The Impact of Industrial Context on Procurement, Management and Development of Harvesting Services: A Comparison of Two Swedish Forest Owners Associations
Increasing demands to harvesting production and quality require improved management practices. This study’s purpose was to analyze the impact of industrial context on procurement, management, and development of harvesting services. Using interviews, functions were modeled at two forest owners associations (FOAs) with outsourced harvesting services. One FOA had its own sawmills, requiring frequent harvesting production adjustments to meet varying volume demand in the short-term. The long-term uncertainty was however low because of good visibility of future demand (>6 months). The other FOA did not own mills and produced wood according to fixed six-month delivery contracts. This meant few short-term production adjustments, but long-term uncertainty due to low visibility of future demand. Demand uncertainty resulted in corresponding needs for harvesting capacity flexibility. This could have been met by a corresponding proportion of short-term contracts for capacity. In this study, however, a large proportion (>90%) of long-term contracts was found, motivated by a perceived contractor shortage. It was also noted that although contractor investment cycles (4–6 years) matched the FOAs’ strategic horizons (3–5 years), contractors’ investment plans were not considered in the FOAs’ strategic planning. The study concludes with a characterization of different FOA contexts and their corresponding needs for capacity flexibility.
References
[1]
NRA Sweden. A National Strategic Research Agenda (NRA) for the Forest-Based Sector in Sweden; The Swedish National Support Group: Stockholm, Sweden, 2006.
[2]
Brunberg, T. Skogsbrukets kostnader och int？kter 2011 [Forestry Costs and Revenue 2011]; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2012. (in Swedish).
[3]
Ager, B. Skogsarbetets rationalisering och humanisering 1900–2011 och fram？t [The Rationalization and Humanization of Forest Work 1900–2011 and Forward]; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Ume？, Sweden, 2012. (in Swedish)..
[4]
Nordfjell, T.; Bjorheden, R.; Thor, M.; W？sterlund, I. Changes in technical performance, mechanical availability and prices of machines used in forest operations in Sweden from 1985 to 2010. Scand. J. Forest Res. 2010, 25, 382–389, doi:10.1080/02827581.2010.498385.
[5]
H？gn？s, T. Towards Supplier Partnerships in Timber Harvesting and Transportation; Mets？hallitus: Vantaa, Finland, 2000.
[6]
Hult？ker, O. Entrepren？rskap i skogsdrivningsbranschen: En kvalitativ studie om utveckling i sm？ f？retag [Entrepreneurship in the forest harvesting industry: A qualitative study of development in small enterprises]. Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 2006. (in Swedish).
[7]
Berlin, C. Forest Owner Characteristics and Implications for the Forest Owner Cooperative. Licentiate Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ume？, Sweden, 2006.
[8]
Swedish Forest Agency. Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2012; Swedish Forest Agency: J？nk？ping, Sweden, 2013.
[9]
Nollet, J.; Ponce, S.; Campbell, M. About “strategy” and “strategies” in supply management. J. Purch. Supply Manage. 2005, 11, 129–140, doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2005.10.007.
[10]
Lapierre, J. Customer-perceived value in industrial contexts. J. Bus. Ind. Marketing. 2000, 15, 122–140, doi:10.1108/08858620010316831.
[11]
Teece, D.J. Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Plann. 2000, 33, 35–54, doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00117-X.
[12]
H？ggstr？m, C.; Kawasaki, A.; Lidestav, G. Profiles of forestry contractors and development of the forestry-contracting sector in Sweden. Scand. J. Forest Res. 2013, 28, 395–404, doi:10.1080/02827581.2012.738826.
[13]
Norin, K. Upphandling och f？rs？ljning av entreprenadtj？nster i skogsbruket-en diskussion om aff？rskoncept som st？der drivningssystemens utveckling [Forestry-Contractor Services-Buying and Selling: A Discussion of Business Approaches that Support Developments in Logging Systems]; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2002. (in Swedish).
[14]
Bergquist, E. Varf？r L？mnar Skogsmaskinf？rare Branschen? [Why do Forest Machine Operators Leave the Forest Industry?]; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Ume？, Sweden, 2009. (in Swedish).
[15]
Rummukainen, A.; Dahlin, B.; Penttinen, M.; Selby, A.; Mikkola, J. Challenges to the forest machine business as a result of global economic change. In Forest, Wildlife and Wood Sciences for Society Development, Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, 16–18 April 2009.
[16]
Penttinen, M.; Rummukainen, A.; Mikkola, J. Profitability, liquidity and solvency of wood harvesting contractors in Finland. Small Scale For. 2011, 10, 211–229, doi:10.1007/s11842-010-9143-x.
[17]
Vining, A.; Globerman, S. A conceptual framework for understanding the outsourcing decision. Eur. Manage. J. 1999, 17, 645–654, doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00055-9.
[18]
Arnold, U. New dimensions of outsourcing: A combination of transaction cost economics and the core competencies concept. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manage. 2000, 6, 23–29, doi:10.1016/S0969-7012(99)00028-3.
[19]
Quélin, B.; Duhamel, F. Bringing together strategic outsourcing and corporate strategy: outsourcing motives and risks. Eur. Manage. J. 2003, 21, 647–661, doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00113-0.
Cousins, P.D. The alignment of approriate firm and supply strategies for competitive advantage. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Man. 2005, 25, 403–428, doi:10.1108/01443570510593120.
[22]
Carlsson, D.; R？nnqvist, M. Supply chain management in forestry—Case studies at S？dra Cell AB. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2005, 163, 589–616, doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.001.
[23]
Uusitalo, J. A framework for CTL method-based wood procurement logistics. Int. J. For. Eng. 2005, 16, 37–46.
[24]
Audy, J.-F.; Pinotti Moreira, M.; Westlund, K.; D’Amours, S.; LeBel, L.; R？nnqvist, M. Alternative Logistics Concepts Fitting Different Wood Supply Situations and Markets; Interuniversity Research Centre: Québec City, Canada, 2012.
[25]
Tap, S.D.; Ganesan, S. Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. J. Marketing Res. 2000, 37, 227–245, doi:10.1509/jmkr.37.2.227.18735.
[26]
Furness-Lindén, A. Aff？rsutveckling i relationen stor kund/liten leverant？r—Vad kan skogsbruket l？ra? [Business Development: Large Customer-Small Supplier Relations. What Can Forestry Learn from the Process?]; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2008. (in Swedish).
[27]
Norin, K.; Furness-Lindén, A. V？gar till professionell upphandling av tj？nster i skogsbruket—Erfarenheter, f？rslag och inspirationsk？lla [Ways to Improve the Procurement of Services in Forestry—Experience, Recommendations and Inspiration]; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2008. (in Swedish).
[28]
Robins Sadler, G.; Lee, H.-C.; Hwan-Lim, R.S.; Fullerton, J. Recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptions of the snowball sampling strategy. Nurs. Health Sci. 2010, 12, 369–374, doi:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00541.x.
[29]
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Integration Definition for Function Modeling (IDEF0); National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1993.
[30]
Noran, O.S. Business Modelling: UML vs. IDEF; Griffith University: Nathan, Australia, 2000.
[31]
Cascini, G.; Rissone, P.; Rotini, F. Business re-engineering through integration of methods and tools for process innovation. Proc. Inst. Mechanical Eng. Part. B: J. Eng. Manuf. 2008, 222, 1715–1728, doi:10.1243/09544054JEM1263.
[32]
Haapaniemi, M. En generell processkartl？ggning av leveransplanering f？r biobr？nsle i Sverige [A Generic Process Model for Delivery Scheduling of Biofuels in Sweden]; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Ume？, Sweden, 2011. (in Swedish).
[33]
Carlsson, D.; D’Amours, S.; Martel, A.; R？nnqvist, M. Supply chain planning models in the pulp and paper industry. Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 2009, 47, 167–183.
[34]
Andrén, M.; Fjeld, D. Information flow model for Swedish pulp wood supply. In Silva Carelica, Proceedings of the NSR Conference on Forest OperationsHyyti？l？ Forest Field Station, Hyyti？l？, Finland, 30–31 August 2004; Volume 45, pp. 150–158.
[35]
Kollberg, M. Beyond IT and Productivity—Effects of Digitized Information Flows in the Logging Industry. Licentiate Thesis, Link？ping University, Link？ping, Sweden, 2005.
[36]
Brunberg, T.; Lundstr？m, H. R？tt maskinval i gallring—Studie vid SCA skog [Smallest Harvester Cost-Effective in Small-Diameter Thinnings; Medium-Duty Harvester Best in Somewhat Larger Stands]; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2010. (in Swedish).
[37]
D’Amours, S.; R？nnqvist, M.; Weintraub, A. Using operational research for supply chain planning in the forest products industry. Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 2008, 46, 265–281.
[38]
Bergkvist, I. Tv？skift ？r billigast, men l？ga r？ntor minskar gapet mot enkelskift [Two-Shift System Cheapest but Low Interest Rates are Closing the Single-Shift Gap]; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2010. (in Swedish).
[39]
Norin, K.; Karlsson, A. S？ arbetar en vinnare—Djupintervjuer med tio l？nsamma skogsentrepren？rer [What Makes a Winner? —Searching Interviews with 10 Successful Forestry Contractor Businesses]; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2010. (in Swedish).
[40]
Vestling, B. Kostnadsp？verkande faktorer f？r sk？rdare—En analys av uppf？ljningsdata hos Stora Enso Skog [Factors Influencing Costs for Harvesters—An Analysis of Follow-Up Data at Stora Enso Skog]; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Ume？, Sweden, 2012. (in Swedish).
[41]
Mayo, J.H.; Greene, W.D.; Clutter, M.L.; deHoop, N.; Egan, A.F. Causes and Costs of Unused Logging Production Capacity. In A Global Perspective, Proceedings of the Council on Forest Engineering (COFE) Conference, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA, 16–20 June 2002.
[42]
Spinelli, R.; Visser, R. Analyzing and estimating delays in harvester operations. Int. J. For. Eng. 2008, 19, 36–41.
[43]
M？rk, A.; Thorsén, T. Nyckelfaktorer f？r effektiva maskinlag [Key Factors for Improving Efficiency of Logging Teams]; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2011. (in Swedish).
[44]
Arlinger, J.; M？ller, J. Standard f？r Skotarrapportering—Viktig L？nk i Skogsbrukets Logistik [New Standard for Forwarder Reports—A Vital Link in Forestry Logistics]; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2006. (in Swedish).
[45]
Arlinger, J. Nya m？jligheter med StanForD 2010 [Updated Standard for Forest Machine Data-StanForD 2010]; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2011. (in Swedish).
[46]
Bjerner, J. Betydelsen av felaktig information i traktbanken—Inverkan p？ virkesleveranser samt tids？tg？ng och kostnad vid avverkningar [The Consequences of Erroneous Information in Stand Registers—Its Effect on Timber Delivieries and Harvesting Operations]; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Ume？, Sweden, 2004. (in Swedish).
[47]
Hultén, L.; Bolin, H. Information Exchange and Controllability in Logistics; Transport Research Institute: Stockholm, Sweden, 2002.
