全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
ISRN Zoology  2013 

Out of Asia: An Allopatric Model for the Evolution of the Domestic Dog

DOI: 10.1155/2013/841734

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The domestication of the dog has been a ripe area of evolutionary speculation for more than 150 years. A wolf ancestry and probable East Asian origin of domestication are now widely accepted. We offer a new allopatric hypothesis for the domestication of dogs that recognizes the importance of isolation in the speciation of the dog from the wolf. Although sympatric isolation during domestication of many other species would not have been problematic, it has always been difficult to keep dogs from breeding with wild canids. Furthermore, wild canids readily hybridize with one another. This would have made it very difficult for an early domestic dog lineage to diverge from the wolf and to evolve into the morphologically, developmentally, and behaviorally distinct species that we recognize today. Our allopatric model is consistent with two subhypotheses: isolation when tamer scavenger wolves followed humans south and away from hunting populations of wolves or isolation when climate forced humans and tamer scavenger wolves into isolated refugia. 1. Introduction and Background The importance of the domestic dog comes not only from the close relationship that humans share with it today, but also because it is the earliest known domesticate, predating any other plant or animal. This unique position as the first domesticate has inspired researchers to ask about the origins of the dog, and the process of its original domestication. The close relationship between the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) and the wolf (Canis lupus) has been recognized and discussed since at least Roman times [1]. Lamark [2] suggested the wolf as the ancestor to the domestic dog, although this hypothesis was dismissed later by Lyell [3]. Darwin [4] suggested multiple origins of domestic dogs from wild canid ancestors in contrast to Wallace’s contention of a single origin. Lorenz’s [5] assertion that there exist two distinct lineages of domestic dogs, descended from both wolves and jackals, has predominated during much of the last century. He based this dichotomy on physical characteristics including size and muzzle shape. Although dogs can successfully interbreed with both wolves and jackals, the dual origin model has been thoroughly discredited in recent years with new molecular phylogenies of the canids indicating wolf ancestry [6–10]. Lorenz’s [11] depiction of the domestication process has, however, persisted. Lorenz’s scenario is that domestication began with the adoption of a wild wolf pup as a pet for a child. We certainly have many examples of orphaned wild animals being reared by

References

[1]  L. M. Wendt, Dogs: A Historical Journey, Macmillan, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
[2]  J. B. Lamark, Zoological Philosophy: An Exposition with Regard to the Natural History of Animals, vol. 1, Dentu, Paris, France, 1809.
[3]  C. Lyell, Principles of Geology, vol. 2, J. Murray, London, UK, 1835.
[4]  C. Darwin, On the Origin of Spcecies, John Murray, London, UK, 1859.
[5]  K. Lorenz, King Solomon's Ring, Harper & Row, New York, NY, USA, 1952.
[6]  C. Vilà, P. Savolainen, J. E. Maldonado et al., “Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog,” Science, vol. 276, no. 5319, pp. 1687–1689, 1997.
[7]  J. A. Leonard, R. K. Wayne, J. Wheeler, R. Valadez, S. Guillén, and C. Vilà, “Ancient DNA evidence for old world origin of New World dogs,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5598, pp. 1613–1616, 2002.
[8]  P. Savolainen, Y.-P. Zhang, J. Luo, J. Lundeberg, and T. Leitner, “Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5598, pp. 1610–1613, 2002.
[9]  E. A. Ostrander and R. K. Wayne, “The canine genome,” Genome Research, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1706–1716, 2005.
[10]  K. Lindblad-Toh, C. M. Wade, T. S. Mikkelsen et al., “Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog,” Nature, vol. 438, no. 7069, pp. 803–819, 2005.
[11]  K. Lorenz, Man Meets Dog, Kodansha International, New York, NY, USA, 1953.
[12]  J. Topál, M. Gácsi, á. Miklósi, Z. Virányi, E. Kubinyi, and V. Csányi, “Attachment to humans: a comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1367–1375, 2005.
[13]  J. London, White Fang, Penguin, London, UK, 1905.
[14]  D. K. Belyaev, “Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication,” The Journal of Heredity, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 301–308, 1979.
[15]  L. N. Trut, “Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment: foxes bred for tamability in a 40-year experiment exhibit remarkable transformations that suggest an interplay between behavioral genetics and development,” American Scientist, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 160–169, 1999.
[16]  L. N. Trut, “Experimental studies of early canid domestication,” in The Genetics of the Dog, CABI Publishing, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
[17]  H. Hemmer, Domestication: The Decline of Environmental Appreciation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1990.
[18]  S. J. Crockford, “Dog evolution: a role for thyroid hormone physiology in domestication changes,” in Dogs through Time: An Archaeological Perspective, S. J. Crockford, Ed., BAR International Series no. 889, Archaeopress, Oxford, UK, 2000.
[19]  P. Saetre, J. Lindberg, J. A. Leonard et al., “From wild wolf to domestic dog: gene expression changes in the brain,” Molecular Brain Research, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 198–206, 2004.
[20]  S. J. Crockford, “A commentary on dog evolution: regional variation, breed development and hybridization with wolves,” in Dogs through Time: An Archaeological Perspective, S. J. Crockford, Ed., BAR International Series no. 889, Archaeopress, Oxford, UK, 2000.
[21]  E. Tchernov and L. K. Horwitz, “Body size diminution under domestication: unconscious selection in primeval domesticates,” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 54–75, 1991.
[22]  D. F. Morey, “The early evolution of the domestic dog,” American Scientist, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 336–347, 1994.
[23]  J. Clutton-Brock, “Origins of the dog: domestication and early history,” in The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour and Interactions with People, J. Serpell, Ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
[24]  C. Manwell and C. Baker, “Domestication of the dog: hunter, food, bed-warmer, or emotional object?” Zeitschrift für Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie, vol. 101, no. 1–5, pp. 241–256, 1984.
[25]  D. Zohary, E. Tchernov, and L. K. Horwitz, “The role of unconscious selection in the domestication of sheep and goats,” Journal of Zoology, vol. 245, no. 2, pp. 129–135, 1998.
[26]  D. Rindos, The Origins of Agriculture: An Evolutionary Approach, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
[27]  R. Coppinger and L. Coppinger, Dogs, Scribner, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
[28]  C. Künzl, S. Kaiser, E. Meier, and N. Sachser, “Is a wild mammal kept and reared in captivity still a wild animal?” Hormones and Behavior, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 187–196, 2003.
[29]  M. E. McNay, “Wolf-human interactions in Alaska and Canada: a review of the case history,” Wildlife Society Bulletin, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 831–843, 2002.
[30]  J. S. Gloyd, “Wolf hybrids—a biological time bomb?” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 201, no. 3, pp. 381–382, 1992.
[31]  J. Hope, “Wolves and wolf hybrids as pets are big business-but a bad idea,” Smithsonian, vol. 25, pp. 34–42, 1994.
[32]  M. V. Sablin and G. A. Khlopachev, “The earliest ice age dogs: evidence from Eliseevichi I,” Current Anthropology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 795–799, 2002.
[33]  R. D. E. MacPhee, A. N. Tikhonov, D. Mol et al., “Radiocarbon chronologies and extinction dynamics of the late Quaternary mammalian megafauna of the Taimyr Peninsula, Russian Federation,” Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1017–1042, 2002.
[34]  J. M. Davis and F. R. Valla, “Evidence for domestication of the dog 12,000 years ago in the Natufian of Israel,” Nature, vol. 276, no. 5688, pp. 608–610, 1978.
[35]  R. Coppinger and R. Schneider, “Evolution of working dogs,” in The Domestic Dog, J. Serpel, Ed., Cambridge Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1995.
[36]  K. Tsuda, Y. Kikkawa, H. Yonekawa, and Y. Tanabe, “Extensive interbreeding occurred among multiple matriarchal ancestors during the domestication of dogs: evidence from inter- and intraspecies polymorphisms in the D-loop region of mitochondrial DNA between dogs and wolves,” Genes and Genetic Systems, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 229–238, 1997.
[37]  J. R. Adams, J. A. Leonard, and L. P. Waits, “Widespread occurrence of a domestic dog mitochondrial DNA haplotype in southeastern US coyotes,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 541–546, 2003.
[38]  P. Ciucci, V. Lucchini, L. Boitani, and E. Randi, “Dewclaws in wolves as evidence of admixed ancestry with dogs,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 81, no. 12, pp. 2077–2081, 2003.
[39]  J. Clutton-Brock and P. Jewell, “Origin and domestication of the dog,” in Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog, W.B. Saunders, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1993.
[40]  S. J. Olsen and J. W. Olsen, “The Chinese wolf, ancestor of new world dogs,” Science, vol. 197, no. 4303, pp. 533–535, 1977.
[41]  S. J. Olsen, Origins of the Domestic Dog: The Fossil Record, University of Arizona Press, Tuscon, Ariz, USA, 1985.
[42]  P. Savolainen, T. Leitner, A. N. Wilton, E. Matisoo-Smith, and J. Lundeberg, “A detailed picture of the origin of the Australian dingo, obtained from the study of mitochondrial DNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 33, pp. 12387–12390, 2004.
[43]  D. K. Sharma, J. E. Maldonado, Y. V. Jhala, and R. C. Fleischer, “Ancient wolf lineages in India,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 271, no. 3, pp. 1–4, 2004.
[44]  R. M. Nowak, “Another look at wolf taxonomy,” in Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World, L. N. Carbyn, S. H. Fritts, and D. R. Seip, Eds., Canadian Circumpolar Institute, Edmonton, Canada, 1995.
[45]  I. Kornfield and P. F. Smith, “African cichlid fishes: model systems for evolutionary biology,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 31, pp. 163–196, 2000.
[46]  S. H. Berlocher and J. L. Feder, “Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy?” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 47, pp. 773–815, 2002.
[47]  D. I. Bolnick, “Waiting for sympatric speciation,” Evolution, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 895–899, 2004.
[48]  P. Bellwood, Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago, Australian National University Press, Canberra, Australia, 1985.
[49]  F. Frati, G. B. Hartl, S. Lovari, M. Delibes, and G. Markov, “Quaternary radiation and genetic structure of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in the Mediterranean Basin, as revealed by allozymes and mitochondrial DNA,” Journal of Zoology, vol. 245, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 1998.
[50]  I. Barnes, P. Matheus, B. Shapiro, D. Jensen, and A. Cooper, “Dynamics of pleistocene population extinctions in Beringian brown bears,” Science, vol. 295, no. 5563, pp. 2267–2270, 2002.
[51]  J. A. Leonard, R. K. Wayne, and A. Cooper, “Population genetics of Ice Age brown bears,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 1651–1654, 2000.
[52]  V. Lucchini, A. Galov, and E. Randi, “Evidence of genetic distinction and long-term population decline in wolves (Canis lupus) in the Italian Apennines,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 523–536, 2004.
[53]  C. Vilà, I. R. Amorim, J. A. Leonard et al., “Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography and population history of the grey wolf Canis lupus,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 2089–2103, 1999.
[54]  L. E. Carmichael, J. A. Nagy, N. C. Larter, and C. Strobeck, “Prey specialization may influence patterns of gene flow in wolves of the Canadian Northwest,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 2787–2798, 2001.
[55]  J. Cui and Z. Q. Wang, “Outbreaks of human trichinellosis caused by consumption of dog meat in China,” Parasite, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. S74–S77, 2001.
[56]  M. Titcomb, Dog and Man in the Ancient Pacific with Special Attention to Hawaii, Bishop Museum Special Publication no. 59, Star-Bulletin, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 1969.
[57]  L. K. Corbett, “Morphological comparisons of Australian and Thai dingoes: a reappraisal of dingo status, distributiona nd ancestry,” Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia, vol. 13, pp. 277–291, 1985.
[58]  M. Lantis, “Changes in the Alaskan Eskimo relation of man to dog and their effect on two human diseases,” Arctic Anthropology, vol. 17, pp. 2–24, 1980.
[59]  W. K. Powers and M. N. Powers, “Putting on the dog,” Natural History, vol. 95, pp. 6–16, 1986.
[60]  L. M. Snyder, “Barking mutton: ethnohistoric, ethnographic, archaeological, and nutritional evidence pertaining to dogs as a Native American food resource on the Plains,” in Beamers, Bobwhites, and Blue-Points, Tributes to the Career of Paul W. Parmalee, J. R. Purdue, W. E. Klippel, and B. W. Styles, Eds., vol. 23 of Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers, Illinois State Museum, Springfield, Ill, USA, 1991.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133