This study investigated whether the prenatal maternal environment in dairy cattle influences the postnatal milking performance of the resulting daughters and grand-daughters. Linear mixed models were used to analyse whole season milk production from ~46000 Jersey and ~123000 Holstein Friesian cows in their 1st and 2nd lactations. Variation in the prenatal environment was associated with a small but significant (P<0.05) proportion of the total phenotypic variation (0.010 to 0.015) in all traits in Holstein Friesian cows and in the first lactation milk volume (0.011) and milk protein (0.011), and the second lactation milk fat (0.015) in the Jersey breed. This indicates that the prenatal environment does influence the adult performance of the subsequent daughter. Associations between daughter performance and dam and grand-dam traits indicative of their prenatal environment were also estimated. A one litre increase in the dam’s herd test milk volume was associated with a 7.5 litre increase in the daughters’ whole season milk yield and a 1% increase in either the dams’ herd test milk fat or protein percentage was associated with a reduction in daughter whole season milk volume (?49.6 and ?45.0 litres for dam fat and protein, respectively). Similar results between the grand-dam herd test traits ansd the daughters’ whole season milk production were observed with a 1% increase in either grand-dam milk fat or protein percentage associated with a reduction in daughter whole season milk yield (?34.7 and ?9.7 litres for fat and protein, respectively). This study revealed that the prenatal environment of the dam and the grand-dam can influence milk production in the subsequent daughters, though the effects are small. The similarity of the results between the dam daughter and the grand-dam daughter analyses suggests that the majority of the prenatal maternal effects are mediated by epigenetic mechanisms.
References
[1]
Berry DP, Lonergan P, Butler ST, Cromie AR, Fair T, et al. (2008) Negative influence of high maternal milk production before and after conception on offspring survival and milk production in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 91: 329–337. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0438
[2]
Gonzalez-Recio O, Ugarte E, Bach A (2012) Transgenerational effect of maternal lactation during pregnancy: a Holstein cow model. PLOS One 7: 1–7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051816
[3]
Banos G, Brotherstone S, Coffey MP (2007) Prenatal Maternal Effects on Body Condition Score, Female Fertility, and Milk Yield of Dairy Cows. J Dairy Sci 90: 3490–3499. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-809
[4]
Erdman RA, Arias JA, Quinn-Walsh E, Fisher P, Stelwagen K, et al.. (2009). Putative in utero epigenetic impacts of dam lactation yield and tissue energy stores on daughter first lactation milk production in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 92 (E-Suppl 1): i.
[5]
Singh K, Erdman RA, Swanson KM, Molenaar AJ, Maqbool NJ, et al. (2010) Epigenetic regulation of milk production in dairy cows. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 15: 101–112. doi: 10.1007/s10911-010-9164-2
[6]
Park CS (2005) Role of compensatory mammary growth in epigenetic control of gene expression. Faseb J 19: 1586–1591. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-3816hyp
[7]
Singh K, Molenaar AJ, Swanson KM, Gudex BW, Arias JA, et al. (2011) Epigenetics: a possible role in acute and transgenerational regulation of dairy cow milk production. Animal 6: 375–381. doi: 10.1017/s1751731111002564
[8]
Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Beedle AS (2007) Non-genomic transgenerational inheritance of disease risk. BioEssays 29: 145–154. doi: 10.1002/bies.20522
[9]
Daxinger L, Whitelaw E (2012) Understanding transgenerational epigenetic inheritance via the gametes in mammals. Nat Rev Genet 13: 153–162. doi: 10.1038/nrg3188
[10]
Pryce JE, Harris BL (2006) Genetics of body condition score in New Zealand dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 89: 4442–4432. doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72490-0
[11]
Roche JR, Lee JM, Berry DP (2006) Pre-conception energy balance and secondary sex ratio – partial support for the Travers – Willard hypothesis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 89: 2119–2125. doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72282-2
[12]
Gudex BW, Johnson DL, Singh K (2012) Prenatal maternal effects on daughter milk production in New Zealand Dairy Cattle. Proc NZ Soc Ani Prod 72: 19–22.
[13]
Johnson DL (1996) Estimation of lactation yield from repeated measures of test day yields. Proc NZ Soc Ani Prod 56: 16–18.
[14]
Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R (2009) ASReml Reference Manual. New South Wales Agriculture, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange, NSW, Australia.
[15]
Veenendaal MVE, Painter RC, de RooijSR, Bossuyt PMM, van der Post JAM, et al. (2013) Transgenerational effects of prenatal exposure to the 1944–45 Dutch famine. BJOG 120: 548–554. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12136
[16]
Pembrey ME, Byren LO, Kaati G, Edvinsson S, Northstone K, et al. (2006) Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans. Eur J Hum Gen 14: 159–166. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201538
[17]
Gonzalez-Recio O (2012) Epigenetics: a new challenge in the post genomic era of livestock. Front Genet 2: 106 (4 pages).. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2011.00106
[18]
Barker DJP, Gluckman PD, Godfrey KM, Harding JE, Owens JA, et al. (1993) Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet 341: 938–941. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91224-a