全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

HYEI: A New Hybrid Evolutionary Imperialist Competitive Algorithm for Fuzzy Knowledge Discovery

DOI: 10.1155/2014/970541

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In recent years, imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA), genetic algorithm (GA), and hybrid fuzzy classification systems have been successfully and effectively employed for classification tasks of data mining. Due to overcoming the gaps related to ineffectiveness of current algorithms for analysing high-dimension independent datasets, a new hybrid approach, named HYEI, is presented to discover generic rule-based systems in this paper. This proposed approach consists of three stages and combines an evolutionary-based fuzzy system with two ICA procedures to generate high-quality fuzzy-classification rules. Initially, the best feature subset is selected by using the embedded ICA feature selection, and then these features are used to generate basic fuzzy-classification rules. Finally, all rules are optimized by using an ICA algorithm to reduce their length or to eliminate some of them. The performance of HYEI has been evaluated by using several benchmark datasets from the UCI machine learning repository. The classification accuracy attained by the proposed algorithm has the highest classification accuracy in 6 out of the 7 dataset problems and is comparative to the classification accuracy of the 5 other test problems, as compared to the best results previously published. 1. Introduction In general, fuzzy logic is closer to human logic; thus it can deal with real-world noise and imprecise data [1, 2]. Fuzzy models have several advantages. The most important advantage is that they have flexible decision boundaries, and thus, they are characterized by their higher ability to adjust to a specific domain of application and accurately reflect its particularities. A fuzzy model can be generated by describing a fuzzy-classification rule set and then improved by decreasing the length and the number of rules. This approach is a complex task, since several issues must be resolved for the fuzzy model which are produced. First, the basic fuzzy-classification rules must be well defined. In the optimization stage, the length of rules is reduced and when length of one rule equals zero then the mentioned rule will be removed from the rule set. The resulted rule set will be more interpretable since it has fewer number of rules. Several approaches have been suggested in the literature for the improvement of knowledge-based fuzzy models. In most of them, the model is trained using a recognized optimization technique (i.e., fuzzy rules with genetic algorithms [3]). In this work, we propose an algorithm for generating high-quality fuzzy-classification rules which includes three

References

[1]  L. H. Tsoukalas and R. E. Uhrig, Fuzzy and Neural Approaches in Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
[2]  L.-X. Wang, A Course in Fuzzy Systems, Prentice-Hall Press, New York, NY, USA, 1999.
[3]  W. Pedrycz and J. V. de Oliveira, “An algorithmic framework for development and optimization of fuzzy models,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 37–55, 1996.
[4]  T. Elomaa and J. Rousu, “General and efficient multisplitting of numerical attributes,” Machine Learning, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 201–244, 1999.
[5]  J. Catlett, “On changing continuous attributes into ordered discrete attributes,” in Machine Learning-EWSL-91, pp. 164–178, 1991.
[6]  U. Fayyad and K. Irani, “Multi-interval discretization of continuous-valued attributes for classification learning,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Uncertainty in AI, pp. 1022–1027, 1993.
[7]  M. G. Tsipouras, T. P. Exarchos, and D. I. Fotiadis, “A methodology for automated fuzzy model generation,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 159, no. 23, pp. 3201–3220, 2008.
[8]  R. Konig, U. Johansson, and L. Niklasson, “Increasing rule extraction comprehensibility,” International Journal of Information Technology and Intelligent Computing, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 303–314, 2006.
[9]  H. Ishibuchi and Y. Nojima, “Analysis of interpretability-accuracy tradeoff of fuzzy systems by multiobjective fuzzy genetics-based machine learning,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 4–31, 2007.
[10]  Y. Wang, F. S. Makedon, J. C. Ford, and J. Pearlman, “HykGene: a hybrid approach for selecting marker genes for phenotype classification using microarray gene expression data,” Bioinformatics, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1530–1537, 2005.
[11]  L. J. Buturovi?, “PCP: a program for supervised classification of gene expression profiles,” Bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 245–247, 2006.
[12]  L. Ein-Dor, I. Kela, G. Getz, D. Givol, and E. Domany, “Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set?” Bioinformatics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 171–178, 2005.
[13]  K. Y. Yeung, R. E. Bumgarner, and A. E. Raftery, “Bayesian model averaging: development of an improved multi-class, gene selection and classification tool for microarray data,” Bioinformatics, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 2394–2402, 2005.
[14]  H. Yu, J. Ni, and J. Zhao, “ACOSampling: an ant colony optimization-based undersampling method for classifying imbalanced DNA microarray data,” Neurocomputing, vol. 101, pp. 309–318, 2013.
[15]  A. Statnikov, C. F. Aliferis, I. Tsamardinos, D. Hardin, and S. Levy, “A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microarray gene expression cancer diagnosis,” Bioinformatics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 631–643, 2005.
[16]  T. Prasartvit, A. Banharnsakun, B. Kaewkamnerdpong, and T. Achalakul, “Reducing bioinformatics data dimension with ABC-kNN,” Neurocomputing, vol. 116, pp. 367–381, 2012.
[17]  A. Zibakhsh and M. S. Abadeh, “Gene selection for cancer tumor detection using a novel memetic algorithm with a multi-view fitness function,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1274–1281, 2013.
[18]  L.-Y. Chuang, H.-W. Chang, C.-J. Tu, and C.-H. Yang, “Improved binary PSO for feature selection using gene expression data,” Computational Biology and Chemistry, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2008.
[19]  H. Ishibuchi, K. Nozaki, and H. Tanaka, “Distributed representation of fuzzy rules and its application to pattern classification,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 1992.
[20]  D. Meng and Z. Pei, “Extracting linguistic rules from data sets using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms,” Neurocomputing, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 48–54, 2012.
[21]  I. Gadaras and L. Mikhailov, “An interpretable fuzzy rule-based classification methodology for medical diagnosis,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 25–41, 2009.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133