全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

任务经验对学习时间分配策略转移的影响
The Effects of Task Experience on Strategy Shifts in the Allocation of Study Time

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2013.36044, PP. 292-297

Keywords: 任务经验;学习时间分配;策略转移;议程;权衡
Task Experience
, Study-Time Allocation, Strategy Shift, Agenda, Trade-Off

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本研究采Dunlosky范式,以80名大学生为被试,选择困难5分和容易1分两类项目,通过4个试次的学习测试过程,探讨权衡情境下任务经验对学习时间分配策略转移的影响。结果发现,在有提示和无提示条件下,随着任务经验的增加,被试均更多地重学高测试项目,困难5分组实现策略转移的比例分别为58%39%,容易1分组实现策略转移的比例分别是20%18%。结果表明:学习时间分配的权衡决策随着任务经验的增加而变化;然而,大部分被试未能实现策略转移。In this study, we adopted the Dunlosky’s paradigm, took 81 college students as the participants and chose two kinds of item (5-point difficult and 1-point easy item) through four study-test trials to explore the effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time under the trade-off situation. The results found that with the increase of task experience, participants selected more high test item to restudy in 2 experiments, the proportions of the strategy shift in 5-point difficult groups were 58% and 39%, the proportions of the strategy shift in 1-point easy groups were 20% and 18%. Those results indicated that the trade-off decision of study-time allocation changed with the increase of task experience, while most of

References

[1]  陈海德(2011). 项目难度与分值对学习时间分配的影响. 浙江师范大学硕士论文, 金华.
[2]  李伟健, 蔡任娜, 陈海德, 汪磊, 王敏敏(印刷中). 项目难度与分值对自定步调学习时间的影响. 心理科学.
[3]  李伟健, 家晓余, 陈海德, 黄杰, 蔡任娜, 曹玮等(印刷中). 自定步调学习时间的习惯性反应:来自眼动的证据. 心理科学.
[4]  李晓明, 傅小兰(2004). 情绪性权衡困难下的决策行为. 心理科学进展, 12期, 801-808.
[5]  贾宁, 白学军, 臧传丽, 阎国利(2008). 学习时间分配机制的眼动研究. 心理科学, 31期, 93-96.
[6]  牛勇(2006). 权衡困难情境下的学习时间分配决策. 中国科学院博士学位论文, 北京.
[7]  Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 432-447.
[8]  Ariel, R. (2012). Learning what to learn: The effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time. Kent State University, Kent.
[9]  Ariel, R., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study? Memory & Cognition, 41, 416-428.
[10]  Castel, A. D., Murayama, K., Friedman, M. C., McGillivray, S., & Link, I. (2013). Selecting valuable information to remember: Age-Related differences and similarities in self-regulated learning. Psychology and Aging, 28, 232-242.
[11]  Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves. In: Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C., Eds., Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 249-275). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
[12]  Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2000). Updating knowledge about encoding strategies: A componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience. Psychology and Aging, 15, 462.
[13]  Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 779-788.
[14]  Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011). Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. In Ross, B. H., Ed., The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 103-140). San Diego: Academic.
[15]  Hertzog, C., Price, J., & Dunlosky, J. (2008). How is knowledge generated about memory encoding strategy effectiveness? Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 430-445.
[16]  Hertzog, C., Price, J., Burpee, A., Frentzel, W. J., Feldstein, S., & Dunlosky, J. (2009). Why do people show minimal knowledge updating with task experience: Inferential deficit or experimental artifact? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 155-173.
[17]  Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 349.
[18]  Metcalfe, J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2010). People’s study time allocation and its relation to animal foraging. Behavioural Processes, 83, 213-221.
[19]  Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In: Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P., Eds., Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1-25). Cambridge: MIT Press.
[20]  Price, J., & Murray, R. G. (2012). The region of proximal learning heuristic and adult age differences in self-regulated learning. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1120.
[21]  Thiede, K. T., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024-1037.
[22]  Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2012). The effectiveness of updating metacognitive knowledge in the elderly: Evidence from metamnemonic judgments of word frequency. Psychology and Aging, 27, 683.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133