| [1] | Laroche C, Soli S, Giguere C, Lagace J, Vaillancourt V, et al. (2003) An approach to the development of hearing standards for hearing-critical jobs. Noise Health 6: 17–37. doi: 10.1080/14992020801894824
|
| [2] | Ozimek E, Warzybok A, Kutzner D (2010) Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise. Int J Audiol 49: 444–454. doi: 10.3109/14992021003681030
|
| [3] | Haumann S, Hohmann V, Meis M, Herzke T, Lenarz T, et al. (2012) Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: Impact of audiological and non-audiological findings. Audiol Research 2: 55–64. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2012.e12
|
| [4] | Zokoll MA, Hochmuth S, Warzybok A, Wagener KC, Buscherm？hle M, et al. (2013) Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics. Am J Audiol 22: 175–178. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0061)
|
| [5] | Plomp R, Mimpen AM (1979) Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiol 18(1): 43–52. doi: 10.3109/00206097909072618
|
| [6] | Hagerman B (1982) Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 11(2): 79–87. doi: 10.3109/01050398209076203
|
| [7] | Kollmeier B, Wesselkamp M (1997) Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am 102(4): 2412–2421. doi: 10.1121/1.419624
|
| [8] | Nilsson M, Soil SD, Sullivan JA (1994) Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95(2): 1085–1099. doi: 10.1121/1.408469
|
| [9] | Wingfield A, McCoy SL, Peelle JE, Tun PA, Cox LC (2006) Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. J Am Ac Audiol 17: 487–497. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.7.4
|
| [10] | Tun PA, Benichov J, Wingfield A (2010) Response latencies in auditory sentence comprehension: Effects of linguistic versus perceptual challenge. Psychol Aging 25(3): 730–735. doi: 10.1037/a0019300
|
| [11] | Kalikow DN, Stevens KN (1977) Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am 61: 1337–1351. doi: 10.1121/1.381436
|
| [12] | Boothroyd A, Nittrouer S (1988) Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 84(1): 101–114. doi: 10.1121/1.396976
|
| [13] | Uslar VN, Ruigendijk E, Hamann C, Brand T, Kollmeier B (2011) Sentence complexity effects in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test: May we ignore psycholinguistics when testing speech in noise? Int J Audiol 50: 621–631. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.582166
|
| [14] | Uslar VN, Carroll R, Hanke M, Hamann C, Ruigendijk E, et al. (2013) Development and evaluation of a linguistically and audiologically controlled sentence intelligibility test. J Acoust Soc Am 134(4): 3039–3056. doi: 10.1121/1.4818760
|
| [15] | Pratt J, Dodd M, Welsh T (2006) Growing older does not always mean moving slower Examining aging and the saccadic motor system. J Motor Behav 38: 373–382. doi: 10.3200/jmbr.38.5.373-382
|
| [16] | Cerella J, Hale S (1994) The rise and fall in information-processing rates over the life span. Acta Psychol 86: 109–197. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(94)90002-7
|
| [17] | Cooper RM (1974) The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A newmethodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychol 6: 84–107.
|
| [18] | Huettig F, Rommers J, Meyer AS (2011) Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychol 137: 151–171. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003
|
| [19] | Tanenhaus MK, Spivey-Knowiton MJ, Eberharda KM, Sedivy JC (1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268: 1632–1634. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863
|
| [20] | Eberhard KM, Spivey-Knowlton MJ, Sedivy JC, Tanenhaus MK (1995) Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. J Psycholinguist Res 24(6): 409–436. doi: 10.1007/bf02143160
|
| [21] | Allopenna PD, Magnuson JS, Tanenhaus MK (1998) Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. J Mem Lang 38: 419–439. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
|
| [22] | Altmann GTM, Kamide Y (1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73: 247–264. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00059-1
|
| [23] | Snedeker J, Trueswell JC (2004) The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychol 49(3): 238–299. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001
|
| [24] | Altmann GTM, Kamide Y (2007) The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. J Mem Lang 57: 502–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004
|
| [25] | Kamide Y, Altmann GTM, Haywood SL (2003) The time course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. J Mem Lang 49: 133–156. doi: 10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00023-8
|
| [26] | Knoeferle P (2007) Comparing the time-course of processing initially ambiguous and unambiguous German SVO/OVS sentences in depicted events. In: van Gompel R, Fischer M, Murray W, Hill R, editors. Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 517–533.
|
| [27] | Knoeferle P, Crocker MW (2006) The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Science 30(3): 481–529. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_65
|
| [28] | Knoeferle P, Crocker MW (2007) The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. J Mem Lang 57: 519–543. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.003
|
| [29] | Knoeferle P, Crocker MW, Scheepers C, Pickering MJ (2005) The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition 95: 95–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.002
|
| [30] | Chambers CG, Tanenhaus MK, Eberhard KM, Filip H, Carlson GN (2002) Circumscribing referential domains during real-time sentence comprehension. J Mem Lang 47: 30–49. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2832
|
| [31] | Huettig F, McQueen JM (2007) The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search. J Mem Lang 57: 460–482. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.001
|
| [32] | Barr DJ, Gann TM, Russell SP (2011) Anticipatory baseline effects and information integration in visual world studies. Acta Psychol 137: 201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.011
|
| [33] | Arnold JE, Fagnano M, Tanenhaus MK (2003) Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. J Psycholinguist Res 32: 25–36.
|
| [34] | Kaiser E, Trueswell JC (2008) Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution. Lang Cogn Process 23(5): 709–748. doi: 10.1080/01690960701771220
|
| [35] | Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall. 436 p.
|
| [36] | van Zandt T (2002) Analysis of response time distributions. In: Wixted JT, editor. Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Vol.4. Methodology in experimental psychology, (third edition). New York: Wiley. pp. 461–516.
|
| [37] | McMurray B, Clayards MA, Tanenhaus MK, Aslin RN (2008) Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition. Psychometric Bulletin & Review 15(6): 1064–1071. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.6.1064
|
| [38] | Toscano J, McMurray B (2012) Cue-integration and context effects in speech: Evidence against speaking-rate normalization. Atten Percept Psychophys 74(6): 1284–1301. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0306-z
|
| [39] | Bader M, Bayer J (2006) Case and linking in language comprehension: Evidence from German. Berlin: Springer 319 p.
|
| [40] | Weskott T, H？rnig R, Fanselow G, Kliegl R (2011) Contextual licensing of marked OVS word order in German. Linguistische Berichte 225: 3–18.
|
| [41] | Bader M, Meng M (1999) Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. J Psycholinguist Res 28(2): 121–143.
|
| [42] | Gorrell P (2000) The subject-before-object preference in German clauses. In: Hemforth B, Konieczny L, editors. German sentence processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 25–63.
|
| [43] | Fanselow G, Lenertová D,Weskott T (2008) Studies on the acceptability of object movement to spec, CP. In: Steube A, editor. Language, Context & Cognition: The discourse potential of underspecified structures. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 413–438.
|
| [44] | Gibson E (2000) The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In: Miyashita Y, Marantz A, O'Neil W, editors. Image, Language, Brain. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, pp. 95–126.
|
| [45] | Gordon PC, Hendrick R, Levine WH (2002) Memory load interference in syntactic processing. Psychol Science 13(5): 425–430. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00475
|
| [46] | Carroll R, Ruigendijk E (2013) The effect of syntactic complexity on processing sentences in noise. J Psycholinguist Res 42(2): 139–59. doi: 10.1007/s10936-012-9213-7
|
| [47] | Altmann GTM (1998) Ambiguity in sentence processing. Trends Cogn Sci 2: 146–152. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01153-x
|
| [48] | Ben-David BM, Chambers CG, Danemana M, Pichora-Fuller MK, Reingold EM, et al. (2011) Effects of aging and noise on real-time spoken word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. J Speech Lang Hear Res 54: 243–262. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0233)
|
| [49] | Sherbecoe RL, Studebaker GA (2004) Supplementary formulas and tables for calculating and interconverting speech recognition scores in transformed arcsine units. Int J Audiol 43: 442–448. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050056
|
| [50] | Wingfield A, Tun PA (2007) Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. J Am Ac Audiol 18(7): 548–558. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.7.3
|
| [51] | Piquado T, Isaacowitz D, Wingfield A (2010) Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. Psychophysiology 47: 560–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00947.x
|
| [52] | Marzinzik M (2000) Noise reduction schemes for digital hearing aids and their use for the hearing impaired. [dissertation], Oldenburg: Carl von Ossietzky Universit？t, 132 p.
|
| [53] | Fredelake S, Holube I, Schlüter A, Hansen M (2012) Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms. Int J Audiol 51(4): 299–308. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.645075
|
| [54] | Bentler RA (2005) Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: A systematic review of the evidence. J Am Ac Audiol 16(7): 473–484. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.7.7
|
| [55] | Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA (2013) Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort. Ear Hear 34(1): 29–41. doi: 10.1097/aud.0b013e31825f299f
|
| [56] | Sarampalis A, Kalluri S, Edwards B, Hafter E (2009) Objective measures of listening effort: Effects of background noise and noise reduction. J Speech Lang Hear Res 52: 1230–1240. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0111)
|
| [57] | Schlueter A, Lemke U, Kollmeier B, Holube I (2014) Intelligibility of time-compressed speech: The effect of uniform versus non-uniform time-compression algorithms. J Acoust Soc Am 135(3): 1541–1555. doi: 10.1121/1.4863654
|
