Nursing is a discipline in transition. As the complexity and acuity of patients increase, nurses are taking on a more comprehensive role in health care leadership and patient outcomes. As the discipline has evolved so has the curricular framework of nursing educational programs, moving from being based on a specific nursing theory, to a general metaparadigm, to the current focus on meeting curricular content standards developed by national accrediting agencies. When considering the skills needed to fully engage in critical thinking and patient advocacy there may be room for an additional curricular focus: that of metacognitive development based on critical theory and constructivism. The empowerment of students via metacognitive and self-evaluative practices also supports the critical theory pedagogy. If graduating nurses are presented with a cohesive and comprehensive curriculum that meets the need for competent and critically reflexive nurses the discipline of nursing can continue to expand in function and voice. The use of metacognition, constructivism, competency, and critical pedagogies in a unified and broad curricular framework allows for the development of these essential skills in contemporary nursing practice. This paper presents this innovative curricular framework that embodies these various teaching and learning perspectives. 1. Introduction Nursing is a discipline in transition. As the complexity and acuity of patients increase, nurses are taking on a more comprehensive role in health care leadership and patient outcomes. As the discipline has evolved so has the curricular framework of nursing educational programs, moving from being based on a specific nursing theory, to a general metaparadigm, to the current focus on meeting curricular content standards developed by national accrediting agencies. In the 1970s there was a call from accrediting agencies and nursing education for each nursing program to choose a specific nursing theory as their conceptual framework for curriculum development, such as Orem’s self-care deficit theory. This was found to be inadequate to meet curricular needs, as specific nursing theories mainly focus upon health issues rather than being a comprehensive curricular theory [1]. Nursing education next moved to utilizing a metaparadigm conceptual framework to focus curricular development upon. In this model the metaparadigm of nursing including concepts of person, environment, health, and nursing was employed to communicate the holistic view of the human experience related to the discipline of nursing. Yet this model
References
[1]
V. A. Berbiglia, “The self-care deficit nursing theory as a curriculum conceptual framework in baccalaureate education,” Nursing Science Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 137–145, 2011.
[2]
P. Webber, “A curriculum framework for nursing,” Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2002.
[3]
American Association of Colleges (AACN), The Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice, American Association of Colleges, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
[4]
M. Horkheimer, Critical Theory: Selected Essays, Continuum International Publication Group, London, UK, 1975.
[5]
C. Fuchs, “Critical theory of information, communication, media, and technology,” 2013, http://www.heathwoodpress.com/critical-theory-of-information-communication-media-technology/.
[6]
D. Martindale, The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory, Waveland Press, Project Heights, Ill, USA, 2nd edition, 1981.
[7]
K. D. Buck and P. H. Lysaker, “Addressing metacognitive capacity in the psychotherapy for Schizophrenia: a case study,” Clinical Case Studies, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 463–472, 2009.
[8]
L. Chartier, “Use of metacognition in developing diagnostic reasoning skills of novice nurses,” International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 55–60, 2001.
[9]
B. Kim, H. Park, and Y. Baek, “Not just fun, but serious strategies: using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning,” Computers and Education, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 800–810, 2009.
[10]
P. J. Worrell, “Metacognition: implications for instruction in nursing education,” The Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 170–175, 1990.
[11]
K. J. Aceti and Y. Wang, “The teaching and learning of multimeaning words within a metacognitively based curriculum,” The American Annals of the Deaf, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 118–123, 2010.
[12]
M. E. Fonteyn and M. Cahill, “The use of clinical logs to improve nursing students' metacognition: a pilot study,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 149–154, 1998.
[13]
D. Scott, Critical Essays on Major Curriculum Theorists, Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
[14]
R. Kuiper, “Enhancing metacognition through the reflective use of self-regulated learning strategies,” Journal of continuing education in nursing, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 78–87, 2002.
[15]
A. F. Nilsson and C. Silén, “‘You have to know why’: the influence of different curricula on nursing students' perceptions of nursing,” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 631–642, 2010.
[16]
M. Apple, Ideology and Curriculum, RoutledgeFalmer, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2009.
[17]
K. Iverson and D. Colky, “Scenario-based e-learning design,” Performance Improvement, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2004.
[18]
P. Doolittle and W. Camp, “Constructivism: the career and technical education perspective [electronic version],” Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, vol. 16, no. 1, 1999.
[19]
M. O. Forbes and M. T. Hickey, “Curriculum reform in baccalaureate nursing education: review of the literature,” International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, vol. 6, no. 1, article 27, 2009.
[20]
C. Windsor, C. Douglas, and T. Harvey, “Nursing and competencies—a natural fit: the politics of skill/competency formation in nursing,” Nursing Inquiry, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 213–222, 2012.
[21]
J. Goudreau, J. Pepin, S. Dubois, L. Boyer, C. Larue, and A. Legault, “A second generation of the competency-based approach to nursing education,” International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, vol. 6, no. 1, 2009.
[22]
L. Carlson, N. Crawford, and S. Contrades, “Nursing student novice to expert—Benner's research applied to education,” The Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 188–190, 1989.
[23]
M. Banning, “Clinical reasoning and its application to nursing: concepts and research studies,” Nurse Education in Practice, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 177–183, 2008.
[24]
R. A. Kuiper and D. J. Pesut, “Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: self-regulated learning theory,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 381–391, 2004.
[25]
J. A. Marcum, “An integrated model of clinical reasoning: dual-process theory of cognition and metacognition,” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 954–961, 2012.
[26]
S. P. Lajoie and J. Lu, “Supporting collaboration with technology: does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine?” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–62, 2012.
[27]
M. Huba and J. Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Mass, USA, 2000.
[28]
M. E. Jones, P. D. Antonenko, and C. M. Greenwood, “The impact of collaborative and individualized student response system strategies on learner motivation, metacognition, and knowledge transfer,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 477–487, 2012.
[29]
L. Fiorella, J. J. Vogel-Walcutt, and S. Fiore, “Differential impact of two types of metacognitive prompting provided during simulation-based training,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 696–702, 2012.
[30]
S. Merriam and R. Caffarella, Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 1999.
[31]
W. Pinar, What is Curriculum Theory?Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2012.
[32]
American Nurses Association, “Code of ethics for nurses,” 2001, http://www.nursingworld.org/codeofethics.
[33]
J. Mezirow, “A critical theory of adult learning and education,” Adult Education Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3–24, 1981.
