全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays) Response to Planting Pattern and Herbicide Program with High Seeding Rates in North Carolina

DOI: 10.1155/2014/261628

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Effective weed control in corn (Zea mays L.) is important to optimize yield. Concern over environmental impact of atrazine and selection for glyphosate resistance has increased the need to develop alternative strategies that use herbicides other than atrazine and glyphosate and appropriate cultural practices to control weeds. Research was conducted during 2011 and 2012 to determine weed and corn response to herbicide programs containing dicamba, glufosinate, and glyphosate applied postemergence alone or with atrazine in single- and twin-row planting patterns. Planting pattern had no effect on common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) and Texas panicum (Panicum texanum L.) population and did not interact with herbicide program. Effective weed control hastened maturity in some but not all instances. Under weed-free conditions, corn grain yield was higher in 5 of 7 trials when planted in twin rows versus single rows at equivalent corn populations (141,000 plants?ha?1). These results suggest that while planting pattern may not impact weed control dramatically, planting corn in twin rows may be an effective alternative to single-row planting patterns because of increased yield under high corn populations. 1. Introduction Effective weed management continues to be important in obtaining optimum corn yields [1]. Common ragweed is among the top ten most common weeds in corn in North Carolina [2]. Other troublesome broadleaf weeds include Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby) [2]. Texas panicum is considered one of the most troublesome weeds in corn production in the southeast US [3]. Several herbicides control Texas panicum in corn but not always completely [3–5]. Atrazine controls many broadleaf weeds and some grasses in corn and can be applied preplant incorporated (PPI), preemergence (PRE), or postemergence (POST) [6, 7]. Although used on many hectares in the US [8], atrazine is no longer used in Europe because of concern of endocrine disruption in amphibians [9]. Residues of atrazine have been found in groundwater and surface water [10] and use of atrazine continues to be reviewed by the EPA in the US [7]. Development of herbicide-resistant biotypes has increased challenges in managing weeds in corn and other agronomic crops [11]. To decrease the likelihood of development of herbicide-resistant biotypes, rotation of herbicide modes of action is essential and should be coupled with cultural practices that minimize reproduction of

References

[1]  G. W. Bird, K. M. Maredia, D. Dakouo, and D. Mota-Sanchez, “Role of integrated pest management and sustainable development,” in Integrated Pest Management in the Global Arena, pp. 73–85, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 2003.
[2]  T. M. Webster, “Weed survey-southern states,” Proceedings Southern Weed Science Society, vol. 53, pp. 247–252, 2000.
[3]  E. P. Prostko, T. L. Grey, and J. W. Davis, “Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) control in irrigated field corn (Zea mays) with foramsulfuron, glyphosate, nicosulfuron, and pendimethalin,” Weed Technology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 961–964, 2006.
[4]  W. C. Johnson III and B. G. Mullinix, “Efficacy and economic analysis of Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) management systems in corn (Zea mays),” Weed Technology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 754–758, 1990.
[5]  W. E. Thomas, I. C. Burke, and J. W. Wilcut, “Weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn with glyphosate, halosulfuron, and mesotrione,” Weed Technology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 826–834, 2004.
[6]  M. R. Obermeier and G. Kapusta, “Postemergence broadleaf weed control in corn (Zea mays) with CGA-152005,” Weed Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 689–698, 1996.
[7]  H. M. LeBaron, J. E. McFarland, and O. C. Burnside, The Trizaine Herbicides: A Milestone in the Development of Weed Control Technology, The Triazine Herbicides, 50 Years Revolutionizing Agriculture, 2008.
[8]  F. Ackerman, “The economics of atrazine,” International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 441–449, 2007.
[9]  T. B. Hayes, K. Haston, M. Tsui, A. Hoang, C. Haeffele, and A. Vonk, “Atrazine-induced hermaphroditism at 0.1?ppb in American leopard frogs (Rana pipiens): laboratory and field evidence,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 568–575, 2003.
[10]  B. T. Croll, “Pesticides in surface waters and groundwaters,” Journal of the Institution of Water and Environmental Management, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 389–395, 1991.
[11]  J. S. Holt and H. M. LeBaron, “Significance and distribution of herbicide resistance,” Weed Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 141–149, 1990.
[12]  J. Gressel and L. A. Segel, “Modelling the effectiveness of herbicide rotations and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance,” Weed Technology, vol. 4, pp. 186–198, 1990.
[13]  G. R. Stephenson, M. D. Dykstra, R. D. McLaren, and A. S. Hamill, “Agronomic practices influencing triazine-resitant weed distribution in Ontario,” Weed Technology, vol. 4, pp. 199–207, 1990.
[14]  V. K. Nandula, K. N. Reddy, S. O. Duke, and D. H. Poston, “Glyphosate-resistant weeds: current status and future outlook,” Outlooks on Pest Management, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 183–187, 2005.
[15]  I. Heap, “The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds,” 2013, http://www.weedscience.org.
[16]  N. Soltani, C. Shropshire, and P. H. Sikkema, “Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) control in corn,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 577–581, 2011.
[17]  W. Everman, “Weed control in corn,” in North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual, vol. AG-1, pp. 224–230, 2014.
[18]  S. D. Askew and J. W. Wilcut, “Cost and weed management with herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum),” Weed Technology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 308–313, 1999.
[19]  J. L. Corbett, S. D. Askew, W. E. Thomas, and J. W. Wilcut, “Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate,” Weed Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 443–453, 2004.
[20]  A. S. Culpepper, A. C. York, R. B. Batts, and K. M. Jennings, “Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max),” Weed Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 77–88, 2000.
[21]  W. G. Duncan, “The relationship between corn population and yield,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 50, pp. 82–84, 1958.
[22]  W. G. Duncan, “A theory to explain the relationship between corn population and grain yield,” Crop Science, vol. 24, pp. 1141–1145, 1984.
[23]  P. H. Sikkema, R. E. Nurse, T. Welacky, and A. S. Hamill, “Reduced herbicide rates provide acceptable weed control regardless of corn planting strategy in Ontario field corn,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 373–378, 2008.
[24]  J. R. Teasdale, “Influence of narrow row/high population corn (Zea mays) on weed control and light transmittance,” Weed Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 113–118, 1995.
[25]  J. R. Teasdale, “Influence of corn (Zea mays) population and row spacing on corn and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) yield,” Weed Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 447–453, 1998.
[26]  A. M. Hashemi, S. J. Herbert, and D. H. Putnam, “Yield response of corn to crowding stress,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 839–846, 2005.
[27]  E. E. N. A. Bonaparte and R. I. Brawn, “Effects of plant density and planting date on leaf number and some developmental events in corn,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 56, pp. 691–698, 1976.
[28]  M. J. Ottman and L. F. Welch, “Planting patterns and radiation interception, plant nutrient concentration, and yield in corn,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 81, pp. 167–174, 1989.
[29]  D. M. Lambert and J. Lowenberg-DeBoer, “Economic analysis of row spacing for corn and soybean,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 564–573, 2003.
[30]  Z. Ghafar and A. K. Watson, “Effect of corn population on the growth of yellow nutsedge,” Weed Science, vol. 31, pp. 588–592, 1983.
[31]  S. M. McLachlan, M. Tollenaar, C. J. Swanton, and S. F. Weise, “Effect of corn-induced shading on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and architecture of redroot pigweed,” Weed Science, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 568–573, 1993.
[32]  G. A. Johnson, T. R. Hoverstad, and R. E. Greenwald, “Integrated weed management using narrow corn row spacing, herbicides, and cultivation,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 1998.
[33]  H. A. Bruns, M. W. Ebelhar, and H. K. Abbas, “Comparing single-row and twin-row corn production in the Mid South,” Crop Management, vol. 11, no. 1, 2012.
[34]  W. J. Grichar, “Row spacing, plant populations, and cultivar effects on soybean production along the Texas Gulf Coast,” Crop Management, vol. 6, no. 1, 2007.
[35]  H. A. Bruns, “Comparisons of single-row and twin-row soybean production in the Mid-South,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 702–708, 2011.
[36]  H. A. Bruns, “Planting date, rate, and twin-row vs. single-row soybean in the mid-south,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 1308–1313, 2011.
[37]  H. Gozubenli, M. Kilinc, O. Sener, and O. Konuskan, “Effects of single and twin row planting on yield and yield components in maize,” Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 203–206, 2004.
[38]  M. J. Novacek, S. C. Mason, T. D. Galusha, and M. Yaseen, “Twin rows minimally impact irrigated maize yield, morphology, and lodging,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 268–276, 2013.
[39]  K. A. Nelson and R. L. Smoot, “Twin- and single-row corn production in northeast Missouri,” Crop Management, 2009.
[40]  E. W. Hauser and G. A. Buchanan, “Influence of row spacing, seeding rates, and herbicide systems on the competitiveness and yield of peanuts,” Peanut Science, vol. 8, pp. 78–81, 1981.
[41]  E. W. Hauser and G. A. Buchanan, “Production of peanuts as affected by weed competition and row spacing,” Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, vol. 538, p. 35, 1982.
[42]  G. Wehtje, R. H. Walker, M. G. Patterson, and J. A. McGuire, “Influence of twin rows on yield and weed control in peanuts,” Peanut Science, vol. 11, pp. 88–91, 1984.
[43]  J. E. Lanier, D. L. Jordan, J. F. Spears et al., “Peanut response to planting pattern, row spacing, and irrigation,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 1066–1072, 2004.
[44]  K. N. Reddy, I. C. Burke, J. C. Boykin, and J. Ray Williford, “Narrow-row cotton production under irrigated and non-irrigated environment: plant population and lint yield,” Journal of Cotton Science, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 48–55, 2009.
[45]  K. N. Reddy and J. C. Boykin, “Weed control and yield comparisons of twin- and single-row glyphosate-resistant cotton production systems,” Weed Technology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 95–101, 2010.
[46]  E. J. Sadler, P. J. Bauer, and W. J. Busscher, “Site-specific analysis of a droughted corn crop: I. Growth and grain yield,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 395–402, 2000.
[47]  N. Stetzel, K. Wise, B. Nielsen, and C. Gerber, Arrested Ear Development in Hybrid Corn, Purdue Extension Publication, BP-85-W, West Lafayette, Ind, USA, 2011.
[48]  L. J. Abendroth, R. W. Elmore, M. J. Boyer, and S. K. Marlay, Corn Growth and Development, Iowa State University Cooperative Extension Publication, Ames, Iowa, USA, 2011.
[49]  M. E. Otegui, “Kernel set and flower synchrony within the ear of maize: II. Plant population effects,” Crop Science, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 448–455, 1997.
[50]  D. Mueller and R. Pope, Corn Field Guide, Iowa State University Cooperative Extension Service, 2009.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133