Learning capability is the basis of evolution in every organization. Since the simplification and development of learning level in any organization seems to be necessary, in this paper we represent a mathematical model to maximize organizational learning capability. The proposed mathematical model focuses on required cost, labor, and capital, for implementation of ten effective factors on learning capability in different parts of an organization so that they are effective in learning capability with least cost for organization. To measure the factors in different parts of an organization some metrics are introduced. Computational tests confirm the effectiveness of the model. The model is optimized by epsilon constraint while it is multiobjective one. The validation of the model is also reported to emphasize the validity and applicability of the proposed methodology. 1. Introduction Since learning is the survival factor of any organization, in this study, we focus on increasing organizational learning capability. An organization requires several capabilities for learning to enable knowledge transfer in the organization. In this environment to integrate the knowledge with the existing knowledge and for creating new knowledge measuring is essential. This capability is called organizational learning capability [1]. Organizational learning capability (OLC) includes many dimensions. Here we will involve ten dimensions of OLC dimensions for better explanation of our aim. We can choose each set of OLC dimensions, in order to obtain maximum level of learning capability and facilitating knowledge sharing process in different segments of an organization, all previous studies in this context measured the learning capability by a limited number of dimensions, and no pattern of decision was presented in this context to increase the organizational learning capability. Also, previous studies did not consider the economic aspects for OLC dimensions. We presented a mathematical model for increasing OLC and determined costs, labor, and capital that each dimension needs to implement. In order to obtain maximum level of learning capability in an organization we should implement each dimension of OLC in a part that has the greatest effect on OLC compared with other parts. 2. Organizational Learning Capability OLC is defined as the organizational and managerial characteristics or factors that facilitate the organizational learning process or allow an organization to learn [1, 2]. Templeton believes that organizational learning is a collection of organizational functions such
References
[1]
S. Goh and G. Richards, “Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations,” European Management Journal, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 575–583, 1997.
[2]
G. Tomas, M. Hult, and O. C. Ferrell, “Global organizational learning capacity in purchasing: construct and measurement,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 97–111, 1997.
[3]
G. F. Templeton, B. R. Lewis, and C. A. Snyder, “Development of a measure for the organizational learning construct,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 175–218, 2002.
[4]
M. M. Rashidi, M. Habibi, and J. Jafari Farsani, “The relationship between intellectual assets organizational learning capability at the institute for international energy studies,” Manegement and Human Resources in the Oil Industry, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 59–76, 2010.
[5]
D. Ulrich, T. Jick, and M. A. V. Glinow, “High-impact learning: building and diffusing learning capability,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 52–66, 1993.
[6]
J. Alegre and R. Chiva, “Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test,” Technovation, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 315–326, 2008.
[7]
P. J. Gómez, J. J. C. Lorente, and R. V. Cabrera, “Training practices and organisational learning capability: relationship and implications,” Journal of European Industrial Training, vol. 28, no. 2–4, pp. 234–256, 2004.
[8]
J. Bhatnagar, “Measuring organizational learning capability in Indian managers and establishing firm performance linkage: an empirical analysis,” Learning Organization, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 416–433, 2006.
[9]
M. Pedler, J. Burgoyne, and T. Boydell, The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, UK, 1997.
[10]
R. Chiva-Gomez, “Repercussions of complex adaptive systems on product design management,” Technovation, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 707–711, 2004.
[11]
R. Chiva, J. Alegre, and R. Lapiedra, “Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce,” International Journal of Manpower, vol. 28, no. 3-4, pp. 224–242, 2007.
[12]
P. Jerez-Gómez, J. Céspedes-Lorente, and R. Valle-Cabrera, “Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 715–725, 2005.
[13]
B. Hedberg, “How organizations learn and unlearn,” in Handbook of Organizational Design, C. Nystrom and W. Starbuck, Eds., Oxford, UK, 1981.
[14]
S. B. Sitkin, “Learning through failure,” in Organizational Learning, M. Cohen and L. Sproull, Eds., Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 1996.
[15]
M. Popper and R. Lipshitz, “Organizational learning: mechanisms, culture, and feasibility,” Management Learning, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 181–196, 2000.
[16]
H. Bapuji and M. Crossan, “From questions to answers: reviewing organizational learning research,” Management Learning, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 397–417, 2004.
[17]
J. S. Brown and P. Duguid, “Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation,” Organization Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 40–57, 1991.
[18]
W. N. Isaacs, “Taking flight: dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 24–39, 1993.
[19]
E. H. Schein, “On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 40–51, 1993.
[20]
P. Senge, The Fifth Discipline, Doubleday, New York, NY, USA, 1990.
[21]
M. Easterby-Smith, M. Crossan, and D. Nicolini, “Organizational learning: debates past, present and future,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 783–796, 2000.
[22]
C. Oswick, P. Anthony, T. Keenoy, I. L. Mangham, and D. Grant, “A dialogic analysis of organizational learning,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 887–902, 2000.
[23]
J. L. Cotton, D. A. Vollrath, K. L. Foggat, M. L. Lengnick-Hall, and K. R. Jennings, “Employee participation: diverse forms and different outcomes,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 8–22, 1988.
[24]
B. Scott-Ladd and C. C. Chan, “Emotional intelligence and participation in decision-making: strategies for promoting organizational learning and change,” Strategic Change, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 95–105, 2004.
[25]
J. A. Parnell and W. Crandall, “Rethinking participative decision making: a refinement of the propensity for participative decision making scale,” Personnel Review, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 523–535, 2001.
[26]
R. Stata and P. Almond, Organizational Learning: The Key to Management Innovation, The Training and Development Sourcebook 2, 1989.
[27]
M. E. McGill and J. W. Slocum Jr., “Unlearning the organization,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 67–79, 1993.
[28]
D. A. Garvin, “Building a learning organization,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 78–91, 1993.
[29]
I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
[30]
J. W. Slocum Jr., M. Mcgill, and D. T. Lei, “The new learning strategy: anytime, anything, anywhere,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 33–47, 1994.
[31]
S. F. Slater and J. C. Narver, “Market orientation and the learning organization,” The Journal of Marketing, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 63–74, 1995.
[32]
J.-C. Spender, “Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, pp. 45–62, 1996.
[33]
A. P. O. Williams, “A belief-focused process model of organizational learning,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 67–85, 2001.
[34]
D. Lei, J. W. Slocum, and R. A. Pitts, “Designing organizations for competitive advantage: the power of unlearning and learning,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 24–38, 2000.
[35]
A. P. De Geus, Planning as Learning, Harvard Business Review, 1988.
[36]
I. Nonaka, “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organization Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14–37, 1994.
[37]
J. M. Sinkula, “Market information processing and organizational learning,” The Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 1994.
[38]
D. Leonard-Barton, “The factory as a learning laboratory,” in Operations Management: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, vol. 2, p. 456, 2003.
[39]
F. Kofman and P. M. Senge, “Communities of commitment: the heart of learning organizations,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 5–23, 1993.
[40]
D. H. Kim, The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management, 1998.
[41]
D. Miller, “A preliminary typology of organizational learning: synthesizing the literature,” Journal of Management, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 485–505, 1996.
[42]
R. M. Grant, “Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration,” Organization Science, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 375–387, 1996.
[43]
M. E. McGill, J. W. Slocum Jr., and D. Lei, “Management practices in learning organizations,” Organizational Dynamics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 1992.
[44]
J. L. Naman and D. P. Slevin, “Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: a model and empirical tests,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 137–153, 1993.
[45]
W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 128–152, 1990.
[46]
G. Szulanski, “Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, pp. 27–43, 1996.
[47]
D. Nicolini and M. B. Meznar, “The social construction of organizational learning: conceptual and practical issues in the field,” Human Relations, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 727–746, 1995.
[48]
S. A. Snell, M. A. Youndt, and P. M. Wright, “Establishing a framework for research in strategic human resource management: merging resource theory and organizational learning,” Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 14, pp. 61–90, 1996.
[49]
G. P. Huber, “Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures,” Organization Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 88–115, 1991.
[50]
J. P. Walsh and G. R. Ungson, “Organizational memory,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 57–91, 1991.
[51]
B. Levitt and J. G. March, “Organizational learning,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 14, pp. 319–340, 1988.
[52]
H. A. Simon, “Bounded rationality and organizational learning,” Organization Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 125–134, 1991.
[53]
P. M. Senge and J. D. Sterman, “Systems thinking and organizational learning: acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 137–150, 1992.
[54]
S. A. Mohrman, A. M. Mohrman Jr., and S. G. Cohen, “Organizing knowledge work systems,” Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, vol. 2, pp. 61–91, 1995.
[55]
T. M. Amabile, Creativity and Innovation in Organizations, Harvard Business School, 1996.
[56]
S. G. Isaksen, K. J. Lauer, and G. Ekvall, “Situational outlook questionnaire: a measure of the climate for creativity and change,” Psychological Reports, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 665–674, 1999.
