Background. Uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare diagnosis, which is seldom cured when it recurs with metastatic disease. We evaluated patients who present with first time recurrence treated surgically to determine prognostic factors associated with long-term survival. Methods. Over a 16-year period, 41 patients were operated on for recurrent uterine sarcoma. Data examined included patient age, date of initial diagnosis, tumor histology, grade at the initial diagnosis, cytopathology changes in tumor activity from the initial diagnosis, residual tumor after all operations, use of adjuvant therapy, dates and sites of all recurrences, and disease status at last followup. Results. 24 patients were operated for first recurrence of metastatic uterine LMS. Complete tumor resection with histologic negative margins was achieved in 16 (67%) patients. Overall survival was significantly affected by the FIGO stage at the time of the initial diagnosis, the ability to obtain complete tumor resection at the time of surgery for first time recurrent disease, single tumor recurrence, and recurrence greater than 12 months from the time of the initial diagnosis. Median disease-free survival was 14 months and overall survival was 27 months. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that stage 1 at the time of initial diagnosis, recurrence greater than 12 months, isolated tumor recurrence, and the ability to remove ability to perform complete tumor resection at the time of the first recurrence can afford improved survival in selected patientsat the time of the first recurrence can afford improved survival in selected patients. 1. Introduction Uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare diagnosis and the majority of cases are diagnosed after surgery for uterine fibroid disease. These patients are often observed for long periods of time, and not infrequently percutaneous embolization is utilized in an effort to avoid surgery for large symptomatic fibroid disease. Hysterectomy is usually performed only when the fibroids become excessively symptomatic with pain or bleeding [1]. More recently the potential negative effects of uterine morcellation with fibroid surgery have been described in consideration of this rare entity [2]. The incidence of uterine LMS is unusual and represents about 1% of all uterine malignancies [3, 4], and the vast majority of cases are generally confined to the uterus and cervix at the time of diagnosis [5–7]. Uterine LMS must be distinguished from other mesenchymal tumors, such as endometrial stromal sarcoma, adenosarcoma, carcinosarcoma, epithelial tumors, and
References
[1]
S. Leibsohn, G. D'Ablaing, D. R. Mishell Jr., and J. B. Schlaerth, “Leiomyosarcoma in a series of hysterectomies performed for presumed uterine leiomyomas,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 968–976, 1990.
[2]
K. Kho and C. Nezhat, “Evaluating the risks of electric uterine morecellation,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 311, pp. 905–906, 2014.
[3]
B. L. Harlow, N. S. Weiss, and S. Lofton, “The epidemiology of sarcomas of the uterus,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 399–402, 1986.
[4]
A. Gadducci, F. Landoni, E. Sartori et al., “Uterine leiomyosarcoma: analysis of treatment failures and survival,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 1996.
[5]
O. M. Salazar, T. A. Bonfiglio, S. F. Patten et al., “Uterine sarcomas: natural history, treatment and prognosis,” Cancer, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1152–1160, 1978.
[6]
R. L. Giuntoli II, D. S. Metzinger, C. S. DiMarco et al., “Retrospective review of 208 patients with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: prognostic indicators, surgical management, and adjuvant therapy,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 460–469, 2003.
[7]
D. S. Kapp, J. Y. Shin, and J. K. Chan, “Prognostic factors and survival in 1396 patients with uterine leiomyosarcomas: emphasis on impact of lymphadenectomy and oophorectomy,” Cancer, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 820–830, 2008.
[8]
C. G. Tropé, V. M. Abeler, and G. B. Kristensen, “Diagnosis and treatment of sarcoma of the uterus. A review,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 694–705, 2012.
[9]
J.-H. Nam, “Surgical treatment of uterine sarcoma,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 751–760, 2011.
[10]
K. S. Olah, J. A. Dunn, and H. Gee, “Leiomyosarcomas have a poorer prognosis than mixed mesodermal tumours when adjusting for known prognostic factors: the result of a retrospective study of 423 cases of uterine sarcoma,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 590–594, 1992.
[11]
J. Prat, “FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 177–178, 2009.
[12]
B. M. Seddon and R. Davda, “Uterine sarcomas—recent progress and future challenges,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 30–40, 2011.
[13]
V. Loizzi, G. Cormio, D. Nestola et al., “Prognostic factors and outcomes in 28 cases of uterine leiomyosarcoma,” Oncology, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 91–97, 2011.
[14]
K. Lusby, K. B. Savannah, E. G. Demicco et al., “Uterine leiomyosarcoma management, outcome, and associated molecular biomarkers: a single institution's experience,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2364–2372, 2013.
[15]
D. Lim, W. L. Wang, C. H. Lee, T. Dodge, B. Gilks, and E. Oliva, “Old versus new FIGO staging systems in predicting overall survival in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a study of 86 cases,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 322–326, 2013.
[16]
A. Gadducci, “Prognostic factors in uterine sarcoma,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 783–795, 2011.
[17]
N. S. Reed, C. Mangioni, H. Malmstr?m et al., “Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study (protocol 55874),” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 808–818, 2008.
[18]
G. Sutton, J. Blessing, P. Hanjani, and P. Kramer, “Phase II evaluation of liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in recurrent or advanced leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 749–752, 2005.
[19]
H. B. Muss, B. Bundy, P. J. DiSaia, et al., “Treatment of recurrent or advanced uterine sarcoma. A randomized trial of doxorubicin versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (a phase III trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group),” Cancer, vol. 55, pp. 1648–1653, 1985.
[20]
M. L. Hensley, J. A. Blessing, K. Degeest, O. Abulafia, P. G. Rose, and H. D. Homesley, “Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as second-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II study,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 323–328, 2008.
[21]
B. A. Goff, L. W. Rice, D. Fleischhacker et al., “Uterine leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma: lymph node metastases and sites of recurrence,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 105–109, 1993.
[22]
M. M. Leitao, M. F. Brennan, M. Hensley et al., “Surgical resection of pulmonary and extrapulmonary recurrences of uterine leiomyosarcoma,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 287–294, 2002.
[23]
R. L. Giuntoli II, E. Garrett-Mayer, R. E. Bristow, and B. S. Gostout, “Secondary cytoreduction in the management of recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 82–88, 2007.
[24]
N. Mantel, “Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration,” Cancer Chemotherapy Reports, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 163–170, 1966.
[25]
A. Caceres, S. M. Mourton, B. H. Bochner et al., “Extended pelvic resections for recurrent uterine and cervical cancer: out-of-the-box surgery,” International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1139–1144, 2008.
[26]
R. Bernstein-Molho, D. Grisaro, V. Soyfer, T. Safra, and O. Merimsky, “Metastatic uterine leiomyosarcomas: a single-institution experience,” International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 255–260, 2010.