There is continuing
controversy regarding the most effective and safest technique for breast
reduction surgery. This case series describes our experience with a breast
reduction approach that combines three techniques aimed at addressing three
different aspects of breast reduction: skin reduction, shaping, and nipple
areolar complex shaping. We assessed the perioperative course and postoperative
outcomes (for a mean of 19 months) of 10 consecutive women who underwent breast
reduction surgery involving a combination of three techniques: “inverted T”
skin reduction, modified Hall-Findley supero-medial pedicle for glandular
reduction, and inferior de-epithelialized flap (modified “Foustanos” flap) for
molding and improved shaping of the breast. The final bra cup size was C or D
in all patients. The overall results were graded as excellent in four patients
and very good in six patients. Each patient was completely satisfied with her
surgery. Six patients developed venous congestion of the nipple areolar
complex, which resolved within 24 - 48 hours after surgery. Two patients had
uneventful delayed wound healing in the vertical scar of the inverted T
pattern. There was a 100% nipple areolar complex survival rate. No patient had
a major adverse event, permanently altered nipple areolar complex sensitivity,
or bottoming out of the lower pole. None required revision surgery. This case
series confirms our expectations that the solution to questions about breast
reduction methods may depend on melding different techniques into a single
procedure. The combination of techniques herein described was both effective
and safe. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.
References
[1]
Clark, C., Whang, S. and Paige, K.T. (2009) Incidence of Precancerous Lesions in Breast Reduction Tissue: A Pathologic Review of 562 Consecutive Patients. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 124, 1033-1039.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b45801
[2]
Kerrigan, C.L. and Slezak, S.S. (2013) Evidence-Based Medicine: Reduction Mammoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 132, 1670-1683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a807ec
[3]
Abramson, D.L., Pap, S., Shifteh, S. and Glasberg, S.B. (2005) Improving Long-Term Breast Shape with the Medial Pedicle Wise Pattern Breast Reduction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 115, 1937-1943.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000165085.23537.A7
[4]
Graf, R. and Biggs, T.M. (2002) In Search of Better Shape in Mastopexy and Reduction Mammoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 110, 309-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200207000-00053
[5]
Spear, S.L. and Mijidian, A. (1998) Reduction Mammaplasty and Mastopexy: General Considerations. In: Spear, S.L., Ed., Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 673-684.
[6]
Wise, J. and Robert, J. (1956) A Preliminary Report on a Method of Planning the Mammaplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 17, 367-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-195605000-00004
[7]
Finger, R.E., Vasquez, B., Drew, G.S. and Given, K.S. (1989) Superomedial Pedicle Technique of Reduction Mammaplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 83, 471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198903000-00012
[8]
Hall-Findlay, E. (2002) Vertical Breast Reduction with a Medially-Based Pedicle. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 22, 185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/maj.2002.123052
[9]
Nahabedian, M.Y., McGibbon, B.M. and Manson, P.N. (2000) Medial Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty for Severe Mammary Hypertrophy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 105, 896.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200003000-00011
[10]
Ribeiro, L. (1975) A New Technique for Reduction Mammaplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 55, 330-334.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197555030-00010
[11]
Foustanos, A. and Zavrides, H. (2007) A Double-Flap Technique: An Alternative Mastopexy Approach. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120, 55-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000263320.57385.a2
[12]
Bonomi, S., Salval, A., Settembrini, F., Gregorelli, C., Musumarra, G. and Rapisarda, V. (2012) Inferiorly Based Parenchymal Flap Mammaplasty: A Safe, Reliable, and Versatile Technique for Breast Reduction and Mastopexy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 130, 116e-125e. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b552
[13]
Hall-Findlay, E.J. (2012) Discussion: Inferiorly Based Parenchymal Flap Mammaplasty: A Safe, Reliable, and Versatile Technique for Breast Reduction and Mastopexy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 130, 126e-127e.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b486
[14]
Bonomi, S., Settembrini, F., Salval, A., Musumarra, G. and Gregorelli, C. (2012) How to Improve Shape and Projection in Mastopexy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 29, 758e-759e.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318245e865
[15]
Hall-Findlay, E.J. (2013) Discussion: A Matched Cohort Study of Superomedial Pedicle Vertical Scar Breast Reduction (100 Breasts) and Traditional Inferior Pedicle Wise-Pattern Reduction (100 Breasts): An Outcomes Study over 3 Years. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 132, 1077-1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a48bb4
[16]
Lockwood, T. (1999) Reduction Mammaplasty and Mastopexy with Superficial Fascial System Suspension. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 103, 1411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199904020-00009