全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Validation of the Dynamic Direct Exposure Method for Toxicity Testing of Diesel Exhaust In Vitro

DOI: 10.1155/2013/139512

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Diesel exhaust emission is a major health concern because of the complex nature of its gaseous content (e.g., NO2, NO, CO, and CO2) and high concentration of particulate matter (PM) less than 2.5?μm which allows for deeper penetration into the human pulmonary system upon inhalation. The aim of this research was to elucidate the potential toxic effects of diesel exhaust on a human pulmonary-based cellular system. Validation of a dynamic direct exposure method for both laboratory (230?hp Volvo truck engine) and field (Volkswagen Passat passenger car) diesel engines, at idle mode, was implemented. Human pulmonary type II epithelial cells (A549) grown on porous membranes were exposed to unmodified diesel exhaust at a low flow rate (37.5?mL/min). In parallel, diesel emission sampling was also conducted using real-time air monitoring techniques. Induced cellular effects were assessed using a range of in vitro cytotoxicity assays (MTS, ATP, and NRU). Reduction of cell viability was observed in a time-dependent manner following 30–60?mins of exposure with NRU as the most sensitive assay. The results suggest that the dynamic direct exposure method has the potential to be implemented for both laboratory- and field-based in vitro toxicity studies of diesel exhaust emissions. 1. Introduction Air pollution is a major concern to human health. Epidemiological studies have shown that air pollution poses the greatest human health risks to the young and elderly and those with chronic cardiovascular disease, asthma, or influenza [1–6]. Air pollution is most prevalent in largely populated urban areas such as cities with high-density traffic that consequently poses a higher risk of adverse health effects. Mobile sources such as motor vehicles are the main contributor to urban air pollution, emitting gases, particulates, and/or mixtures of these into the atmosphere. Motor vehicles such as diesel powered passenger vehicles are gaining popularity over the traditional petrol engines as diesel engines have higher fuel efficiency due to the more complete combustion characteristics of the diesel engine. This combustion process is due to the fuel-oxidiser mixing at higher temperatures than these that would occur with a petrol engine [7]. In addition, diesel engines have less CO2 (carbon dioxide) and CO (carbon monoxide) emission although other pollutants such as NO (nitric oxide) and NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) emissions are higher due to the higher temperature resulting in more bonding between nitrogen (N) and oxygen (O2) atoms. Diesel engines produce up to 100 times more particulate

References

[1]  J. Heinrich and R. Slama, “Fine particles, a major threat to children,” International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, vol. 210, no. 5, pp. 617–622, 2007.
[2]  G. Polichetti, S. Cocco, A. Spinali, V. Trimarco, and A. Nunziata, “Effects of particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5 and PM1) on the cardiovascular system,” Toxicology, vol. 261, no. 1-2, pp. 1–8, 2009.
[3]  C. A. Pope III, R. T. Burnett, M. J. Thun et al., “Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 287, no. 9, pp. 1132–1141, 2002.
[4]  C. A. Pope III, R. L. Verrier, E. G. Lovett et al., “Heart rate variability associated with particulate air pollution,” American Heart Journal, vol. 138, no. 5 I, pp. 890–899, 1999.
[5]  N. Englert, “Fine particles and human health—a review of epidemiological studies,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 149, no. 1–3, pp. 235–242, 2004.
[6]  L. C. Green and S. R. Armstrong, “Particulate matter in ambient air and mortality: toxicologic perspectives,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 326–335, 2003.
[7]  W. W. Pulkrabek, Engineering Fundamentals of the Internal Combustion Engine, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1997.
[8]  M. Riedl and D. Diaz-Sanchez, “Biology of diesel exhaust effects on respiratory function,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 221–228, 2005.
[9]  A. Nemmar, M. F. Hoylaerts, P. H. M. Hoet, and B. Nemery, “Possible mechanisms of the cardiovascular effects of inhaled particles: systemic translocation and prothrombotic effects,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 149, no. 1–3, pp. 243–253, 2004.
[10]  T. Herzinger, H. C. Korting, and H. I. Maibach, “Assessment of cutaneous and ocular irritancy: a decade of research on alternatives to animal experimentation,” Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 1995.
[11]  R. D. Combes, “Assessing risk to humans from chemical exposure by using non-animal test data,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 921–924, 2005.
[12]  U. G. Sauer, S. Vogel, A. Hess, et al., “In vivo-in vitro comparison of acute respiratory tract toxicity using human 3D airway epithelial models and human A549 and murine 3T3 monolayer cell systems,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 174–190, 2013.
[13]  S. Bakand and A. Hayes, “Troubleshooting methods for toxicity testing of airborne chemicals in vitro,” Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 76–85, 2010.
[14]  A. J. Cohen and C. A. Pope III, “Lung cancer and air pollution,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 219–224, 1995.
[15]  T. Ohtoshi, H. Takizawa, H. Okazaki et al., “Diesel exhaust particles stimulate human airway epithelial cells to produce cytokines relevant to airway inflammation in vitro,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 778–785, 1998.
[16]  S.-M. Oh and K.-H. Chung, “Identification of mammalian cell genotoxins in respirable diesel exhaust particles by bioassay-directed chemical analysis,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 226–235, 2006.
[17]  Y.-Q. Liu, M. Keane, M. Ensell et al., “In vitro genotoxicity of exhaust emissions of diesel and gasoline engine vehicles operated on a unified driving cycle,” Journal of Environmental Monitoring, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 60–66, 2005.
[18]  M. Aufderheide, “Direct exposure methods for testing native atmospheres,” Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 57, supplement 1, pp. 213–226, 2005.
[19]  S. Bakand, C. Winder, C. Khalil, and A. Hayes, “A novel in vitro exposure technique for toxicity testing of selected volatile organic compounds,” Journal of Environmental Monitoring, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 100–105, 2006.
[20]  D. J. Cooney and A. J. Hickey, “Cellular response to the deposition of diesel exhaust particle aerosols onto human lung cells grown at the air-liquid interface by inertial impaction,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1953–1965, 2011.
[21]  C. Potera, “More human, more humane: a new approach for testing airborne pollutants,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. A148–A151, 2007.
[22]  F. Lestari, A. J. Hayes, A. R. Green, and G. Chattopadhyay, “In vitro cytotoxicity and morphological assessment of smoke from polymer combustion in human lung derived cells (A549),” International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 320–332, 2012.
[23]  Standards Australia, AS, 3570—1998: Automotive Diesel Fuel, S. Australia, Sydney, Australia, 1998.
[24]  Promega, “CellTiter 96 aqueous non-radioactive cell proliferation assay,” Technical Bulletin 169, Promega Corporation, Madison, Wis, USA, 2001.
[25]  F. Lestari, A. J. Hayes, A. R. Green, and B. Markovic, “In vitro cytotoxicity of selected chemicals commonly produced during fire combustion using human cell lines,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 653–663, 2005.
[26]  S. Bakand, C. Winder, and A. Hayes, “Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity assessment of selected gaseous compounds in human alveolar epithelial cells,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1341–1347, 2007.
[27]  C. J. Goodwin, S. J. Holt, S. Downes, and N. J. Marshall, “Microculture tetrazolium assays: a comparison between two new tetrazolium salts, XTT and MTS,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 95–103, 1995.
[28]  E. Borenfreund and J. A. Puerner, “Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 24, no. 2-3, pp. 119–124, 1985.
[29]  Promega, “CellTiter-Glo(R) luminescent cell viability assay,” Technical Bulletin TB288, Promega Corporation, Madison, Wis, USA, 2007.
[30]  S. Bakand, C. Winder, C. Khalil, and A. Hayes, “An experimental in vitro model for dynamic direct exposure of human cells to airborne contaminants,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2006.
[31]  J. Groves and J. R. Cain, “A survey of exposure to diesel engine exhaust emissions in the workplace,” Annals of Occupational Hygiene, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 435–447, 2000.
[32]  M. Aufderheide, J. W. Knebel, and D. Ritter, “Novel approaches for studying pulmonary toxicity in vitro,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 140-141, pp. 205–211, 2003.
[33]  S. Bakand, A. Hayes, and C. Winder, “An integrated in vitro approach for toxicity testing of airborne contaminants,” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health A: Current Issues, vol. 70, no. 19, pp. 1604–1612, 2007.
[34]  M.-D. Cheng, B. Malone, and J. M. E. Storey, “Monitoring cellular responses of engine-emitted particles by using a direct air-cell interface deposition technique,” Chemosphere, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 237–243, 2003.
[35]  N. Tsukue, H. Okumura, T. Ito, G. Sugiyama, and T. Nakajima, “Toxicological evaluation of diesel emissions on A549 cells,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 363–369, 2010.
[36]  F. Lestari, A. R. Green, G. Chattopadhyay, and A. J. Hayes, “An alternative method for fire smoke toxicity assessment using human lung cells,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 605–615, 2006.
[37]  M. Tang, Q. Li, L. Xiao, et al., “Toxicity effects of short term diesel exhaust particles exposure to human small airway epithelial cells (SAECs) and human lung carcinoma epithelial cells (A549),” Toxicology Letters, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 181–192, 2012.
[38]  T. Husoy, T. Syversen, and J. Jenssen, “Comparisons of four in vitro cytotoxicity tests: the MTT assay, NR assay, uridine incorporation and protein measurements,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 149–154, 1993.
[39]  R. J. Riddell, et al., “The importance of exposure period and cell type in in vitro cytotoxicity tests,” ATLA, vol. 14, pp. 86–92, 1986.
[40]  E. Borenfreund, H. Babich, and N. Martin-Alguacil, “Comparisons of two in vitro cytotoxicity assays: the neutral red (NR) and tetrazolium MTT tests,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1988.
[41]  G. Eisenbrand, B. Pool-Zobel, V. Baker et al., “Methods of in vitro toxicology,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 40, no. 2-3, pp. 193–236, 2002.
[42]  CARB, “Briefing paper on interim results and tentative conclusions for ARB's study of emissions from ‘late-model’diesel and CNG heavy-duty transit buses,” 2002, http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/cng-diesel/briefing.pdf.
[43]  DRSTA, “Danish road safety and transport agency. Large scale project with particulate filters on heavy-duty vehicles in Odense,” 2002, http://www.fstyr.dk/Shortcuts/English/Publications.aspx.
[44]  A. Neer and U. O. Koylu, “Effect of operating conditions on the size, morphology, and concentration of submicrometer particulates emitted from a diesel engine,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 146, no. 1-2, pp. 142–154, 2006.
[45]  K. Donaldson, L. Tran, L. A. Jimenez et al., “Combustion-derived nanoparticles: a review of their toxicology following inhalation exposure,” Particle and Fibre Toxicology, vol. 2, article 10, 2005.
[46]  R. Hirota, K. Akimaru, and H. Nakamura, “In vitro toxicity evaluation of diesel exhaust particles on human eosinophilic cell,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 988–994, 2008.
[47]  G. Mazzarella, F. Ferraraccio, M. V. Prati et al., “Effects of diesel exhaust particles on human lung epithelial cells: an in vitro study,” Respiratory Medicine, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 1155–1162, 2007.
[48]  L. Risom, P. M?ller, and S. Loft, “Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage by particulate air pollution,” Mutation Research—Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, vol. 592, no. 1-2, pp. 119–137, 2005.
[49]  S. G. Klein, J. Hennen, T. Serchi, B. Bl?meke, and A. C. Gutleb, “Potential of coculture in vitro models to study inflammatory and sensitizing effects of particles on the lung,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1516–1534, 2011.
[50]  A. Yang, D. L. Cardona, and F. A. Barile, “Subacute cytotoxicity testing with cultured human lung cells,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2002.
[51]  A. Casta?o and M. J. Gómez-Lechón, “Comparison of basal cytotoxicity data between mammalian and fish cell lines: a literature survey,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 695–705, 2005.
[52]  F. Tan, M. Wang, W. Wang, and Y. Lu, “Comparative evaluation of the cytotoxicity sensitivity of six fish cell lines to four heavy metals in vitro,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 164–170, 2008.
[53]  J. M. Veranth, N. S. Cutler, E. G. Kaser, C. A. Reilly, and G. S. Yost, “Effects of cell type and culture media on Interleukin-6 secretion in response to environmental particles,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 498–509, 2008.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133