全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

Phenology and Cover of Plant Growth Forms Predict Herbivore Habitat Selection in a High Latitude Ecosystem

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100780

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The spatial and temporal distribution of forage quality is among the most central factors affecting herbivore habitat selection. Yet, for high latitude areas, forage quantity has been found to be more important than quality. Studies on large ungulate foraging patterns are faced with methodological challenges in both assessing animal movements at the scale of forage distribution, and in assessing forage quality with relevant metrics. Here we use first-passage time analyses to assess how reindeer movements relate to forage quality and quantity measured as the phenology and cover of growth forms along reindeer tracks. The study was conducted in a high latitude ecosystem dominated by low-palatable growth forms. We found that the scale of reindeer movement was season dependent, with more extensive area use as the summer season advanced. Small-scale movement in the early season was related to selection for younger stages of phenology and for higher abundances of generally phenologically advanced palatable growth forms (grasses and deciduous shrubs). Also there was a clear selection for later phenological stages of the most dominant, yet generally phenologically slow and low-palatable growth form (evergreen shrubs). As the summer season advanced only quantity was important, with selection for higher quantities of one palatable growth form and avoidance of a low palatable growth form. We conclude that both forage quality and quantity are significant predictors to habitat selection by a large herbivore at high latitude. The early season selectivity reflected that among dominating low palatability growth forms there were palatable phenological stages and palatable growth forms available, causing herbivores to be selective in their habitat use. The diminishing selectivity and the increasing scale of movement as the season developed suggest a response by reindeer to homogenized forage availability of low quality.

References

[1]  Hanley TA (1997) A nutritional view of understanding and complexity in the problem of diet selection by deer (Cervidae). Oikos: 209–218. doi: 10.2307/3546006
[2]  Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas D, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals. Statistical design and analysis for field studies: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[3]  McArthur C (1993) Diet selection by a ruminant generalist browser in relation to plant chemistry. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 2236–2243. doi: 10.1139/z93-314
[4]  Trudell J, White RG (1981) The effect of forage structure and availability on food intake, biting rate, bite size and daily eating time of reindeer. Journal of Applied Ecology 18: 63–81. doi: 10.2307/2402479
[5]  Skogland T (1984) Wild reindeer foraging-niche organisation. Holarctic Ecology 7: 345–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1984.tb01138.x
[6]  Van Soest PJ (1994) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 7–21 p.
[7]  Klein DR (1990) Variation in quality of caribou and reindeer forage plants associated with season, plant part, and phenology. Rangifer 3: 123–130. doi: 10.7557/2.10.3.841
[8]  M?rell A, Hofgaard A, Danell K (2006) Nutrient dynamics of reindeer forage species along snowmelt gradients at different ecological scales. Basic and Applied Ecology 7: 13–30. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2005.04.005
[9]  Zweifel-Schielly B, Kreuzer M, Ewald KC, Suter W (2009) Habitat selection by an Alpine ungulate: the significance of forage characteristics varies with scale and season. Ecography 32: 103–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05178.x
[10]  Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons ltd. 417 p.
[11]  Iversen M, Br?then KA, Yoccoz N, Ims RA (2009) Predictors of plant phenology in a diverse high-latitude alpine landscape: growth forms and topography. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 903–915. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01088.x
[12]  Miller-Rushing AJ, Primack RB (2008) Global warming and flowering times in Thoreau's concord: A community perspective. Ecology 89: 332–341. doi: 10.1890/07-0068.1
[13]  Wielgolaski F, K?renlampi L (1975) Plant phenology of Fennoscandian tundra areas. Fennoscandian tundra ecosystems: Springer. pp. 94–102.
[14]  Chapin FS III, Bret-Harte SM, Hobbie SE, Zhong H (1996) Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 347–358. doi: 10.2307/3236278
[15]  Kudo G (1991) Effects of snow-free period on the phenology of alpine plants inhabiting snow patches. Arctic and Alpine Research 23: 436–443. doi: 10.2307/1551685
[16]  Wookey PA, Aerts R, Bardgett RD, Baptist F, Brathen KA, et al. (2009) Ecosystem feedbacks and cascade processes: understanding their role in the responses of Arctic and alpine ecosystems to environmental change. Global Change Biology 15: 1153–1172. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01801.x
[17]  Albon SD, Langvatn R (1992) Plant phenology and the benefits of migration in a temperate ungulate. Oikos 65: 502–513. doi: 10.2307/3545568
[18]  Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC (2001) Plant phenology, migration and geographical variation in body weight of a large herbivore: the effect of a variable topography. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 915–923. doi: 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00559.x
[19]  Pettorelli N, Dray S, Gaillard JM, Chessel D, Duncan P, et al. (2003) Spatial variation in springtime food resources influences the winter body mass of roe deer fawns. Oecologia 137: 363–369. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1364-7
[20]  Post E, Boving PS, Pedersen C, MacArthur MA (2003) Synchrony between caribou calving and plant phenology in depredated and non-depredated populations. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 81: 1709–1714. doi: 10.1139/z03-172
[21]  Post E, Stenseth NC (1999) Climatic variability, plant phenology, and northern ungulates. Ecology 80: 1322–1339. doi: 10.2307/177078
[22]  Skogland T (1989) Natural-selection of wild reindeer life-history traits by food limitation and predation. Oikos 55: 101–110. doi: 10.2307/3565879
[23]  Demment MW, Vansoest PJ (1985) A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. American Naturalist 125: 641–672. doi: 10.1086/284369
[24]  Fryxell JM (1991) Forage quality and aggregation by large herbivores. American Naturalist 138: 478–498. doi: 10.1086/285227
[25]  Hansen BB, Aanes R, Herfindal I, Saether BE, Henriksen S (2009) Winter habitat-space use in a large arctic herbivore facing contrasting forage abundance. Polar Biology 32: 971–984. doi: 10.1007/s00300-009-0597-2
[26]  Br?then KA, Ims RA, Yoccoz NG, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, et al. (2007) Induced shift in ecosystem productivity? Extensive scale effects of abundant large herbivores. Ecosystems 10: 773–789. doi: 10.1007/s10021-007-9058-3
[27]  Palmer SCF, Hester AJ, Elston DA, Gordon IJ, Hartley SE (2003) The perils of having tasty neighbors: Grazing impacts of large herbivores at vegetation boundaries. Ecology 84: 2877–2890. doi: 10.1890/02-0245
[28]  M?rell A, Ball JP, Hofgaard A (2002) Foraging and movement paths of female reindeer: insights from fractal analysis, correlated random walks, and Lévy flights. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80: 854–865. doi: 10.1139/z02-061
[29]  Van der Wal R, Madan N, van Lieshout S, Dormann C, Langvatn R, et al. (2000) Trading forage quality for quantity? Plant phenology and patch choice by Svaldbard reindeer|. Oecologia 123: 108–115. doi: 10.1007/s004420050995
[30]  Hansen BB, Herfindal I, Aanes R, Saether BE, Henriksen S (2009) Functional response in habitat selection and the tradeoffs between foraging niche components in a large herbivore. Oikos 118: 859–872. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17098.x
[31]  Meir P, Cox P, Grace J (2006) The influence of terrestrial ecosystems on climate. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 254–260. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.005
[32]  Noble IR, Gitay H (1996) A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 329–336. doi: 10.2307/3236276
[33]  Dorrepaal E (2007) Are plant growth-form-based classifications useful in predicting northern ecosystem carbon cycling feedbacks to climate change? Journal of Ecology 95: 1167–1180. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01294.x
[34]  Skogland T (1980) Comparative summer feeding strategies of arctic and alpine Rangifer. Journal of Animal Ecology 49: 81–98. doi: 10.2307/4278
[35]  White RG (1983) Foraging patterns and their multiplier effects on productivity of northern ungulates. Oikos 40: 377–384. doi: 10.2307/3544310
[36]  Lavorel S, Grigulis K (2012) How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale-up to trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology 100: 128–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01914.x
[37]  Dorrepaal E, Cornelissen JHC, Aerts R (2007) Changing leaf litter feedbacks on plant production across contrasting sub-arctic peatland species and growth forms. Oecologia 151: 251–261. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0580-3
[38]  Senft RL, Coughenour MB, Bailey DW, Rittenhouse LR, Sala OE, et al. (1987) Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience 37: 789–799. doi: 10.2307/1310545
[39]  Wiens JA, Stenseth NC, Vanhorne B, Ims RA (1993) Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369–380. doi: 10.2307/3544931
[40]  Cagnacci F, Boitani L, Powell RA, Boyce MS (2010) Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 365: 2157–2162. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0107
[41]  Gaillard JM, Hebblewhite M, Loison A, Fuller M, Powell R, et al. (2010) Habitat-performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 365: 2255–2265. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0085
[42]  Pettorelli N, Ryan S, Mueller T, Bunnefeld N, Jedrzejewska B, et al. (2011) The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI): unforeseen successes in animal ecology. Climate Research 46: 15–27. doi: 10.3354/cr00936
[43]  White RG, Trudell J (1980) Habitat preference and forage consumption by reindeer and caribou near Atkasook, Alaska. Arctic and Alpine Research 12: 511–529. doi: 10.2307/1550498
[44]  Fauchald P, Tveraa T (2003) Using first-passage time in the analysis of area-restricted search and habitat selection. Ecology 84: 282–288. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0282:ufptit]2.0.co;2
[45]  Moen A (1998) National Atlas of Norway: Vegetation; Lillethun A, editor. H?nefoss: Norwegian Mapping Authority. 200 p.
[46]  Farbrot H, Isaksen K, Etzelmüller B (2008) Present and past distribution of mountain permafrost in the Gaissane Mountains, Northern Norway. Ninth International Conference on Permafrost. University of Alaska Fairbanks: Fairbanks: Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska. pp. 427–432.
[47]  Ballesteros M, Bardsen BJ, Langeland K, Fauchald P, Stien A, et al. (2012) The effect of warble flies on reindeer fitness: a parasite removal experiment. Journal of Zoology 287: 34–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00883.x
[48]  Bardsen BJ, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Langeland K, Yoccoz NG, et al. (2008) Experimental evidence of a risk-sensitive reproductive allocation in a long-lived mammal. Ecology 89: 829–837. doi: 10.1890/07-0414.1
[49]  Shevtsova A, Haukioja E, Ojala A (1997) Growth response of subarctic dwarf shrubs, Empetrum nigrum and Vaccinium vitis-idea, to manipulated environmental conditions and species removal. Oikos 78: 440–458. doi: 10.2307/3545606
[50]  Br?then KA, Agrell J, Berteaux D, Jónsdóttir IS (2004) Intraclonal variation in defence substances and palatability: A study on Carex and lemmings. Oikos 105: 461–470. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12926.x
[51]  Wintle BC, Fidler F, Vesk PA, L Moore J (2013) Improving visual estimation through active feedback. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4: 53–62. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00254.x
[52]  Kirkerud K (1989) Object oriented Programming with SIMULA. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
[53]  Pinaud D (2008) Quantifying search effort of moving animals at several spatial scales using first-passage time analysis: effect of the structure of environment and tracking systems. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 91–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01370.x
[54]  Fauchald P, Tveraa T (2006) Hierarchical Patch Dynamics and Animal Movement Pattern. Oecologia 149: 383–395. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0463-7
[55]  Hamer KC, Humphreys EM, Magalhaes MC, Garthe S, Hennicke J, et al. (2009) Fine-scale foraging behaviour of a medium-ranging marine predator. Journal of Animal Ecology 78: 880–889. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01549.x
[56]  Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. London: Taylor & Francis, CRC Press.
[57]  Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Linear mixed-effects models: basic concepts and examples: Springer.
[58]  Mysterud A, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC, Langvatn R (2000) Relationships between sex ratio, climate and density in red deer: the importance of spatial scale. Journal of Animal Ecology 69: 959–974. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2000.00454.x
[59]  Cornelissen JHC, Quested HM, Gwynn-Jones D, Van Logestijn RSP, De Beus MAH, et al. (2004) Leaf digestibility and litter decomposability are related in a wide range of subarctic plant species and types. Functional Ecology 18: 779–786. doi: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00900.x
[60]  Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65–71. doi: 10.2307/1937156
[61]  Kleyer M, Bekker R, Knevel I, Bakker J, Thompson K, et al. (2008) The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life-history traits of the Northwest European flora. Journal of Ecology 96: 1266–1274. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01430.x
[62]  Nilsson MC, Gallet C, Wallstedt A (1998) Temporal variability of phenolics and batatasin-III in Empetrum hermaphroditum leaves over an eight-year period: interpretations of ecological function. Oikos 81: 6–16. doi: 10.2307/3546462
[63]  Inga B, Danell ? (2012) Traditional ecological knowledge among Sami reindeer herders in northern Sweden about vascular plants grazed by reindeer. Rangifer 32: 1–17. doi: 10.7557/2.32.1.2233
[64]  Skjenneberg S, Slagsvold L (1968) Reindriften og dens naturgrunnlag. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
[65]  Warenberg K, Danell ?, Gaare E, Nieminen M (1997) Flora i reinbeiteland; Ekendahl B, Bye K, editors. Oslo, Norway: Landbruksforlaget.
[66]  Rettie WJ, Messier F (2000) Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors. Ecography 23: 466–478. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2000.230409.x
[67]  Hagemoen RIM, Reimers E (2002) Reindeer summer activity pattern in relation to weather and insect harassment. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: 883–892. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00654.x
[68]  Skarin A, ?hman B (2014) Do human activity and infrastructure disturb domesticated reindeer? The need for the reindeer's perspective. Polar Biology.
[69]  Inga B (2009) Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) feeding on lichens and mushrooms: traditional ecological knowledge among reindeer-herding Sami in northern Sweden. Rangifer 27: 93–106. doi: 10.7557/2.27.2.163
[70]  Jefferies RL, Klein DR, Shaver GR (1994) Vertebrate herbivores and northern plant communities - Reciprocal influences and responses. Oikos 71: 193–206. doi: 10.2307/3546267

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133