Detecting and monitoring forest degradation in the tropics has implications for various fields of interest (biodiversity, emission calculations, self-sustenance of indigenous communities, timber exploitation). However, remote-sensing-based detection of forest degradation is difficult, as these subtle degradation signals are not easy to detect in the first place and quickly lost over time due to fast re-vegetation. To overcome these shortcomings, a time series analysis has been developed to map and monitor forest degradation over a longer period of time, with frequent updates based on Landsat data. This time series approach helps to reduce both the commission and the omission errors compared to, e.g., bi- or tri-temporal assessments. The approach involves a series of pre-processing steps, such as geometric and radiometric adjustments, followed by spectral mixture analysis and classification of spectral curves. The resulting pixel-based classification is then aggregated to degradation areas. The method was developed on a study site in Cameroon and applied to a second site in Central African Republic. For both areas, the results were finally evaluated against visual interpretation of very high-resolution optical imagery. Results show overall accuracies in both study sites above 85% for mapping degradation areas with the presented methods.
References
[1]
Nepstad, D.C.; Verissimo, A.; Alencar, A.; Nobre, C.; Lima, E.; Lefebvre, P.; Schlesinger, P.; Potter, C.; Moutinho, P.; Mendoza, E. Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature 1999, 398, 505–508.
[2]
Collomb, J.-G.; Mikissa, J.-B.; Minnemeyer, S.; Mundunga, S.; Nzao, N.H.; Madouma, J.; de Mapaga, J.D.; Mikolo, C.; Rabenkogo, N.; Akagah, S.; et al. First look at logging in Gabon. Available online: http://www.globalforestwatch.org/common/gabon/english/report.pdf (accessed on 24 April 2012).
[3]
Cochrane, M.A.; Skole, D.L.; Matricardi, E.A.T.; Barber, C.; Chomentowski, W. Selective Logging, Forest Fragmentation and Fire Disturbance: Implications of Interaction and Synergy for Conservation. In Working Forests in the Neotropics: Conservation through Sustainable Management; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 301–324.
[4]
Nasi, R.; VanVliet, N. Case Studies on Measuring and Assessing Forest Degradation: Defaunation and Forest Degradation in Central African Logging Concession: How to Measure the Impacts of Bushmeat Hunting on the Ecosystem. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/k7178e/k7178e00.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2013).
[5]
Potapov, P.; Yaroshenko, A.; Turubanova, S.; Dubinin, M.; Laestadius, L.; Thies, C.; Aksenov, D.; Egorov, A.; Yesipova, Y.; Glushkov, I.; et al. Mapping the world’s intact forest landscapes by remote sensing. Ecol. Soc 2008, 13, 51.
[6]
FAO. Forests and Climate Change Working Paper. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/009/j9345e/j9345e08.htm (accessed on 21 December 2013).
[7]
GOFC-GOLD (Global Observation of Forest and Land Cover Dynamics). A Sourcebook of Methods and Procedures for Monitoring and Reporting Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals Associated with Deforestation, Gains and Losses of Carbon Stocks in Forests Remaining Forests, and Forestation; GOFC-GOLD Land Cover Project Office, Wageningen University: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2012.
[8]
Stone, T.A.; Lefebvre, P. Using multi-temporal satellite data to evaluate selective logging in Para, Brazil. Int. J. Remote Sens 1998, 19, 2517–2526.
[9]
Duveiller, G.; Defourny, P.; Desclée, B.; Mayaux, P. Deforestation in central africa: Estimates at regional, national and landscape levels by advanced processing of systematically-distributed landsat extracts. Remote Sens. Environ 2008, 112, 1969–1981.
[10]
Laporte, N.T.; Stabach, J.A.; Grosch, R.; Lin, T.S.; Goetz, S.J. Expansion of industrial logging in Central Africa—Supporting online material. Science 2007, doi:10.1126/science.1141057.
[11]
de Wasseige, C.; Defourny, P. Remote sensing of selective logging impact for tropical forest management. For. Ecol. Manag 2004, 188, 161–173.
[12]
Deutscher, J.; Perko, R.; Gutjahr, K.; Hirschmugl, M.; Schardt, M. Mapping tropical rainforest canopy disturbances in 3D by COSMO-SkyMed spotlight InSAR-Stereo data to detect areas of forest degradation. Remote Sens 2013, 5, 648–663.
[13]
Asner, G.P.; Knapp, D.E.; Cooper, A.N.; Bustamente, M.M.C.; Olander, L.P. Ecosystem structure throughout the Brazilian Amazon from Landsat observations and automated spectral unmixing. Earth Interact 2005, 9, 1–31.
[14]
Souza, C.M.; Roberts, D.A.; Cochrane, M.A. Combining spectral and spatial information to map canopy damage from selective logging and forest fires. Remote Sens. Environ 2005, 98, 329–343.
[15]
Asner, G.P.; Keller, M.; Pereira, R.; Zweede, J.C. Remote sensing of selective logging in Amazonia assessing limitations based on detailed field observations, Landsat ETM+, and textural analysis. Remote Sens. Environ 2002, 80, 483–496.
[16]
Souza, C.M.; Roberts, D.A.; Monteiro, A.L. Multitemporal analysis of degraded forests in the Southern Brazilian Amazon. Earth Interact 2005, 9, 1–25.
Asner, G.P.; Hicke, J.A.; Lobell, D.B. Per-Pixel Analysis of Forest Structure: Vegetation Indices, Spectral Mixture Analysis and Canopy Reflectance Modeling. In Remote Sensing of Forest Environments: Concepts and Case Studies; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 209–254.
[19]
Al Mohamed, I. Erfassung und Bewertung von degradierten B？den mit Fernerkundung und GIS in Nordwest-SyrienPh.D. Thesis. Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany, 2011.
[20]
Matricardi, E.A.T.; Skole, D.L.; Pedlowski, M.A.; Chomentowski, W.; Fernandes, L.C. Assessment of tropical forest degradation by selective logging and fire using landsat imagery. Remote Sens. Environ 2010, 114, 1117–1129.
[21]
Thenkabail, P.S.; Enclona, E.A.; Ashton, M.S.; Legg, C.; de Dieu, M.J. Hyperion IKONOS, ALI, and ETM+ sensors in the study of African rainforests. Remote Sens. Environ 2004, 90, 23–43.
[22]
Ponzoni, F.J.; Galvao, L.S.; Liesenberg, V.; Santos, J.R. Impact of multi-angular CHRIS/PROBA data on their empirical relationships with tropical forest biomass. Int. J. Remote Sens 2010, 31, 5257–5273.
[23]
Souza, C.; Barreto, P. An alternative approach for detecting and monitoring selectively logged forests in the Amazon. Int. J. Remote Sens 2000, 21, 173–179.
[24]
Asner, G.P. The Carnegie Landsat Analysis System (Version 1.0 21); Asner Lab: Stanford, CA, USA, 2005.
[25]
Haas, S. Monitoring Forest Degradation for Redd in CameroonM.sc. Thesis. University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2009.
[26]
Sanderson, E.W.; Jaiteh, M.; Levy, M.A.; Redford, K.H.; Wannebo, A.V.; Woolmer, G. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 2002, 52, 891–904.
[27]
Bontemps, S.; Langner, A.; Defourny, P. Monitoring forest changes in borneo on a yearly basis by an object-based change detection algorithm using spot-vegetation time series. Int. J. Remote Sens 2012, 33, 4673–4699.
[28]
Verbesselt, J.; Zeileis, A.; Herold, M. Near real-time disturbance detection using satellite image time series: Drought detection in Somalia. Remote Sens. Environ 2012, 123, 98–108.
[29]
Koltunov, A.; Ustin, S.L.; Asner, G.P.; Fung, I. Selective logging changes forest phenology in the Brazilian Amazon: Evidence from MODIS image time series analysis. Remote Sens. Environ 2009, 113, 2431–2440.
[30]
Eklundh, L.; Johansson, T.; Solberg, S. Mapping insect defoliation in Scots pine with MODIS time-series data. Remote Sens. Environ 2009, 113, 1566–1573.
[31]
Jin, S.; Sader, S.A. MODIS time-series imagery for forest disturbance detection and quantification of patch size effects. Remote Sens. Environ 2005, 99, 462–470.
[32]
Margono, B.A.; Turubanova, S.; Zhuravleva, I.; Potapov, P.; Tyukavina, A.; Baccini, A.; Goetz, S.; Hansen, M.C. Mapping and monitoring deforestation and forest degradation in sumatra (Indonesia) using Landsat time series data sets from 1990 to 2010. Environ. Res. Lett 2012, 7, 1–16.
[33]
Healey, S.; Moisen, R.; Masek, J.; Cohen, W.; Goward, S.; Powell, S.; Nelson, M.; Jacobs, D.; Lister, A.; Kennedy, R.; et al. Measurement of Forest Disturbance and Regrowth with Landsat and Forest Inventory and Analysis Data: Anticipated Benefits from Forest and Inventory Analysis? Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium, Portland, OR, USA, 3–6 October 2005; pp. 171–178.
[34]
Kennedy, R.E.; Cohen, W.B.; Schroeder, T.A. Trajectory-based change detection for automated characterization of forest disturbance dynamics. Remote Sens. Environ 2007, 110, 370–386.
[35]
Kennedy, R.E.; Yang, Z.; Cohen, W.B. Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr—Temporal segmentation algorithms. Remote Sens. Environ 2010, 114, 2897–2910.
[36]
Huang, C.; Goward, S.N.; Masek, J.G.; Thomas, N.; Zhu, Z.; Vogelmann, J.E. An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks. Remote Sens. Environ 2010, 114, 183–198.
[37]
Brooks, E.B.; Wynne, R.H.; Thomas, V.A.; Blinn, C.E.; Coulston, J.W. On-the-fly massively multitemporal change detection using statistical quality control charts and landsat data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 2013, 1–17.
[38]
Zhu, Z.; Woodcock, C.E.; Olofsson, P. Continuous monitoring of forest disturbance using all available Landsat imagery. Remote Sens. Environ 2012, 122, 75–91.
[39]
Mertens, B.; Steil, M.; Nsoyuni, L.A.; Shu, G.N.; Minnemeyer, S. Interactive Forestry Atlas of Cameroon (Version 2.0). http://www.wri.org/publication/interactive-forestry-atlas-cameroon-version-2-0 (accessed on 16 February 2009).
[40]
Verhegghen, A.; Mayaux, P.; de Wasseige, C.; Defourny, P. Mapping Congo Basin vegetation types from 300 m and 1 km multi-sensor time series for carbon stocks and forest areas estimation. Biogeosciences 2012, 9, 5061–5079.
[41]
GSE FM REDD (GMES Service Elements for Forest Monitoring—Extensions for REDD). Available online: http://www.redd-services.info/content/gse-fm-redd (accessed on 21 December 2013).
[42]
Schmitt, U.; Deutscher, J. Integration to REDD Toolbox. GSE-REDD-TN1-RT-Ph2;; Joanneum Research: Graz, Austria, 2012.
[43]
Pereira, R.; Zweede, J.; Asner, G.P.; Keller, M. Forest canopy damage and recovery in reduced-impact and conventional selective logging in eastern Para, Brazil. For. Ecol. Manag 2002, 168, 77–89.
[44]
Asner, G.P.; Keller, M.; Pereira, R.; Zweede, J.C.; Silva, J.N.M. Canopy damage and recovery after selective logging in Amazonia: Field and satellite studies. Ecol. Appl 2004, 14, 280–298.
[45]
Fichet, L.; Sannier, C. Development of an Operational System for Monitoring Forest Cover at National Scale in 1990, 2000 and 2010. Proceedings of the XV Symposium SELPER, Cayenne, France, 19–23 November 2012.
[46]
Bossard, M.; Feranec, J.; Otahel, J. CORINE Land Cover Technical Guide—Addedum 2000; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000.
