The prospect of ethanol dry reforming process to utilize CO2 for conversion to hydrogen, syngas, and carbon nanofilaments using abundantly available biofuel—ethanol, and widely available environmental pollutant CO2 is very enthusiastic. A thermodynamic analysis of ethanol CO2 reforming process is done using Gibbs free energy minimization methodology within the temperature range 300–900°C, 1–10 bar pressure, and CO2 to carbon (in ethanol) ratio (CCER) 1–5. The effect of individual as well as combined effect of process parameters such as temperature, pressure, and CCER was determined on the product distribution. Optimum process conditions for maximising desired products and minimizing undesired products for applications such as gas to liquids (GTL) via fischer tropsch synthesis, syngas generation for Solid oxide fuel cells, and carbon nanofilament manufacture were found in this study. 1. Introduction CO2 reforming (also known as dry reforming) is a useful way to utilize CO2 to transform it into valuable species such as hydrogen, syngas, and carbon (nanofilaments). CO2 reforming is analogous to steam reforming which has been widely used to produce hydrogen for different applications. Although dry reforming (DR) is a known process in the chemical literature, catalyst deactivation due to carbon formation was its major drawback. However, with increase in CO2 pollution awareness, researchers have started fresh studies in dry reforming to utilize (and thus sequester) CO2. This move has come with a bonus: carbon nanofilament formation was reported in some experimental studies of dry reforming. Dry reforming of natural gas was a major research area. Many research studies on dry reforming of methane have been reported [1–6]. Dry reforming of butanol [7], glycerol [8], and coke oven gas [9] has also been studied by some researchers. The popularity of biofuels and use of biomass has brought an alternative to natural gas. Ethanol is cheaply available in many countries. It is easily manufactured by biomass fermentation can be stored and transported safely. Hence, ethanol is a potential fuel that can be easily used in dry reforming processes. Dry reforming of ethanol has been studied by some researchers: De Oliveira-Vigier et al. [10] have experimentally studied the dry reforming of ethanol using a recyclable and long-lasting SS 316 catalyst and have obtained a hydrogen yield that is 98% of the theoretical value. Blanchard et al. [11] have experimentally studied the ethanol dry reforming using a carbon steel catalyst to produce syngas and nanocarbons. Bellido et al.
References
[1]
M. K. Nikoo and N. A. S. Amin, “Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide reforming of methane in view of solid carbon formation,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 678–691, 2011.
[2]
S. Wang and G. Q. A. Lu, “A comprehensive study on carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Ni/γ-Al2O3 Catalysts,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 2615–2625, 1999.
[3]
S. Wang, G. Q. Lu, and G. J. Millar, “Carbon dioxide reforming of methane to produce synthesis gas over metal-supported satalysts: state of the art,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 896–904, 1996.
[4]
A. R. S. Darujati and W. J. Thomson, “Kinetic study of a ceria-promoted Mo2C/γ-Al2O3 catalyst in dry-methane reforming,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 61, no. 13, pp. 4309–4315, 2006.
[5]
M. M. Barroso-Quiroga and A. E. Castro-Luna, “Catalytic activity and effect of modifiers on Ni-based catalysts for the dry reforming of methane,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 6052–6056, 2010.
[6]
N. Wang, W. Chu, T. Zhang, and X. S. Zhao, “Synthesis, characterization and catalytic performances of Ce-SBA-15 supported nickel catalysts for methane dry reforming to hydrogen and syngas,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, pp. 19–30, 2012.
[7]
W. Wang, “Hydrogen production via dry reforming of butanol: thermodynamic analysis,” Fuel, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1681–1688, 2011.
[8]
X. Wang, M. Li, M. Wang et al., “Thermodynamic analysis of glycerol dry reforming for hydrogen and synthesis gas production,” Fuel, vol. 88, no. 11, pp. 2148–2153, 2009.
[9]
J. M. Bermúdez, B. Fidalgo, A. Arenillas, and J. A. Menéndez, “Dry reforming of coke oven gases over activated carbon to produce syngas for methanol synthesis,” Fuel, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 2897–2902, 2010.
[10]
K. De Oliveira-Vigier, N. Abatzoglou, and F. Gitzhofer, “Dry-reforming of ethanol in the presence of a 316 stainless steel catalyst,” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 978–984, 2005.
[11]
J. Blanchard, H. Oudghiri-Hassani, N. Abatzoglou, S. Jankhah, and F. Gitzhofer, “Synthesis of nanocarbons via ethanol dry reforming over a carbon steel catalyst,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 143, no. 1–3, pp. 186–194, 2008.
[12]
J. D. A. Bellido, E. Y. Tanabe, and E. M. Assaf, “Carbon dioxide reforming of ethanol over Ni/Y2O3-ZrO2 catalysts,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 90, no. 3-4, pp. 485–488, 2009.
[13]
A. Silva, C. Malfatti, and I. L. Müller, “Thermodynamic analysis of ethanol steam reforming using Gibbs energy minimization method: a detailed study of the conditions of carbon deposition,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 4321–4330, 2009.
[14]
K. Vasudeva, N. Mitra, P. Umasankar, and S. C. Dhingra, “Steam reforming of ethanol for hydrogen production: thermodynamic analysis,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 1996.
[15]
E. Y. García and M. A. Laborde, “Hydrogen production by the steam reforming of ethanol: thermodynamic analysis,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 307–312, 1991.
[16]
I. Fishtik, A. Alexander, R. Datta, and D. Geana, “Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming of ethanol via response reactions,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 31–45, 2000.
[17]
W. Wang and Y. Cao, “Hydrogen production via sorption enhanced steam reforming of butanol: thermodynamic analysis,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 2887–2895, 2011.
[18]
X. Wang, N. Wang, and L. Wang, “Hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of propane: a thermodynamic investigation,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 466–472, 2011.
[19]
G. Zeng, Y. Tian, and Y. Li, “Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production for fuel cell via oxidative steam reforming of propane,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 13, pp. 6726–6737, 2010.
[20]
X. Wang, N. Wang, M. Li, S. Li, S. Wang, and X. Ma, “Hydrogen production by glycerol steam reforming with in situ hydrogen separation: a thermodynamic investigation,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 19, pp. 10252–10256, 2010.
[21]
K. Faungnawakij, R. Kikuchi, and K. Eguchi, “Thermodynamic analysis of carbon formation boundary and reforming performance for steam reforming of dimethyl ether,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 2007.
[22]
G. R. Kale and B. D. Kulkarni, “Thermodynamic analysis of dry autothermal reforming of glycerol,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 520–530, 2010.
[23]
S. Jankhah, N. Abatzoglou, and F. Gitzhofer, “Thermal and catalytic dry reforming and cracking of ethanol for hydrogen and carbon nanofilaments' production,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 18, pp. 4769–4779, 2008.
[24]
W. Wang and Y. Wang, “Dry reforming of ethanol for hydrogen production: thermodynamic investigation,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 34, no. 13, pp. 5382–5389, 2009.
[25]
HSC Chemistry [Software], Version 5.1, Outokumpu Research Oy, Pori, Finland, 2002.