This paper attempts at developing simple, efficient, and fast converging load flow analysis techniques tailored to autonomous microgrids. Two modified backward forward sweep techniques have been developed in this work where the largest generator is chosen as slack generator, in the first method and all generator buses are modeled as slack buses in the second method. The second method incorporates the concept of distributed slack bus to update the real and reactive power generations in the microgrid. This paper has details on the development of these two methodologies and the efficacy of these methods is compared with the conventional Newton Raphson load flow method. The standard 33-bus distribution system has been transformed into an autonomous microgrid and used for evaluation of the proposed load flow methodologies. Matlab coding has been developed for validating the results. 1. Introduction Aggregation of generating units and loads, at medium and low voltage levels, forms small power islands called microgrids. Most researchers concentrate on the design and control aspects of these microgrids with respect to the resource availability and dispatchability of power to the loads. Design issues, generation planning, and economic dispatch in an autonomous microgrid need dedicated and robust power flow computations. Load flow analysis of an autonomous microgrid is necessary for ascertaining the adequacy of supply from DGs without compromising the voltage profile and to determine the state of the system. Different load flow techniques adopted in the literature are classified into three categories, namely, direct methods, Newton Raphson (NR) based methods, and backward forward sweep based methods. Direct methods involve impedance matrix where the numbering of nodes and lines decides the efficacy and convergence criteria. Chen et al. proposed a rigid power flow method based on series impedance model [1] and Carpaneto et al. suggested a loss allocation technique, based on decomposition of the branch currents [2]. Tedious computation is the basic drawback in these methods. NR method was used in certain methodologies to determine the bus voltages and power flows in distribution networks. A modified Newton method had been discussed by Zhang and Cheng [3] and as an extension Teng and Chang [4] suggested a novel fast three phase load flow analysis for unbalanced radial distribution systems. Bijwe and Kelapure [5] proposed a nondivergent load flow analysis based on NR method. NR-based method was extended to unbalanced systems by Zimmerman and Chiang [6] and further
References
[1]
T.-H. Chen, M.-S. Chen, K.-J. Hwang, P. Kotas, and E. A. Chebli, “Distribution system power flow analysis—a rigid approach,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1146–1152, 1991.
[2]
E. Carpaneto, G. Chicco, and J. S. Akilimali, “Branch current decomposition method for loss allocation in radial distribution systems with distributed generation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1170–1179, 2006.
[3]
F. Zhang and C. S. Cheng, “A modified Newton method for radial distribution system power flow analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 389–397, 1997.
[4]
J.-H. Teng and C.-Y. Chang, “A novel and fast three-phase load flow for unbalanced radial distribution systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1238–1244, 2002.
[5]
P. R. Bijwe and S. M. Kelapure, “Non-divergent fast power flow methods,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 633–638, 2003.
[6]
R. D. Zimmerman and H.-D. Chiang, “Fast decoupled power flow for unbalanced radial distribution systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2045–2052, 1995.
[7]
A. G. Exp?sito and E. R. Ramos, “Reliable load flow technique for radial distribution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1063–1069, 1999.
[8]
P. A. N. Garcia, J. L. R. Pereira, S. Carneiro, and V. M. da Costa, “Three-phase power flow calculations using the current injection method,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 508–514, 2000.
[9]
D. Shirmohammadi, H. W. Hong, A. Semlyen, and G. X. Luo, “A compensation-based power flow method for weakly meshed distribution and transmission networks,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 753–762, 1988.
[10]
R. G. Cespedes, “New method for the analysis of distribution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 391–396, 1990.
[11]
C. S. Cheng and D. Shirmohammadi, “A three-phase power flow method for real-time distribution system analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 671–679, 1995.
[12]
G. W. Chang, S. Y. Chu, and H. L. Wang, “An improved backward/forward sweep load flow algorithm for radial distribution systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 882–884, 2007.
[13]
B. Venkatesh and R. Ranjan, “Data structure for radial distribution system load flow analysis,” IEE Proceedings: Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 101–106, 2003.
[14]
A. Losi and M. Russo, “Object-oriented load flow for radial and weakly meshed distribution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1265–1274, 2003.
[15]
A. K. Basu, S. Chowdhury, and S. P. Chowdhury, “Impact of strategic deployment of CHP-based DERs on microgrid reliability,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1697–1705, 2010.
[16]
D. Kirschen, R. Allan, and G. Strbac, “Contributions of individual generators to loads and flows,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 52–60, 1997.
[17]
G. Strbac, D. Kirschen, and S. Ahmed, “Allocating transmission system usage on the basis of traceable contributions of generators and loads to flows,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 527–534, 1998.
[18]
P. Yan, “Modified distributed slack bus load flow algorithm for determining economic dispatch in deregulated power systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, pp. 1226–1231, Columbus, Ohio, USA, February 2001.
[19]
S. Tong and K. N. Miu, “A participation factor model for slack buses in distribution systems with DGs,” in Proceedings of the IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference, vol. 1, pp. 242–244, September 2003.
[20]
S. Tong, M. Kleinberg, and K. Miu, “A distributed slack bus model and its impact on distribution system application techniques,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS '05), vol. 5, pp. 4743–4746, May 2005.
[21]
S. Tong and K. N. Miu, “A network-based distributed slack bus model for DGs in unbalanced power flow studies,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 835–842, 2005.
[22]
V. Kumar, H. C. R. Kumar, I. Gupta, and H. O. Gupta, “DG Integrated approach for service restoration under cold load pickup,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 398–406, 2010.
[23]
A. Zobian and M. D. Ili?, “Unbundling of transmission and ancillary services—part I: technical issues,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 539–548, 1997.