全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Towards Understanding Extracellular ROS Sensory and Signaling Systems in Plants

DOI: 10.1155/2014/538946

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are ubiquitous metabolites in all aerobic organisms. Traditionally ROS have been considered as harmful, accidental byproducts of cellular functions involving electron transport chains or electron transfer. However, it is now recognized that controlled production of ROS has significant signaling functions, for example, in pathogen defense, in the regulation of stomatal closure, or in cell-to-cell signaling. ROS formation in subcellular compartments is critical to act as “alarm” signal in the response to stress, and the concept of ROS as primarily signaling substances has emerged. The involvement of ROS in several developmental and inducible processes implies that there must be coordinated function of signaling network(s) that govern ROS responses and subsequent processes. The air pollutant ozone can be used as a useful tool to elucidate the function of apoplastic ROS: O3 degrades in cell wall into various ROS which are interpreted as ROS with signaling function inducing downstream responses. We have used ozone as a tool in mutant screens and transcript profiling-reverse genetics to identify genes involved in processes related to the signaling function of ROS. We review here our recent findings in the elucidation of apoplastic ROS sensing, signaling, and interaction with various symplastic components. 1. Introduction Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are ubiquitous metabolites in all aerobic organisms. ROS include superoxide (? ), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (?OH), singlet oxygen (1O2), and the air pollutant ozone (O3). Traditionally ROS have been considered as harmful, accidental byproducts of cellular functions involving electron transport chains or electron transfer, where electrons are accidentally passed to molecular oxygen. Consequently, cells have effective enzymatic and chemical antioxidative defenses to remove these ROS [1, 2]. The most prominent sources of ROS in plant cells are thought to be chloroplasts and mitochondria, which both contain electron transfer chains involving multiple components. Processes that take place in peroxisomes and cytoplasm also produce ROS and the apoplast can be an important site for ROS generation, although the quantity of ROS produced is several-fold less than that of the organelles. However, it is now recognized that controlled production of ROS, for example, by the plasma membrane-localized NADPH oxidases, which produce in a controlled fashion ? to the apoplastic space, has significant signaling functions [3–5]. ROS formation in other subcellular compartments, for example,

References

[1]  R. Mittler, S. Vanderauwera, M. Gollery, and F. van Breusegem, “Reactive oxygen gene network of plants,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 490–498, 2004.
[2]  C. H. Foyer and G. Noctor, “Redox regulation in photosynthetic organisms: signaling, acclimation, and practical implications,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 861–905, 2009.
[3]  N. Suzuki, S. Koussevitzky, R. Mittler, and G. Miller, “ROS and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 259–270, 2012.
[4]  R. Mittler, S. Vanderauwera, N. Suzuki et al., “ROS signaling: the new wave?” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 300–309, 2011.
[5]  M. Sierla, M. Rahikainen, J. Saloj?rvi, J. Kangasj?rvi, and S. Kangasj?rvi, “Apoplastic and chloroplastic redox signaling networks in plant stress responses,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 2220–2239, 2013.
[6]  J. Kangasjarvi, J. Talvinen, M. Utriainen, and R. Karjalainen, “Plant defence systems induced by ozone,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 783–794, 1994.
[7]  G. Miller, V. Shulaev, and R. Mittler, “Reactive oxygen signaling and abiotic stress,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 481–489, 2008.
[8]  L. Vaahtera, M. Brosché, M. Wrzaczek, and J. Kangasj?rvi, “Specificity in ROS signaling and transcript signatures,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2014.
[9]  A. Shapiguzov, J. P. Vainonen, M. Wrzaczek, and J. Kangasj?rvi, “ROS-talk—how the apoplast, the chloroplast, and the nucleus get the message through,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 3, article 292, 2012.
[10]  S. Karpiński, M. Szechyńska-Hebda, W. Wituszyńska, and P. Burdiak, “Light acclimation, retrograde signalling, cell death and immune defences in plants,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 736–744, 2013.
[11]  M. J. Considine and C. Foyer, “Redox regulation of plant development,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2014.
[12]  J. Dowdle, T. Ishikawa, S. Gatzek, S. Rolinski, and N. Smirnoff, “Two genes in Arabidopsis thaliana encoding GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase are required for ascorbate biosynthesis and seedling viability,” Plant Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 673–689, 2007.
[13]  S. Kangasj?rvi, A. Lepist?, K. H?nnik?inen et al., “Diverse roles for chloroplast stromal and thylakoid-bound ascorbate peroxidases in plant stress responses,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 412, no. 2, pp. 275–285, 2008.
[14]  H. Fahnenstich, T. E. Scarpeci, E. M. Valle, U.-I. Flügge, and V. G. Maurino, “Generation of hydrogen peroxide in chloroplasts of arabidopsis overexpressing glycolate oxidase as an inducible system to study oxidative stress,” Plant Physiology, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 719–729, 2008.
[15]  A. Mhamdi, G. Queval, S. Chaouch, S. Vanderauwera, F. van Breusegem, and G. Noctor, “Catalase function in plants: a focus on Arabidopsis mutants as stress-mimic models,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 61, no. 15, pp. 4197–4220, 2010.
[16]  J. Kangasj?rvi, P. Jaspers, and H. Kollist, “Signalling and cell death in ozone-exposed plants,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1021–1036, 2005.
[17]  J. P. Vainonen and J. Kangasj?rvi, “Plant signaling in acute ozone exposure,” Plant Cell and Environment, 2014.
[18]  S. V. Krupa, “Joint effects of elevated levels of ultraviolet-B radiation, carbon dioxide and ozone on plants,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 535–542, 2003.
[19]  E. A. Ainsworth, C. R. Yendrek, S. Sitch, W. J. Collins, and L. D. Emberson, “The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, vol. 63, pp. 637–661, 2012.
[20]  M. V. Rao, J. R. Koch, and K. R. Davis, “Ozone: a tool for probing programmed cell death in plants,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 345–358, 2000.
[21]  S. Pasqualini, C. Piccioni, L. Reale, L. Ederli, G. D. Della Torre, and F. Ferranti, “Ozone-induced cell death in tobacco cultivar Bel W3 plants. The role of programmed cell death in lesion formation,” Plant Physiology, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 1122–1134, 2003.
[22]  K. Overmyer, M. Brosché, and J. Kangasj?rvi, “Reactive oxygen species and hormonal control of cell death,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 335–342, 2003.
[23]  R. Ahlfors, S. L?ng, K. Overmyer et al., “Arabidopsis RADICAL-INDUCED CELL DEATH1 belongs to the WWE protein-protein interaction domain protein family and modulates abscisic acid, ethylene, and methyl jasmonate responses,” The Plant Cell, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1925–1937, 2004.
[24]  T. Vahisalu, H. Kollist, Y.-F. Wang et al., “SLAC1 is required for plant guard cell S-type anion channel function in stomatal signalling,” Nature, vol. 452, no. 7186, pp. 487–491, 2008.
[25]  K. Overmyer, H. Kollist, H. Tuominen et al., “Complex phenotypic profiles leading to ozone sensitivity in Arabidopsis thaliana mutants,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1237–1249, 2008.
[26]  M. Wrzaczek, M. Brosché, H. Kollist, and J. Kangasj?rvi, “Arabidopsis GRI is involved in the regulation of cell death induced by extracellular ROS,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 13, pp. 5412–5417, 2009.
[27]  P. L. Conklin, S. A. Saracco, S. R. Norris, and R. L. Last, “Identification of ascorbic acid-deficient Arabidopsis thaliana mutants,” Genetics, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 847–856, 2000.
[28]  P. L. Conklin, E. H. Williams, and R. L. Last, “Environmental stress sensitivity of an ascorbic acid-deficient arabidopsis mutant,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 18, pp. 9970–9974, 1996.
[29]  J. Negi, O. Matsuda, T. Nagasawa et al., “CO2 regulator SLAC1 and its homologues are essential for anion homeostasis in plant cells,” Nature, vol. 452, no. 7186, pp. 483–486, 2008.
[30]  S. Saji, S. Bathula, A. Kubo et al., “Disruption of a gene encoding C4-dicarboxylate transporter-like protein increases ozone sensitivity through deregulation of the stomatal response in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 2008.
[31]  M. Brosché, E. Merilo, F. Mayer et al., “Natural variation in ozone sensitivity among Arabidopsis thaliana accessions and its relation to stomatal conductance,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 914–925, 2010.
[32]  G. L. Wheeler and C. Brownlee, “Ca2+ signalling in plants and green algae—changing channels,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 506–514, 2008.
[33]  M. Wrzaczek, J. P. Vainonen, H. Help, et al., “Arabidopsis GRIM REAPER functions through metacaspase processing and receptor-ligand interaction,” submitted. In press.
[34]  J. P. Vainonen, P. Jaspers, M. Wrzaczek et al., “RCD1-DREB2A interaction in leaf senescence and stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 442, no. 3, pp. 573–581, 2012.
[35]  P. Jaspers, K. Overmyer, M. Wrzaczek et al., “The RST and PARP-like domain containing SRO protein family: analysis of protein structure, function and conservation in land plants,” BMC Genomics, vol. 11, article 170, 2010.
[36]  G. Miller, K. Schlauch, R. Tam et al., “The plant NADPH oxidase RBOHD mediates rapid systemic signaling in response to diverse stimuli,” Science Signaling, vol. 2, no. 84, Article ID ra45, 2009.
[37]  M. Wrzaczek, M. Brosché, J. Saloj?rvi et al., “Transcriptional regulation of the CRK/DUF26 group of receptor-like protein kinases by ozone and plant hormones in Arabidopsis,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 10, article 95, 2010.
[38]  N. Id?nheimo, A. Gauthier, J. Saloj?rvi et al., “The Arabidopsis thaliana cysteine-rich receptor-like Kinases CRK6 and CRK7 protect against apoplastic oxidative stress,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 445, pp. 457–462, 2014.
[39]  C. Garcia-Mata, J. Wang, P. Gajdanowicz et al., “A minimal cysteine motif required to activate the SKOR K+ channel of arabidopsis by the reactive oxygen species H2O2,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 38, pp. 29286–29294, 2010.
[40]  H. Clayton, M. R. Knight, H. Knight, M. R. McAinsh, and A. M. Hetherington, “Dissection of the ozone-induced calcium signature,” Plant Journal, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 575–579, 1999.
[41]  N. H. Evans, M. R. McAinsh, A. M. Hetherington, and M. R. Knight, “ROS perception in Arabidopsis thaliana: the ozone-induced calcium response,” Plant Journal, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 615–626, 2005.
[42]  T. Vahisalu, I. Puz?rjova, M. Brosché et al., “Ozone-triggered rapid stomatal response involves the production of reactive oxygen species, and is controlled by SLAC1 and OST1,” Plant Journal, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 442–453, 2010.
[43]  M. Melotto, W. Underwood, J. Koczan, K. Nomura, and S. Y. He, “Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 969–980, 2006.
[44]  S.-H. Shiu and A. B. Bleecker, “Expansion of the receptor-like kinase/Pelle gene family and receptor-like proteins in Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 530–543, 2003.
[45]  S.-H. Shiu, W. M. Karlowski, R. Pan, Y.-H. Tzeng, K. F. X. Mayer, and W.-H. Li, “Comparative analysis of the receptor-like kinase family in Arabidopsis and rice,” The Plant Cell, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1220–1234, 2004.
[46]  M. D. Lehti-Shiu, C. Zou, K. Hanada, and S.-H. Shiu, “Evolutionary history and stress regulation of plant receptor-like kinase/pelle genes,” Plant Physiology, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 12–26, 2009.
[47]  M. Wrzaczek, M. Brosché, and J. Kangasj?rvi, “ROS signaling loops—production, perception, regulation,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 575–582, 2013.
[48]  P. Czernic, B. Visser, W. Sun et al., “Characterization of an versus Arabidopsis thaliana receptor-like protein kinase gene activated by oxidative stress and pathogen attack,” Plant Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 321–327, 1999.
[49]  K. Chen, B. Fan, L. Du, and Z. Chen, “Activation of hypersensitive cell death by pathogen-induced receptor-like protein kinases from Arabidopsis,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 271–283, 2004.
[50]  S. Munné-Bosch, G. Queval, and C. H. Foyer, “The impact of global change factors on redox signaling underpinning stress tolerance,” Plant Physiology, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 2013.
[51]  K. Overmyer, H. Tuominen, R. Kettunen et al., “Ozone-sensitive Arabidopsis rcd1 mutant reveals opposite roles for ethylene and jasmonate signaling pathways in regulating superoxide-dependent cell death,” The Plant Cell, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1849–1862, 2000.
[52]  P. Jaspers, T. Blomster, M. Brosché et al., “Unequally redundant RCD1 and SRO1 mediate stress and developmental responses and interact with transcription factors,” Plant Journal, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 268–279, 2009.
[53]  M. Brosché, T. Blomster, J. Saloj?rvi, et al., “Transcriptomics and functional genomics of ROS-induced cell death regulation by RADICAL-INDUCED CELL DEATH1,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 10, Article ID e1004112, 2014.
[54]  O. Borsani, J. Zhu, P. E. Verslues, R. Sunkar, and J.-K. Zhu, “Endogenous siRNAs derived from a pair of natural cis-antisense transcripts regulate salt tolerance in Arabidopsis,” Cell, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 1279–1291, 2005.
[55]  S. Katiyar-Agrwal, J. Zhu, K. Kim, et al., “A pathogen-inducible endogenous siRNA in plant immunity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 103, no. 49, pp. 18816–18821, 2006.
[56]  S. Liu, S. Liu, M. Wang et al., “A Wheat SIMILAR TO RCD-ONE gene enhances seedling growth and abiotic stress resistance by modulating redox homeostasis and maintaining genomic integrity,” The Plant Cell, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 164–180, 2014.
[57]  Y. Zhu, B. Du, J. Qian, B. Zou, and J. Hua, “Disease resistance gene-induced growth inhibition is enhanced by rcd1 independent of defense activation in Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 161, no. 4, pp. 2005–2013, 2013.
[58]  E. Pesquet, B. Zhang, A. Gorzsás et al., “Non-cell-autonomous postmortem lignification of tracheary elements in Zinnia elegans,” The Plant Cell, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1314–1328, 2013.
[59]  S. Teotia and R. S. Lamb, “The paralogous genes RADICAL-INDUCED CELL DEATH1 and SIMILAR TO RCD ONE1 have partially redundant functions during arabidopsis development,” Plant Physiology, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 180–198, 2009.
[60]  Z. Wang, G. A. Michaud, Z. Cheng et al., “Recognition of the iso-ADP-ribose moiety in poly(ADP-ribose) by WWE domains suggests a general mechanism for poly (ADP-ribosyl)ation-dependent ubiquitination,” Genes & Development, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 235–240, 2012.
[61]  Y. Sakuma, K. Maruyama, Y. Osakabe et al., “Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis transcription factor, DREB2A, involved in drought-responsive gene expression,” The Plant Cell, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1292–1309, 2006.
[62]  K. J. Wright and R. Tjian, “Wnt signaling targets ETO coactivation domain of TAF4/TFIID in vivo,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 55–60, 2009.
[63]  H. Nomura, T. Komori, S. Uemura et al., “Chloroplast-mediated activation of plant immune signalling in Arabidopsis,” Nature Communications, vol. 3, article 926, 2012.
[64]  S. Han, R. Tang, L. K. Anderson, T. E. Woerner, and Z.-M. Pei, “A cell surface receptor mediates extracellular Ca2+ sensing in guard cells,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6954, pp. 196–200, 2003.
[65]  R.-H. Tang, S. Han, H. Zheng et al., “Coupling diurnal cytosolic Ca2+ oscillations to the CAS-IP 3 pathway in Arabidopsis,” Science, vol. 315, no. 5817, pp. 1423–1426, 2007.
[66]  J. P. Vainonen, Y. Sakuragi, S. Stael et al., “Light regulation of CaS, a novel phosphoprotein in the thylakoid membrane of Arabidopsis thaliana,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 275, no. 8, pp. 1767–1777, 2008.
[67]  S. Weinl, K. Held, K. Schlücking et al., “A plastid protein crucial for Ca2+-regulated stomatal responses,” New Phytologist, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 675–686, 2008.
[68]  C. Kim, R. Meskauskiene, K. Apel, and C. Laloi, “No single way to understand singlet oxygen signalling in plants,” The EMBO Reports, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 435–439, 2008.
[69]  V. G?hre, A. M. E. Jones, J. Sklená?, S. Robatzek, and A. P. M. Weber, “Molecular crosstalk between PAMP-triggered immunity and photosynthesis,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1083–1092, 2012.
[70]  M. Tikkanen, N. R. Mekala, and E. M. Aro, “Photosystem II photoinhibition-repair cycle protects Photosystem I from irreversible damage,” Biochimia et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1837, no. 1, pp. 210–215, 2014.
[71]  C. Barth and P. L. Conklin, “The lower cell density of leaf parenchyma in the Arabidopsis thaliana mutant lcd1-1 is associated with increased sensitivity to ozone and virulent Pseudomonas syringae,” The Plant Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 206–218, 2003.
[72]  R. González-Bayón, E. A. Kinsman, V. Quesada et al., “Mutations in the RETICULATA gene dramatically alter internal architecture but have little effect on overall organ shape in Arabidopsis leaves,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 3019–3031, 2006.
[73]  J. M. Pérez-Pérez, D. Esteve-Bruna, R. González-Bayón et al., “Functional redundancy and divergence within the Arabidopsis RETICULATA-RELATED gene family,” Plant Physiology, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 589–603, 2013.
[74]  S. Karpinski, H. Reynolds, B. Karpinska, G. Wingsle, G. Creissen, and P. Mullineaux, “Systemic signaling and acclimation in response to excess excitation energy in Arabidopsis,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5414, pp. 654–657, 1999.
[75]  M. Suorsa, S. J?rvi, M. Grieco et al., “PROTON GRADIENT REGULATION5 is essential for proper acclimation of Arabidopsis photosystem I to naturally and artificially fluctuating light conditions,” The Plant Cell, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 2934–2948, 2012.
[76]  T. Blomster, J. Saloj?rvi, N. Sipari et al., “Apoplastic reactive oxygen species transiently decrease auxin signaling and cause stress-induced morphogenic response in Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 1866–1883, 2011.
[77]  S. Kangasj?rvi, J. Neukermans, S. Li, E.-M. Aro, and G. Noctor, “Photosynthesis, photorespiration, and light signalling in defence responses,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1619–1636, 2012.
[78]  S. Li, A. Mhamdi, A. Trotta, et al., “The protein phosphatase subunit PP2A-B′γ is required to suppress day length-dependent pathogenesis responses triggered by intracellular oxidative stress,” New Phytologist, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 145–160, 2014.
[79]  G. Queval, E. Issakidis-Bourguet, F. A. Hoeberichts et al., “Conditional oxidative stress responses in the Arabidopsis photorespiratory mutant cat2 demonstrate that redox state is a key modulator of daylength-dependent gene expression, and define photoperiod as a crucial factor in the regulation of H2O2-induced cell death,” Plant Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 640–657, 2007.
[80]  S. Chaouch, G. Queval, S. Vanderauwera et al., “Peroxisomal hydrogen peroxide is coupled to biotic defense responses by ISOCHORISMATE SYNTHASE1 in a daylength-related manner,” Plant Physiology, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 1692–1705, 2010.
[81]  A. Trotta, M. Wrzaczek, J. Scharte et al., “Regulatory subunit B′γ of protein phosphatase 2A prevents unnecessary defense reactions under low light in arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 1464–1480, 2011.
[82]  M. Coca and B. San Segundo, “AtCPK1 calcium-dependent protein kinase mediates pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis,” Plant Journal, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 526–540, 2010.
[83]  P. Schulz, M. Herde, and T. Romeis, “Calcium-dependent protein kinases: hubs in plant stress signaling and development,” Plant Physiology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 523–530, 2013.
[84]  D. Geiger, S. Scherzer, P. Mumm et al., “Activity of guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is controlled by drought-stress signaling kinase-phosphatase pair,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 50, pp. 21425–21430, 2009.
[85]  S. C. Lee, W. Lan, B. B. Buchanan, and S. Luan, “A protein kinase-phosphatase pair interacts with an ion channel to regulate ABA signaling in plant guard cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 50, pp. 21419–21424, 2009.
[86]  D. Geiger, S. Scherzer, P. Mumm et al., “Guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is regulated by CDPK protein kinases with distinct Ca2+ affinities,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 17, pp. 8023–8028, 2010.
[87]  B. Brandt, D. E. Brodsky, S. Xue et al., “Reconstitution of abscisic acid activation of SLAC1 anion channel by CPK6 and OST1 kinases and branched ABI1 PP2C phosphatase action,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 26, pp. 10593–10598, 2012.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133