Wildfire management in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) protects property and life from wildland fire. One approach that has potential to provide information about the amount and location of fuels to forest managers and, at the same time, increase public knowledge and engagement in reducing wildfire threats is public participation in scientific research (PPSR)—also known as citizen science—where members of the public participate in the research process. In this exploratory study, residents of a wildfire-affected community tested a smartphone application to collect data about forest fuels and answered questions about wildfire, their community, and experiences using the application. In this paper, the application is introduced, the volunteers’ motivations, attitudes, and behaviors are considered, and the potential of using a PPSR approach for wildfire management discussed. Although there are practical challenges to applying PPSR approaches to wildfire hazard management, the participants in this study demonstrated the potential of PPSR to increase awareness and understanding of actions that can reduce the threat of wildfire. Wildfire managers may consider utilizing PPSR approaches to engage the community in wildfire preparedness.
References
[1]
Radeloff, V.C.; Hammer, R.B.; Stewart, S.I.; Fried, J.S.; Holcomb, S.S.; McKeefry, J.F. The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15, 799–805, doi:10.1890/04-1413.
Keane, R.E.; Burgan, R.; van Wagtendonk, J.W. Mapping wildland fuels for fire management across multiple scales: Integrating remote sensing, GIS, and biophysical modeling. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2001, 10, 301–319, doi:10.1071/WF01028.
[4]
Cohen, J. Preventing disaster: Home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface. J. For. 2000, 98, 15–21.
[5]
Partners-in-Protection. FireSmart manual for homeowners. Available online: http://www.embc.gov.bc.ca/ofc/interface/pdf/homeowner-firesmart.pdf (Accessed on 27 March 2013).
[6]
Monroe, M.; Pennisi, L.; McCaffry, S.; Mileti, D. Social Science to Improve Fuels Management: A Synthesis of Research Relevant to Communicating with Homeowners about Fuels Management; US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, North Central Research Station: St. Paul, MA, USA, 2006.
[7]
Olsen, C.S.; Shindler, B.A. Trust, acceptance, and citizen-agency interactions after large fires: Influences on planning processes. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2010, 19, 137–147, doi:10.1071/WF08168.
[8]
Shirk, J.L.; Ballard, H.L.; Wilderman, C.C.; Phillips, T.; Wiggins, A.; Jordan, R.; McCallie, E.; Minarchek, M.; Lewenstein, B.V.; Krasny, M.E.; et al. Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17, 29.
[9]
Cooper, C.B.; Dickinson, J.; Phillips, T.; Bonney, R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12, 11.
[10]
Bonney, R.; Dhondt, A. FeederWatch: An Example of Student-Scientist Partnership. In Internet Links for Science Education: Student—Scientist Partnerships; Cohen, K.C., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 31–53.
[11]
Sullivan, B.L.; Wood, C.L.; Iliff, M.J.; Bonney, R.E.; Fink, D.; Kelling, S. eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142, 2282–2292, doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.006.
[12]
Parkinson, T.; Force, J.; Smith, J. Hands on learning: Its effectiveness in teaching the public about wildland fire. J. For. 2003, 101, 21–26.
[13]
Toman, E.; Shindler, B.; Brunson, M. Fire and fuel management communication strategies: Citizen evaluations of agency outreach activities. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2006, 19, 321–336, doi:10.1080/08941920500519206.
[14]
Ferster, C.; Coops, N. A review of earth observation using mobile personal communication devices. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 51, 339–349, doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.009.
[15]
Lane, N.; Miluzzo, E.; Lu, H.; Peebles, D.; Choudhury, T.; Campbell, A. A survey of mobile phone sensing. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2010, 48, 140–150.
[16]
Powell, J.; Nash, G.; Bell, P. GeoExposures: Documenting temporary geological exposures in great britain through a citizen-science web site. Proc. Geol. Assoc. 2012, 124, 638–647, doi:10.1016/j.pgeola.2012.04.004.
[17]
Weng, Y.-H.; Sun, F.-S.; Grigsby, J.D. GeoTools: An android phone application in geology. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 44, 24–30, doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.027.
[18]
Pratihast, A.K.; Herold, M.; Avitabile, V.; de Bruin, S.; Bartholomeus, H.; Souza, C.M.; Ribbe, L. Mobile devices for community-based REDD+ monitoring: A case study for central vietnam. Sensors 2012, 13, 21–38, doi:10.3390/s130100021.
[19]
Cross, R. Wildfire Apps for iPhone and Android. 2013. Available online: http://www.redcross.org/mobile-apps/wildfire-app (Accessed on 20 June 2013).
[20]
Moskell, C.; Allred, S.B.; Ferenz, G. Examining motivations and recruitment strategies for urban forestry volunteers. Cities Environ. 2010, 3, 1–28.
[21]
Clary, E.G.; Snyder, M.; Ridge, R.D.; Copeland, J.; Stukas, A.A.; Haugen, J.; Miene, P. Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 74, 1516–1530, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516.
[22]
Sikkink, P.G.; Keane, R.E. A comparison of five sampling techniques to estimate surface fuel loading in montane forests. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2008, 17, 363–379, doi:10.1071/WF07003.
[23]
Morrow, B.; Johnston, K.; Davies, J. Rating Interface Wildfire Threats in British Columbia; BC Ministry of Forests and Range Protection Branch: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2008.
[24]
Cooper, C.B.; Dickinson, J.L.; Phillips, T.; Bonney, R. Science explicitly for nonscientists. Ecol. Soc. 2008, 13, r1.
[25]
Sauer, J.; Link, W.; Nichols, J.; Royle, J. Using the North American Breeding Bird Survey as a tool for conservation: A critique of Bart et al. (2004). J. Wildl. Manag. 2005, 69, 1321–1326, doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1321:UTNABB]2.0.CO;2.
[26]
Dickinson, J.L.; Zuckerberg, B.; Bonter, D.N. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2010, 41, 149–172, doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636.
[27]
Brabham, D.C. The myth of amatuer crowds. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2012, 15, 394–410, doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.641991.
[28]
Haklay, M.; Basiouka, S.; Antoniou, V.; Ather, A. How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? The validity of linus’ law to volunteered geographic information. Cartogr. J. 2010, 47, 315–322, doi:10.1179/000870410X12911304958827.
[29]
Meier, P. Crisis mapping in action: How open source software and global volunteer networks are changing the world, one map at a time. J. Map Geogr. Libr. 2012, 8, 89–100, doi:10.1080/15420353.2012.663739.
[30]
Han, K.; Graham, E.A.; Vassallo, D.; Estrin, D. Enhancing Motivation in a Mobile Participatory Sensing Project through Gaming. In Proceedings of 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing, Boston, MA, USA, 9–11 October 2011; pp. 1443–1448.
[31]
Iacovides, I.; Jennett, C.; Cornish-Trestrail, C.; Cox, A.L. Do Games Attract or Sustain Engagement in Citizen Science? In Proceedings of CHI EA ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems on-CHI EA ’13, Paris, France, 27 April–2 May 2013; pp. 1101–1106.
McFarlane, B.L.; McGee, T.K.; Faulkner, H. Complexity of homeowner wildfire risk mitigation: An integration of hazard theories. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2011, 20, 921–931, doi:10.1071/WF10096.
[34]
Price, C.A.; Lee, H.-S. Changes in participants’ scientific attitudes and epistemological beliefs during an astronomical citizen science project. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2013, 50, 773–801, doi:10.1002/tea.21090.
[35]
Shindler, B.A.; Toman, E.; McCaffrey, S.M. Public perspectives of fire, fuels and the Forest Service in the Great Lakes Region: A survey of citizen-agency communication and trust. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2009, 18, 157–164, doi:10.1071/WF07135.
[36]
Michener, W.K.; Jones, M.B. Ecoinformatics: Supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27, 85–93, doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.016.
