Background. Computed tomography of pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is a widely used investigation in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). It is not without adverse effects either through contrast injection or radiation exposure. International guidelines suggest that patients with a low/intermediate clinical probability and negative D-dimer do not require CTPA to exclude PE. Method. A retrospective audit of 100 consecutive CTPA scans was performed at a district general hospital from January to May 2012 to assess adherence to the current guidelines for diagnosis of acute PE and utilisation of CTPA. Result. Of the total 88 CTPA scans that were included in the study, 14% were positive for PE. At least 6%, potentially up to 30% of all the scans, could have been avoided by adherence to current guidelines, thereby improving the positive yield to as high as 19%. Clinical probability scores were documented in only 3%. Orthopaedics requested 3% of all scans and the Assessment Treatment and Rehabilitation (ATR) unit had the highest number of CTPA requests per 100 departmental inpatient admissions. Conclusion. Adherence to the current guidelines can reduce the number of CTPA scans required and may reduce cost, contrast exposure, and radiation burden. 1. Introduction Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) is the most commonly employed investigation in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Most evidence is derived from the large University Hospitals in North America. Most scans are performed in smaller centres around the world. CTPA scanning is convenient as it is accessible after hours and it can often offer alternative diagnoses; however, its disadvantages includes cost, contrast use, and radiation exposure [1, 2]. In a theoretical analysis, it was estimated that current typical testing practices for PE in the Emergency Department would prevent six deaths and 24 major nonfatal PE events, but also cause 36 deaths and 37 nonfatal major harms per 10,000 from contrast-induced renal failure, radiation-induced cancer, and major haemorrhage from anticoagulation [1]. Current guidelines based on studies in tertiary centres suggest using a clinical probability score (Wells criteria or Geneva score) and D-dimer testing prior to requesting CTPA. The pivotal aspects of these guidelines in CTPA-experienced institutions with quantitative D-dimer assay are [2, 3] as follows.(1)Low/intermediate clinical probability and negative D-dimer excludes PE without CTPA. (2)Low/intermediate clinical probability and positive D-dimer needs CTPA to
References
[1]
D. H. Newman and D. L. Schriger, “Rethinking testing for pulmonary embolism: less is more,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 622–627, 2011.
[2]
B. T. Thompson and C. A. Hales, “Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism,” UpToDate, 2012.
[3]
I. A. Campbell, A. Fennerty, A. C. Miller et al., “BTS guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism,” Thorax, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 470–483, 2003.
MAking the Best Use of a CTPA, Guidelines for Doctors, Department of Clinical Radiology, The Royal College of Radiologist, 6th edition, 2007.
[6]
J. A. Kline, D. M. Courtney, C. Kabrhel et al., “Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 772–780, 2008.
[7]
F. S. Drescher, S. Chandrika, I. D. Weir et al., “Effectiveness and acceptability of a computerized decision support system using modified wells criteria for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 613–621, 2011.
[8]
J. H. Donohoo, W. W. Mayo-Smith, J. A. Pezzullo, and T. K. Egglin, “Utilization patterns and diagnostic yield of 3421 consecutive multidetector row computed tomography pulmonary angiograms in a busy emergency department,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 421–425, 2008.
[9]
E. G. Stein, L. B. Haramati, M. Chamarthy, S. Sprayregen, M. M. Davitt, and L. M. Freeman, “Success of a safe and simple algorithm to reduce use of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 392–397, 2010.
[10]
P. Chin, M. Hurrell, D. McGregor, and L. Beckert, “The role of CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism admitted to general medicine,” New Zealand Medical Journal, vol. 119, no. 1237, 2006.
[11]
J. Tan, A. Pais, and T. Jain, “The appropriate use of computed tomography pulmonary angiogram in diagnosing pulmonary embolism,” OJCA Online, vol. 4, no. 1, 2012.
[12]
P. L. Harper, E. Theakston, J. Ahmed, and P. Ockelford, “D-dimer concentration increases with age reducing the clinical value of the D-dimer assay in the elderly,” Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 607–613, 2007.
[13]
M. Righini, G. Le Gal, A. Perrier, and H. Bounameaux, “The challenge of diagnosing pulmonary embolism in elderly patients: influence of age on commonly used diagnostic tests and strategies,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1039–1045, 2005.
[14]
R. A. Douma, G. le Gal, M. S?hne et al., “Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts,” BMJ, vol. 340, article c1475, 2010.
[15]
H. J. Schouten, H. L. Koek, R. Oudega et al., “Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis,” BMJ, vol. 344, article e2985, 2012.
[16]
S. Sweetland, J. Green, B. Liu et al., “Duration and magnitude of the postoperative risk of venous thromboembolism in middle aged women: prospective cohort study,” BMJ, vol. 339, article b4583, 2009.