|
|
国际情绪图片系统的评估方式研究——以年轻成人为例
|
Abstract:
国际情绪图片系统的发展是为了提供大量标准化，能激发情绪且可以跨国使用的包含广泛语意类别的照片。国际情绪图片系统的研发者使用自我评定模型“一种非语文的图形评估技术”来测量参与者在图片的愉悦度、唤醒度和控制度上的反应。本研究的目的是检验自我评定模型与九点量表间的差异与相关。研究对象：26位受试者平均分为两组，每组针对72张IAPS照片在间隔4周以九点量表与SAM量表分别进行评估，但两组施测顺序采对抗平衡设计。研究结果：对于年轻成人两种评估方式在愉悦度、唤醒度和控制度皆有良好的内部一致性，且两种评估方式的结果没有明显差异。结论与建议：两种方式在年轻成人评估IAPS时都适用，但本研究也存在受试者控制度评估变异较大，未能对年轻成人以外的群体进行两种方式比较的限制，建议欲应用本研究结果时应注意前述限制。
The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) was developed to provide a large set of standardized, emotionally evocative, internationally accessible photographs from a wide range of semantic categories. The researcher used the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), a non-verbal pictorial assessment technique, to measure the pleasure, arousal and dominance associated with the effects of IAPS on the participants. The aim of the present study was to check the difference and any correlation between SAM and a nine-point Likert scale. Twenty-six university students (aged 18-30 years) participated and evaluated 72 pictures twice over four weeks from IAPS using the SAM scale and a nine-point
| [1] | 王莹, 许晶, 张炳蔚, 冯霞(2008). 国际情绪图片系统在116名中国老年人中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 22期, 903907. |
| [2] | 胡少华, 魏宁, 郭文滔, 胡健波, 谭云飞, 许毅(2005). 中国和美国健康成人情感反应差异的跨文化研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 13期, 265-267. |
| [3] | 蒋世光, 谭伟象, 花茂棽, 陈畹兰, 张兆贤(2012). 国际情绪图片系统在台湾年轻成人的适用性与其分类方式探讨. 中华心理学刊, 54期, 495-510. |
| [4] | Backs, R.W., Silva, S.P.D., & Han, K. (2005). A comparison of younger and older adults’ self-assessment manikin ratings of affective pictures. Experi-mental Aging Research, 31, 421-440. |
| [5] | Bradley, M.M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B.N., & Lang, P.J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. [Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. Emotion, 1, 276-298. |
| [6] | Bradley, M.M., & Lang, P.J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49-59. |
| [7] | Bradley, M.M., & Lang, P.J. (2007b). The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment (pp. 29-46). New York: Oxford University Press. |
| [8] | Grühn, D., & Scheibe, S. (2008). Age-related differences in valence and arousal ratings of pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Do ratings become more extreme with age? Behavior Research Methods, 40, 512-521. |
| [9] | Kline, P. (2000). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd Edition). London: Routledge. |
| [10] | Lang, P.J. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In J. B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery Systems (pp. 119-l37). Norwood: Ablex. |
| [11] | Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. (1997) In P. J. Lang, R. F. Simons, & M. Balaban, Eds., Attention and Orienting, Sensory and Motivational Processes. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 97-135. |
| [12] | Lang, P.J., Greenwald, M.K., Bradley, M.M. & Hamm, A.O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Evaluative, facial, visceral, and behavioral responses. Psychophysiology, 30, 261-273. |
| [13] | Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Af-fective rating of pictures and instruction manual Technical Report A-6. Gainesville: University of Florida. |
| [14] | Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J.A. (1974). The basic emotional impact of environments. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 38, 283301. |
| [15] | Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illi-nois. |
| [16] | Silva, J.R. (2011). International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in Chile: A cross-cultural adaptation and va-lidation study. Terapia Psicológica, 29, 251-258. |
| [17] | Wundt, W.M. (1894). Lectures on human and animal psychology. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing. |
