全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Repeat Whole Brain Radiation Therapy with a Simultaneous Infield Boost: A Novel Technique for Reirradiation

DOI: 10.1155/2014/403945

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The treatment of patients who experience intracranial progression after whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is a clinical challenge. Novel radiation therapy delivery technologies are being applied with the objective of improving tumor and symptom control in these patients. The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical outcomes of the application of a novel technology to deliver repeat WBRT with volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and a simultaneous infield boost (WB-SIB) to gross disease. A total of 16 patients were initially treated with WBRT between 2000 and 2008 and then experienced intracranial progression, were treated using repeat WB-SIB, and were analyzed. The median dose for the first course of WBRT was 35?Gy (range: 30–50.4?Gy). Median time between the initial course of WBRT and repeat WB-SIB was 11.3 months. The median dose at reirradiation was 20?Gy to the whole brain with a median boost dose of 30?Gy to gross disease. A total of 2 patients demonstrated radiographic disease progression after treatment. The median overall survival (OS) time from initial diagnosis of brain metastases was 18.9 months (range: 7.1–66.6 (95% CI: 0.8–36.9)). The median OS time after initiation of reirradiation for all patients was 2.7 months (range: 0.46–14.46 (95% CI: 1.3–8.7)). Only 3 patients experienced CTCAE grade 3 fatigue. No other patients experienced any ≥ CTCAE grade 3 toxicity. This analysis reports the result of a novel RT delivery technique for the treatment of patients with recurrent brain metastases. Side effects were manageable and comparable to other conventional repeat WBRT series. Repeat WB-SIB using the VMAT RT delivery technology is feasible and appears to have acceptable short-term acute toxicity. These results may provide a foundation for further exploration of the WB-SIB technique for repeat WBRT in future prospective clinical trials. 1. Introduction Metastases to the brain occur in 25–45% of cancer patients [1]. With improving systemic treatments, cancer death rates are decreasing and patients with metastatic disease are living longer [2]. Standard treatment for patients with unresectable brain metastasis includes whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or a combination of both [3, 4]. Local and distant brain progression after conventional WBRT are common, occurring in 47–86% of patients [5]. Potential interventions after WBRT include surgical resection, chemotherapy, SRS, or repeat WBRT. The radiation dose given at the time of repeat WBRT generally is reduced secondary to toxicity concerns and ranges

References

[1]  E. S. Nussbaum, H. R. Djalilian, K. H. Cho, and W. A. Hall, “Brain metastases. Histology, multiplicity, surgery, and survival,” Cancer, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 1781–1788, 1996.
[2]  A. Jemal, R. Siegel, J. Xu, and E. Ward, “Cancer statistics, 2010,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 277–300, 2010.
[3]  D. W. Andrews, C. B. Scott, P. W. Sperduto et al., “Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial,” The Lancet, vol. 363, no. 9422, pp. 1665–1672, 2004.
[4]  H. Aoyama, H. Shirato, M. Tago et al., “Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 295, no. 21, pp. 2483–2491, 2006.
[5]  B. Borgelt, R. Gelber, and S. Kramer, “The palliation of brain metastases: final results of the first two studies by the radiation therapy oncology group,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1980.
[6]  W. M. Shehata, F. R. Hendrickson, and W. A. Hindo, “Rapid fractionation technique and retreatment of cerebral metastases by irradiation,” Cancer, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 257–261, 1974.
[7]  P. Kurup, S. Reddy, and F. R. Hendrickson, “Results of re-irradiation for cerebral metastases,” Cancer, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 2587–2589, 1980.
[8]  M. B. Hazuka and J. J. Kinzie, “Brain metastases: results and effects of re-irradiation,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 433–437, 1988.
[9]  J. S. Cooper, A. D. Steinfeld, and I. A. Lerch, “Cerebral metastases: value of reirradiation in selected patients,” Radiology, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 883–885, 1990.
[10]  W. W. Wong, S. E. Schild, T. E. Sawyer, and E. G. Shaw, “Analysis of outcome in patients reirradiated for brain metastases,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 585–590, 1996.
[11]  E. Sadikov, A. Bezjak, Q.-L. Yi et al., “Value of whole brain re-irradiation for brain metastases—single centre experience,” Clinical Oncology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 532–538, 2007.
[12]  M. M. R. Abdel-Wahab, A. H. Wolfson, W. Raub et al., “The role of hyperfractionated re-irradiation in metastatic brain disease: a single institutional trial,” American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 158–160, 1997.
[13]  C. H. Son, R. Jimenez, A. Niemierko, J. S. Loeffler, K. S. Oh, and H. A. Shih, “Outcomes after whole brain reirradiation in patients with brain metastases,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 82, 2, pp. e167–e172, 2011.
[14]  F. J. Lagerwaard, E. A. P. van der Hoorn, W. F. A. R. Verbakel, C. J. A. Haasbeek, B. J. Slotman, and S. Senan, “Whole-brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost to multiple brain metastases using volumetric modulated arc therapy,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 253–259, 2009.
[15]  L. Gaspar, C. Scott, M. Rotman et al., “Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 745–751, 1997.
[16]  P. W. Sperduto, B. Berkey, L. E. Gaspar, M. Mehta, and W. Curran, “A new prognostic index and comparison to three other indices for patients with brain metastases: an analysis of 1,960 patients in the RTOG database,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 510–514, 2008.
[17]  D. Kondziolka, A. Patel, L. D. Lunsford, A. Kassam, and J. C. Flickinger, “Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with multiple brain metastases,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 427–434, 1999.
[18]  P. W. Sperduto, S. T. Chao, P. K. Sneed et al., “Diagnosis-specific prognostic factors, indexes, and treatment outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis of 4,259 patients,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 655–661, 2010.
[19]  S. M. Sawrie, B. L. Guthrie, S. A. Spencer et al., “Predictors of distant brain recurrence for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery alone,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 181–186, 2008.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133