Gravitational Lagrangians as derived by Fock for the Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann approach, and by Kennedy assuming only a fourth rank tensor interaction, contain long range interactions. Here we investigate how these affect the local dynamics when integrated over an expanding universe out to the Hubble radius. Taking the cosmic expansion velocity into account in a heuristic manner it is found that these long range interactions imply Mach’s principle, provided the universe has the critical density, and that mass is renormalized. Suitable higher order additions to the Lagrangians make the formalism consistent with the equivalence principle. 1. Introduction and Outline We start by presenting the gravitational Lagrangians that form the basis of the present formalism in Section 2. After that we point out how the local equations of motion for a particle will be affected by the long range interactions with the other particles in the universe. Consistency demands that the only quantities that enter are velocities and accelerations relative to the rest of the universe. This is Mach’s principle. After that, in Section 4, the long range effects are calculated by integration over the universe as a whole out to the Hubble radius, where the expansion velocity reaches the speed of light. In Section 5 Mach’s principle is found to be obeyed provided the density is the critical density ( ). The original masses of the theory then, however, turn out to be renormalized. This problem is dealt with in Section 6 where it is shown that the addition of certain higher order terms in the gravitational coupling constant restores the usual interpretation of mass and the gravitational constant. In this way the formalism as a whole is consistent with both Mach’s principle and the equivalence principle. 2. Gravitational Lagrangians Fock [1] found the Lagrangian that yields the Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann (EIH) equations of motion [2–4]. Modern derivations and discussions of this approach can be found in Landau and Lifshitz [5], Hirondel [6], Nordtvedt [7], Brumberg [8], and Louis-Martinez [9], among others. These are all based on general relativity and Hirondel’s is the shortest. Here we will, however, focus on the profound work by Kennedy [10] on approximately relativistic interactions and their Lagrangians. Kennedy first derives the (special) relativistic Lagrangian for one particle interacting with another particle with constant given velocity. In a second step one then wishes to combine such Lagrangians into a single two-body Lagrangian, symmetric in the particle indices. To do this it
References
[1]
V. Fock, The Theory of Space Time and Gravitation, Pergamon Press, London, UK, 1959.
[2]
A. Einstein, L. Infeld, and B. Hoffmann, “The gravitational equations and the problem of motion,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 65–100, 1938.
[3]
A. Eddington and G. L. Clark, “Clark. The problem of n bodies in general relativity theory,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 166, pp. 465–475, 1938.
[4]
L. Infeld and J. Plebański, Motion and Relativity, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1960.
[5]
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, Vol. 2, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 4th edition, 1975.
[6]
D. Hirondel, “Special relativity in general relativity?” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1471–1473, 1973.
[7]
K. Nordtvedt, “A post-newtonian gravitational lagrangian formalism for celestial body dynamics in metric graivity,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 297, Article ID 390404, pp. 390–404, 1985.
[8]
V. Brumberg, “On derivation of EIH (Einstein-Infeld-Hoffman) equations of motion from the linearized metric of general relativity theory,” Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 245–252, 2007.
[9]
D. J. Louis-Martinez, “Relativistic action-at-a-distance description of gravitational interactions?” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 4, Article ID 045009, pp. 1–11, 2012.
[10]
F. J. Kennedy, “Approximately relativistic interactions,” The American Journal of Physics, vol. 40, pp. 63–74, 1972.
[11]
C. G. Darwin, “The dynamical motions of charged particles,” Philosophical Magazine Series 6, vol. 39, no. 233, pp. 537–551, 1920.
[12]
J. B. Barbour and H. Pfister, Eds., Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity, Birkh?user, Boston, Mass, USA, 1995.
[13]
B. Mashhoon, F. Gronwald, and H. I. M. Lichtenegger, “Gravitomagnetism and the clock effect,” in Gyros, Clocks, Interferometers…: Testing Relativistic Graviy in Space, C. L?mmerzahl, C. W. F. Everitt, and F. W. Hehl, Eds., vol. 562 of Lecture Notes in Physics, pp. 83–108, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001.
[14]
L. Iorio, H. I. M. Lichtenegger, M. L. Ruggiero, and C. Corda, “Phenomenology of the Lense-Thirring effect in the solar system,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 331, pp. 351–395, 2011.
[15]
A. K. T. Assis, Relational Mechanics, Apeiron, Montreal, Canada, 1999.
[16]
I. Ciufolini and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation and Inertia, Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1995.
[17]
J. A. Peacock, Cosmological Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1999.
[18]
T. Cheng, Relativity, Gravitation and Cosmology: A Basic Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2nd edition, 2010.
[19]
?. G. Gr?n and E. Eriksen, “Translational inertial dragging,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 105–124, 1989.
[20]
H. I. Hartman and C. Nissim-Sabat, “Reply to “the principle of relativity and inertial dragging” by ?. G. Gr?n,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 381–382, 2009.
[21]
?. G. Gr?n, “The principle of relativity and inertial dragging,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 373–380, 2009.
[22]
E. G. Harris, “Analogy between general relativity and electromagnetism for slowly moving particles in weak gravitational fields,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 421–425, 1991.
[23]
B. R. Holstein, “Gyroscope precession and general relativity,” The American Journal of Physics, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 1248–1256, 2001.
[24]
R. J. Hughes, “On Feynman's proof of the Maxwell equations,” The American Journal of Physics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 301–306, 1992.
[25]
D. Lynden-Bell, J. Bicák, and J. Katz, “On accelerated inertial frames in gravity and electromagnetism,” Annals of Physics, vol. 271, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1999.
[26]
J. Martin, A. F. Ranada, and A. Tiemblo, “On Mach's principle: inertia as gravitation,” http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0703141v1.
[27]
J. David Nightingale, “Specific physical consequences of Mach's principle,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 45, pp. 376–379, 1977.
[28]
J. David Nightingale and J. R. Ray, “Comment on ‘Specific physical consequences of Mach’s principle’,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 46, p. 586, 1978.
[29]
B. Vet?, “Gravity probe B experiment and gravitomagnetism,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1123–1130, 2010.
[30]
B. Vet?, “Gravitomagnetic field of the universe and Coriolis force on the rotating Earth,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1323–1329, 2011.
[31]
C. W. F. Everitt, D. B. Debra, B. W. Parkinson et al., “Gravity probe B: final results of a space experiment to test general relativity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, Article ID 221101, 2011.
[32]
I. Clutolini and E. C. Pavils, “A confirmation of the general relativistic prediction of the Lens-Thirring effect,” Nature, vol. 431, pp. 958–960, 2004.
[33]
H. Essen, “Mechanics, cosmology and Mach's principle,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 34, pp. 139–145, 2013.
[34]
M. Gogberashvili, “On the dynamics of the ensemble of particles in the thermodynamic model of gravity,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.0376v1.
[35]
A. Harvey, “Dark energy and the cosmological constant: a brief introduction,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 877–889, 2009.
[36]
T. F. Jordan, “Cosmology calculations almost without general relativity,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 73, pp. 653–662, 2005.
[37]
A. E. Chubykalo and S. J. Vlaev, “Theorem on the proportionality of inertial and gravitational masses in classical mechanics,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1998.