全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

Comparing Chemistry to Outcome: The Development of a Chemical Distance Metric, Coupled with Clustering and Hierarchal Visualization Applied to Macromolecular Crystallography

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100782

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Many bioscience fields employ high-throughput methods to screen multiple biochemical conditions. The analysis of these becomes tedious without a degree of automation. Crystallization, a rate limiting step in biological X-ray crystallography, is one of these fields. Screening of multiple potential crystallization conditions (cocktails) is the most effective method of probing a proteins phase diagram and guiding crystallization but the interpretation of results can be time-consuming. To aid this empirical approach a cocktail distance coefficient was developed to quantitatively compare macromolecule crystallization conditions and outcome. These coefficients were evaluated against an existing similarity metric developed for crystallization, the C6 metric, using both virtual crystallization screens and by comparison of two related 1,536-cocktail high-throughput crystallization screens. Hierarchical clustering was employed to visualize one of these screens and the crystallization results from an exopolyphosphatase-related protein from Bacteroides fragilis, (BfR192) overlaid on this clustering. This demonstrated a strong correlation between certain chemically related clusters and crystal lead conditions. While this analysis was not used to guide the initial crystallization optimization, it led to the re-evaluation of unexplained peaks in the electron density map of the protein and to the insertion and correct placement of sodium, potassium and phosphate atoms in the structure. With these in place, the resulting structure of the putative active site demonstrated features consistent with active sites of other phosphatases which are involved in binding the phosphoryl moieties of nucleotide triphosphates. The new distance coefficient, CDcoeff, appears to be robust in this application, and coupled with hierarchical clustering and the overlay of crystallization outcome, reveals information of biological relevance. While tested with a single example the potential applications related to crystallography appear promising and the distance coefficient, clustering, and hierarchal visualization of results undoubtedly have applications in wider fields.

References

[1]  Nikolova N, Jaworska J (2004) Approaches to measure chemical similarity - A review. Qsar & Combinatorial Science 22: 1006–1026. doi: 10.1002/qsar.200330831
[2]  Jancarik J, Kim SH (1991) Sparse matrix sampling: a screening method for crystallization of proteins J Appl Cryst. 24: 409–411. doi: 10.1107/s0021889891004430
[3]  Dumetz AC, Snellinger-O'Brien AM, Kaler EW, Lenhoff AM (2007) Patterns of protein - protein interactions in salt solutions and implications for protein crystallization. Protein Science 16: 1867–1877. doi: 10.1110/ps.072957907
[4]  Snell EH, Nagel RM, Wojtaszcyk A, Wolfley J, O'Neill H, et al. (2008) The application and use of Chemical Space Mapping to interpret crystallization screening results. Acta Cryst D 64: 1240–1249. doi: 10.1107/s0907444908032411
[5]  Nagel RM, Luft JR, Snell EH (2008) AutoSherlock: a program for effective crystallization data analysis. Journal of Applied Crystallography 41: 1173–1176. doi: 10.1107/s0021889808028938
[6]  Newman J, Fazio VJ, Lawson B, Peat TS (2010) The C6 Web Tool: A Resource for the Rational Selection of Crystallization Conditions. Crystal Growth & Design 10: 2785–2792. doi: 10.1021/cg1004209
[7]  Snell EH, Nagel RM, Wojtaszcyk A, O'Neill H, Wolfley JL, et al. (2008) The application and use of chemical space mapping to interpret crystallization screening results. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 64: 1240–1249. doi: 10.1107/s0907444908032411
[8]  Luft JR, Snell EH, DeTitta GT (2011) Lessons from high-throughput protein crystallization screening: 10 years of practical experience. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 6: 465–480. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2011.566857
[9]  Luft JR, Wolfley JR, Said MI, Nagel RM, Lauricella AM, et al. (2007) Efficient optimization of crystallization conditions by manipulation of drop volume ratio and temperature. Protein Science 16: 715–722. doi: 10.1110/ps.062699707
[10]  Collins KD (2006) Ion hydration: Implications for cellular function, polyelectrolytes, and protein crystallization. Biophys Chem 119: 271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2005.08.010
[11]  Kantardjieff KA, Rupp B (2004) Protein isoelectric point as a predictor for increased crystallization screening efficiency. Bioinformatics 20: 2162–2168. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth066
[12]  Willett P, Barnard JM, Downs GM (1998) Chemical similarity searching. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 38: 983–996. doi: 10.1021/ci9800211
[13]  Rogers D, Hahn M (2010) Extended-connectivity fingerprints. J Chem Inf Model 50: 742–754. doi: 10.1021/ci100050t
[14]  Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325–349. doi: 10.2307/1942268
[15]  Huson DH, Richter DC, Rausch C, Dezulian T, Franz M, et al. (2007) Dendroscope: An interactive viewer for large phylogenetic trees. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 460. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-460
[16]  Skokal R, Rohlf J (1926) The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods. Taxon 11: 33–40. doi: 10.2307/1217208
[17]  Rousseeuw PJ (1987) Silhouettes - a Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster-Analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20: 53–65. doi: 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
[18]  Cacace MG, Landau EM, Ramsden JJ (1997) The Hofmeister series: salt and solvent effects on interfacial phenomena. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 30: 241–277. doi: 10.1017/s0033583597003363
[19]  Zhang YJ, Cremer PS (2006) Interactions between macromolecules and ions: the Hofmeister series. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 10: 658–663. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.09.020
[20]  Lance GN, Williams WT (1967) A general theory of classificatory sorting strategies. The Computer Journal 10: 271–277. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/10.3.271
[21]  Krause EF (1987) Taxicab Geometry: An Adventure in Non-Euclidean Geometry. New York: Dover.
[22]  Luft JR, Collins RJ, Fehrman NA, Lauricella AM, Veatch CK, et al. (2003) A deliberate approach to screening for initial crystallization conditions of biological macromolecules. J Struct Biol 142: 170–179. doi: 10.1016/s1047-8477(03)00048-0
[23]  Xiao R, Anderson S, Aramini J, Belote R, Buchwald WA, et al. (2010) The high-throughput protein sample production platform of the Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium. J Struct Biol 172: 21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.07.011
[24]  Acton TB, Xiao R, Anderson S, Aramini JM, Buchwald W, et al. (2011) Preparation of protein samples for NMR structure, function, and small molecule screening studies. Methods Enzymol 493: 21–60. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-381274-2.00002-9
[25]  Cormier CY, Park JG, Fiacco M, Steel J, Hunter P, et al. (2011) PSI:Biology-materials repository: a biologist's resource for protein expression plasmids. J Struct Funct Genomics 12: 55–62. doi: 10.1007/s10969-011-9100-8
[26]  Chayen NE, Stewart PDS, Blow DM (1992) Microbatch Crystallization under Oil - a New Technique Allowing Many Small-Volume Crystallization Trials. Journal of Crystal Growth 122: 176–180. doi: 10.1016/0022-0248(92)90241-a
[27]  Otwinowski Z, Minor W (1997) Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods in Enzymology 276: 307–326. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(97)76066-x
[28]  Sheldrick GM (2010) Experimental phasing with SHELXC/D/E: combining chain tracing with density modification. Acta Cryst D66: 479–485. doi: 10.1107/s0907444909038360
[29]  Terwilliger J (1999) Automated MAD and MIR structure solution. Acta Crystallographica D55: 849–861. doi: 10.1107/s0907444999000839
[30]  Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K (2010) Features and Development of Coot Acta Crystallogr. D66: 486–501. doi: 10.1107/s0907444910007493
[31]  Murshudov GN (1997) Refinement of Macromolecular Structures by the Maximum-Likelihood Method. Acta Cryst D53: 240–255. doi: 10.1107/s0907444996012255
[32]  Laskowski RA, Moss DS, Thornton JM (1993) Procheck - programs to check the Stereochemical Quality of Protein Structures. J App Cryst 26: 283. doi: 10.1107/s0021889892009944
[33]  Hofmeister F (1888) Zur Lehre von der Wirkung der Salze. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol (Leipzig) 24: 247–260. doi: 10.1007/bf01918191
[34]  Aravind L, Koonin EV (1998) A novel family of predicted phosphoesterases includes Drosophila prune protein and bacterial RecJ exonuclease. Trends Biochem Sci 23: 17–19. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01162-6
[35]  Allan Matte LWTaLTD (1998) How do kinases transfer phosphoryl groups? Structure 6: 413–419. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(98)00043-4
[36]  Newman J, Bolton EE, Mueller-Dieckmann J, Fazio VJ, Gallagher DT, et al. (2012) On the need for an international effort to capture, share and use crystallization screening data. Acta Crystallographica Section F-Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications 68: 253–258. doi: 10.1107/s1744309112002618
[37]  Luft JR, Wolfley JR, Snell EH (2011) What's in a Drop? Correlating Observations and Outcomes to Guide Macromolecular Crystallization Experiments. Crystal Growth & Design 11: 651–663. doi: 10.1021/cg1013945
[38]  Bergfors T (2003) Seeds to crystals. J Struct Biol 142: 66–76. doi: 10.1016/s1047-8477(03)00039-x
[39]  Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P (2001) SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133