Purpose of the Study To systematically review cost, cost-minimization and cost-effectiveness studies for assisted living technologies (ALTs) that specifically enable older people to ‘age in place’ and highlight what further research is needed to inform decisions regarding aging in place. Design People aged 65+ and their live-in carers (where applicable), using an ALT to age in place at home opposed to a community-dwelling arrangement. Methods Studies were identified using a predefined search strategy on two key economic and cost evaluation databases NHS EED, HEED. Studies were assessed using methods recommended by the Campbell and Cochrane Economic Methods Group and presented in a narrative synthesis style. Results Eight eligible studies were identified from North America spread over a diverse geographical range. The majority of studies reported the ALT intervention group as having lower resource use costs than the control group; though the low methodological quality and heterogeneity of the individual costs and outcomes reported across studies must be considered. Implications The studies suggest that in some cases ALTs may reduce costs, though little data were identified and what there were was of poor quality. Methods to capture quality of life gains were not used, therefore potential effects on health and wellbeing may be missed. Further research is required using newer developments such as the capabilities approach. High quality studies assessing the cost-effectiveness of ALTs for ageing in place are required before robust conclusion on their use can be drawn.
References
[1]
Gitlin LN (2003) Conducting Research on Home Environments: Lessons Learned and New Directions. The Gerontologist 43: 628–637. doi: 10.1093/geront/43.5.628
[2]
Wiles JL, Leibing A, Guberman N, Reeve J, Allen RES (2011) The Meaning of “Ageing in Place” to Older People. The Gerontologist.
[3]
Beer JM, Smarr C, Chen TL, Prakash A, Mitzner TL, et al. (2012) The domesticated robot: Design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place; 2012 5–8 March 2012. pp. 335–342.
[4]
World Health Organization (2014) Definition of an older or elderly person. Proposed Working Definition of an Older Person in Africa for the MDS Project.
[5]
Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, Dixon J, Doll H, et al. (2012) Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. British Medical Journal 344..
[6]
Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S, Dookhy R, Doarn CR, et al. (2007) What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 13: 573–590. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0073
[7]
Halford S, Lotherington AT, Obstfelder A, Dyb K (2010) GETTING THE WHOLE PICTURE? New information and communication technologies in healthcare work and organization. Information Communication & Society 13: 442–465. doi: 10.1080/13691180903095856
[8]
Martin S, Kelly G, Kernohan G, McCreight B, Nugent C (2008) Smart home technologies for health and social care support. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008. The Cochrane Library: John Wiley & Sons.
[9]
Barlow J, Singh D, Bayer S, Curry R (2007) A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 13: 172–179. doi: 10.1258/135763307780908058
[10]
Bowes A, McColgan G (2006) Smart technology and community care for older people: innovation in West Lothian, Scotland. Age Concern Scotland.
[11]
Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (2005) Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes; Publications OM, editor.
[12]
Bahaadinbeigy K, Yogesan K, Wootton R (2010) Gaps in the systematic reviews of the telemedicine field. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 16: 414–416. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100505
[13]
Shemilt I, Byford S, Drummond M, Eisenstein E, Knapp M, et al. (2008) Incorporating Economics Evidence. In Higgins J, Green S (eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: Hohn Wiley & Sons.
[14]
Shemilt I, McDaid D, Marsh K, Henderson C, Bertranou E, et al. (2013) Issues in the incorporation of economic perspectives and evidence into Cochrane reviews. Systematic reviews 2..
[15]
Shemilt I, Mugford M, Donaldson C, Vale L, Marsh K (2010) Evidence-based decisions and economics: lessons for practice. Evidence based economics. London: Wiley Books.
[16]
Brunetti M, Shemilt I, Pregno S, Vale L, Oxman AD, et al. (2013) GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 66: 140–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.012
[17]
Jefferson T, Demicheli V, Entwistle V (1995) ASSESSING QUALITY OF ECONOMIC SUBMISSIONS TO THE BMJ. British Medical Journal 311: 393–394. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.393c
[18]
Higgins JPT, (editors) GS (2009) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration.
[19]
Mann WC, Ottenbacher KJ, Fraas L, Tomita M, Granger CV (1999) Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly - A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Family Medicine 8: 210–217. doi: 10.1001/archfami.8.3.210
[20]
Johnston B, Wheeler L, Deuser J, Sousa KH (2000) Outcomes of the Kaiser Permanente tele-home health research project. Archives of Family Medicine 9: 40–45. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.1.40
[21]
Noel HC, Vogel DC (2000) Resource costs and quality of life outcomes for homebound elderly using telemedicine integrated with nurse case management. Care Management 6(5): : 22–24, 26–82, 30–31.
[22]
Noel HC, Vogel DC, Erdos JJ, Cornwall D, Levin F (2004) Home telehealth reduces Healthcare costs. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 10: 170–183. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2004.10.170
[23]
Finkelstein SM, Speedie SM, Potthoff S (2006) Home telehealth improves clinical outcomes at lower cost for home healthcare. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 12: 128–136. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.128
[24]
Bendixen RM, Levy CE, Olive ES, Kobb RF, Mann WC (2009) Cost Effectiveness of a Telerehabilitation Program to Support Chronically Ill and Disabled Elders in Their Homes. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 15: 31–38. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0046
[25]
Wray LO, Shulan MD, Toseland RW, Freeman KE, Vasquez BE, et al. (2010) The Effect of Telephone Support Groups on Costs of Care for Veterans With Dementia. Gerontologist 50: 623–631. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq040
[26]
Vincent C, Reinharz D, Deaudelin I, Garceau M, Talbot LR (2006) Public telesurveillance service for frail elderly living at home, outcomes and cost evolution: a quasi experimental design with two follow-ups. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 4..
[27]
Briggs AH, O'Brien BJ (2001) The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Economics 10(2): 179–184. doi: 10.1002/hec.584
[28]
Burdine JN, Felix MRJ, Abel AL, Wiltraut CJ, Musselman YJ (2000) The SF-12 as a population health measure: An exploratory examination of potential for application. Health Services Research 35: 885–904.
[29]
Lushai G, Cox T (2012) Assisted Living Technology, a market and technology review. University of the West of England.
[30]
Aanesen M, Lotherington AT, Olsen F (2011) Smarter elder care? A cost-effectiveness analysis of implementing technology in elder care. Health Informatics Journal 17: 161–172. doi: 10.1177/1460458211409716
[31]
Vimarlund V, Olve N-G (2005) Economic analyses for ICT in elderly healthcare: questions and challenges. Health Informatics Journal 11: 309–321. doi: 10.1177/1460458205058758
[32]
Whitten PS, Mair FS, Haycox A, May CR, Williams TL, et al. (2002) Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. BMJ 324: 1434–1437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1434
[33]
Grewal I, Lewis J, Flynn T, Brown J, Bond J, et al. (2006) Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: Preferences or capabilities? Social Science & Medicine 62: 1891–1901. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.023
[34]
Coast J, Flynn TN, Natarajan L, Sproston K, Lewis J, et al. (2008) Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Social Science & Medicine 67: 874–882. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.015
[35]
Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernández J, Beecham J, Hirani SP, et al. (2013) Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 346..
[36]
Davis JC, Bryan S, McLeod R, Rogers J, Khan K, et al. (2012) Exploration of the association between quality of life, assessed by the EQ-5D and ICECAP-O, and falls risk, cognitive function and daily function, in older adults with mobility impairments. Bmc Geriatrics 12..
