vaquero and J. Vigo-Aguiar, “Exponential fitted Runge-Kutta methods of collocation type based on Gauss, Radau, and Labatto traditional methods,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational and Mathematical Methods in Science and Engineering (CMMSE '07), pp. 289–303, 2007.
[19]  R. Jeltsch, “Multistep methods using higher derivatives and damping at infinity,” Mathematics of Computation, vol. 31, no. 137, pp. 124–138, 1977.
[20]  J. D. Lambert, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
[21]  H. Ramos and J. Vigo-Aguiar, “A fourth-order runge-kutta method based on BDF-type chebyshev approximations,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. 124–136, 2007.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133