This study aimed at providing answers to
two key questions: 1) Which subjects are most preferred by students in secondary
schools? 2) What are the reasons behind the students’ interest, or lack thereof,
in particular subjects? The study employed qualitative methodology using a
multiple case study holistic design. The students in the studied schools served
as the unit of analysis. The study involved a sample of 18 secondary schools
that were purposefully selected. Data were collected using focus group
discussions, observation and documentary review. The analysis involved the use
of the Miles and Huberman’s model of qualitative data analysis. The findings
show that the majority of students in secondary schools preferred arts subjects
notably because of the challenges they experience in learning science. The reasons
for students preference of a particular subject included the inspiration from
significant others, commitment and support provided by the subject teachers,
the availability of teachers and their teaching approaches and relevance of the
subject to their daily life experiences. On the basis of these findings, it is
recommended that the government should create a conducive learning environment,
especially for community secondary schools, that will allow students to select
subjects on the basis of their ability and interests.
References
[1]
Stefan, M. and Ciomon, F. (2010) The 8th and 9th Grades Students’ Attitudes toward Teaching and Learning Physics. Acta Didactics Napocensia, 3, 7-14.
[2]
Gardner, P. and Tamir, P. (1989) Interest in Biology. Part I: A Multidimensional Construct. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 409-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260506
[3]
Ministry of Education and Vocational Training (2006) Education Circular No. 1 of 2005 about Curriculum Changes in Secondary Education.
[4]
National Examinations Council of Tanzania (2014) Examinations Results Statistics for CSEE 2013. Issued by the Department of Information and Communication Technology, February 21st 2014.
[5]
Granstr?m, K. (2006) Group phenomenon and classroom Management. In: Evertson, C.M and Weinstein, C.S., Eds., Handbook for Classroom Management: Research, Practice and Contemporary Issues, Erlbaum, New York, 1141- 1160.
[6]
Oppendekker, M.C. and Van Damme, J. (2006) Teacher Characteristics and Teaching Styles as Effectiveness Enhancing Factors of Classroom Practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1-21.
[7]
Yin, R.K. (2008) Case Study Research Designs and Methods. 4rd Edition, SAGE, Lon-don.
[8]
Miles, B. and Huberman, A. (1994) An Expanded Sourcebook Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd Edition, SAGE, London.
[9]
Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, G.E. (2000) The Only Generalization Is There Is No Generalization. In: Gomm, R., Hammersley, M. and Foster, P., Eds., Case Study Method, SAGE, London, 27-45.
[10]
Akintade, B.O. (2012) Considering the Determinants of selecting Geography as a Discipline: The case of Senior Secondary School Students in Ilorin, Nigeria. Ozean Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 1-8.
[11]
Athanasou, J.A. and Petoumenos, K. (1998) Which Components of Instruction Influence Student Interest? Australia Journal of Teacher Education, 23, 61-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.1998v23n2.5
[12]
Samuelsson, J. (2010) The Impact of Teaching Approaches on Stu-dents’ Mathematical Proficiency in Sweden. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 5, 61-78.
[13]
Wenchao, J., Alastair, M. and Luke, S. (2010) Subject and Course Choices at Ages 14 and 16 amongst Young People in England: Insights from Behavioral Economics. Research Report DFE-RR 160.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/182677/DFE-RR160.pdf