The case-cohort study design combines the advantages of a cohort study with the efficiency of a nested case-control study. However, unlike more standard observational study designs, there are currently no guidelines for reporting results from case-cohort studies. Our aim was to review recent practice in reporting these studies, and develop recommendations for the future. By searching papers published in 24 major medical and epidemiological journals between January 2010 and March 2013 using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Knowledge, we identified 32 papers reporting case-cohort studies. The median subcohort sampling fraction was 4.1% (interquartile range 3.7% to 9.1%). The papers varied in their approaches to describing the numbers of individuals in the original cohort and the subcohort, presenting descriptive data, and in the level of detail provided about the statistical methods used, so it was not always possible to be sure that appropriate analyses had been conducted. Based on the findings of our review, we make recommendations about reporting of the study design, subcohort definition, numbers of participants, descriptive information and statistical methods, which could be used alongside existing STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies.
References
[1]
Prentice RL (1986) A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika 73: 1–11. doi: 10.1093/biomet/73.1.1
[2]
Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Rosner D, Izumi S (1999) Analysis of case-cohort designs. J Clin Epidemiol 52: 1165–1172. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00102-x
[3]
Onland-Moret NC, van der AD, van der Schouw YT, Buschers W, Elias SG, et al. (2007) Analysis of case-cohort data: a comparison of different methods. J Clin Epidemiol 60: 350–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.022
[4]
Barlow WE (1994) Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design. Biometrics 50: 1064–1072. doi: 10.2307/2533444
[5]
Coviello V (2001) Ordinary case-cohort design and analysis. Stata Technical Bulletin 10: 12–18.
[6]
Ploner M, Heinze G (2013) coxphw: Weighted Cox regression. R package version 2.13. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=coxphw.
[7]
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, et al. (2007) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 4: e297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297
[8]
Collett D (2003) Modelling survival data in medical research. Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science Second Edition.
[9]
Xue X, Xie X, Gunter M, Rohan TE, Wassertheil-Smoller S, et al. (2013) Testing the proportional hazards assumption in case-cohort analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol 13: 88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-88
[10]
Thompson S, Kaptoge S, White I, Wood A, Perry P, et al. (2010) Statistical methods for the time-to-event analysis of individual participant data from multiple epidemiological studies. Int J Epidemiol 39: 1345–1359. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq063
[11]
Borgan O, Langholz B, Samuelsen SO, Goldstein L, Pogoda J (2009) Exposure stratified case-cohort designs. Lifetime Data Anal 6: 39–58. doi: 10.1023/a:1009661900674
[12]
White IR, Carlin JB (2010) Bias and efficiency of multiple imputation compared with complete-case analysis for missing covariate values. Stat Med 29: 2920–2931. doi: 10.1002/sim.3944
[13]
Ganna A, Reilly M, de Faire U, Pedersen N, Magnusson P, et al. (2012) Risk prediction measures for case-cohort and nested case-control designs: an application to cardiovascular disease. Am J Epidemiol 175: 715–724. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr374
[14]
Sanderson J, Thompson SG, White IR, Aspelund T, Pennells L (2013) Derivation and assessment of risk prediction models using case-cohort data. BMC Med Res Methodol 13: 113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-113
