Background: It has been suggested that hypertrophic eminence on the medial head of the
first metatarsal is a component of the patho-anatomy of hallux valgus. However,
research findings in this area are inconsistent, possibly due to differences in
methods in identifying and measuring the medial eminence. To date, reliability
of any method of measurement has not been reported. The purpose of this study
was to determine the reliability of measurement of the medial eminence on
medial oblique and dorsoplantar radiographs using a
previously described geometric technique. Methods: To evaluate the reliability of a method of measurement of the medial eminence
of the first metatarsal duplicate standardized dorsoplantar and medial oblique
radiographs were taken of one foot of 15 subjects. The feet included both
rectus feet and subjects with hallux valgus. The medial eminence was measured
on the digital images using Inteleviewer 2.5 (Intelerad medical systems
incorporated, Montreal, Quebec) software. Observer 1 measured one randomly
selected image from each subject to determine inter-observer reliability.
Observer 2 measured all images to determine the overall intraobserver
reliability. Reliability was calculated using intra-class correlation
coefficients (ICC). Results: The mean projection
of the medial eminence ranged from 0.39 to 0.44 cm in both views. The ICCs were
calculated for the dorsoplantar view and the 2 medial oblique view measures
between observers. They ranged from 0.76 intra-rater and 0.86 interrater in the
dorsoplantar view to 0.80 intra-rater and 0.90 inter-rater in the medial
oblique view indicating good reliability in all measures. The average of the 4
oblique views also showed a high level of reliability with a coefficient of
0.96. Conclusions: The medial eminence
can be reliably measured in the medial oblique and dorsoplantar view using the
described technique. The medial
References
[1]
Schweitzer, M.A., Maheshwarie, S. and Shabshin, N. (1999) Hallux Valgus and Hallux Rigidus: MRI Findings. Clinical Imaging, 23, 397-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0899-7071(00)00167-4
[2]
Thordarson, D.B. and Krewer, P. (2002) Medial Eminence Thickness with and without Hallux Valgus. Foot and Ankle International, 23, 48-50.
[3]
Mann, R. and Coughlin, M.J. (1994) Adult Hallux Valgus. In: Mann, R. and Coughlin, M.J., Eds., Surgery of the Foot and Ankle (6th Edition), St. Louis, Mosby, 175.
[4]
Resch, S., Ryd, L., Strenstrom, A., Johnsson, K. and Kristbjorn, R. (1995) Measuring Hallux Valgus: A Comparison of Conventional Radiography and Clinical Parameters with Regard to Measurement Accuracy. Foot and Ankle International, 16, 267-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107110079501600504
[5]
Bryant, J. (2001) A Comparison of Radiographic Foot Measurements Taken in Two Different Positions. Journal of the Podiatric Medical Association, 81, 234-238.
[6]
Christman, R.A. and Ly, P. (1990) Radiographic Anatomy of the First Metatarsal. Journal of the Podiatric Medical Association, 90, 177-203.
[7]
Martin, D. and Pontious, J. (2001) Introduction and Evaluation of Hallux Abducto Valgus. In: Banks, A.S., Downey, M.S., Martin, D.E., Miller. McGlarmry’s Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Vol 1 (3rd Edition), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 484.
[8]
Brand, P.W. and Coleman, W.C. (1984) A Standard for Dorsal Plantar and Lateral Radiographic Projections of the Feet. Orthopedics, 10, 117-120.
[9]
Panchbhavi, V.K. and Trevino, S. (2004) Comparison between Manual and Computer-Assisted Measurements of Hallux Valgus Parameters. Foot and Ankle International, 25, 708-711.
[10]
Bryant, A., Tinley, P. and Singer, K. (2000) A Comparison of Radiographic Measurements in Normal, Hallux Valgus, and Hallux Limitus Feet. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 39, 39-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1067-2516(00)80062-9
[11]
Ballinger, P.W. (1999) Merrill’s Atlas of Radiographic Positions and Radiologic Procedures. 9th Edition, St Louis, Mosby, 177.
[12]
Portney, L.G. and Watkins, M.P. (1993) Interpretation of the Intraclass Coefficients. In: Foundations of Clinical Research Applications to Practice: Appleton & Lange, 199, 513-514.
[13]
May, S., Littlewood, C. and Bishop, A. (2006) Reliability of Procedures in the Physical Examination of Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 52, 91-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(06)70044-7