Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of E3030, a Novel Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α/γ Dual Agonist, in Healthy Japanese Male Subjects
Objective: The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the
safety of single oral dose E3030 in healthy Japanese male subjects, and to
evaluate pharmacokinetics after single oral dose E3030 and food effect on pharmacokinetic
profiles. Methods: This study was conducted in a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, ascending single-dose study in 56 healthy Japanese male
subjects. Subjects were orally administeredE3030 (0.5-40 mg) or placebo. Results: Six of 42
(14%) subjects’ administered E3030 experienced
adverse events; however, all adverse events were mild and transient, and there
was no dose-dependent increase in any adverse event. Plasma samples were
collected over 96 hours after dosing. After administration in the fasted state,
Cmax of E3030 was achieved between 1.00 and 1.75 hours, indicating
rapid absorption. Both Cmax and AUC were dose-proportional in the range of 0.5 to 40 mg. The average range of elimination
half-life was 18.4-23.8 hr. CL/F and Vz/F also
remained nearly constant regardless of dose levels. In addition, food effect
was exploratorily evaluated in five subjects of administered
E3030 (10 mg) in both fasted and fed states. The fed/fasted ratios for the
geometric mean of the Cmax and AUC were 0.803 and 0.913,
respectively. Conclusion: E3030 was safe and well tolerated at single doses up
to 40 mg. The pharmacokinetic profile showed good linearity, and food effect on
pharmacokinetics of E3030 was
not significant.
References
[1]
J. A. Dormandy, B. Charbonnel, D. J. Eckland, et al., “Secondary Prevention of Macrovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the PROactive Study (PRO Spective Pioglit Azone Clinical Trial in MacroVascular Events): A Randomised Controlled Trial,” Lancet, Vol. 366, No. 9493, 2005, pp. 1279-1289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67528-9
[2]
A. Keech, R. J. Simes, P. Barter, et al., “Effects of Long-Term Fenofibrate Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in 9795 People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (the FIELD Study): Randomised Controlled Trial,” Lancet, Vol. 366, No. 9500, 2005, pp. 1849-1861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67667-2
[3]
ACCORD Study Group, H. N. Ginsberg, M. B. Elam, L. C. Lovato, et al., “Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 362, No. 17, 2010, pp. 1563-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1001282
[4]
M. Jun, C. Foote, J. Lv, et al., “Effects of Fibrates on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Lancet, Vol. 375 No. 9729, 2010, pp. 1875-1884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60656-3
[5]
S. Kasai, T. Inoue, H. Yoshitomi, et al., “Antidiabetic and Hypolipidemic Effects of a Novel Dual Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) α/γ Agonist, E3030, in db/db Mice and Beagle Dogs,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, Vol. 108, No. 1, 2008, pp. 40-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1254/jphs.FP0072346
[6]
Food and Drug Administration, “Guidance for Industry and Reviewers: Estimating the Safe Starting Dose in Clinical Trials for Therapeutics in Adult Healthy Volunteers,” Draft Guidance, USDHHS, FDA, CDER, CBER, 2002.
[7]
T. Hashimoto, H. Kasai, M. Yamada, et al., “Statistical Assessment of Linear Pharmacokinetics in Clinical Pharmacological Studies,” Xenobiotic Metabolism and Disposition, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2001, pp. 244-252.
[8]
Food and Drug Administration, “Guidance for Industry: Food-Effect Bioavailability and Fed Bioequivalence Studies,” FDA, CDER, 2002.
[9]
T. M. O’Moore-Sullivan and J. B. Prins, “Thiazolidinediones and Type 2 Diabetes: New Drugs for an Old Disease,” Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 176, No. 8, 2002, pp. 381-386.
[10]
R. R. Henry, A. M. Lincoff, S. Mudaliar, et al., “Effect of the Dual Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α/γ Agonist Aleglitazar on Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (SYNCHRONY): A Phase II, Randomised, Dose-Ranging Study,” Lancet, Vol. 374, No. 9684, 2009, pp. 126-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60870-9
[11]
W. C. Roberts, “Safety of Fenofibrate—US and Worldwide Experience,” Cardiology, Vol. 76, No. 3, 1989, pp. 169-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000174488
[12]
G. F. Blane, “Comparative Toxicity and Safety Profile of Fenofibrate and Other Fibric Acid Derivatives,” American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 83, No. Suppl. 5B, 1987, pp. 26-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(87)90868-0
[13]
G. F. Blane, “Review of European Clinical Experience with Fenofibrate,” Cardiology, Vol. 76, No. Suppl. 1, 1989, pp. 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000174541
[14]
B. Davies and T. Morris, “Physiological Parameters in Laboratory Animals and Humans,” Pharmaceutical Research, Vol. 10, No. 7, 1993, pp. 1093-1095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018943613122