The kitchen environment is one of the scenarios in the home where users can benefit from Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) applications. Moreover, it is the place where old people suffer from most domestic injuries. This paper presents a novel design, implementation and assessment of a Smart Kitchen which provides Ambient Assisted Living services; a smart environment that increases elderly and disabled people’s autonomy in their kitchen-related activities through context and user awareness, appropriate user interaction and artificial intelligence. It is based on a modular architecture which integrates a wide variety of home technology (household appliances, sensors, user interfaces, etc.) and associated communication standards and media (power line, radio frequency, infrared and cabled). Its software architecture is based on the Open Services Gateway initiative (OSGi), which allows building a complex system composed of small modules, each one providing the specific functionalities required, and can be easily scaled to meet our needs. The system has been evaluated by a large number of real users (63) and carers (31) in two living labs in Spain and UK. Results show a large potential of system functionalities combined with good usability and physical, sensory and cognitive accessibility.
References
[1]
Giannakouris, K. Ageing Characterises the Demographic Perspectives of the European Societies. Eurostat, Statistics in focus 72/2008. Available online: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-08-072/EN/KS-SF-08-072-EN.PDF (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[2]
Resident Population Projections by Sex and Age: 2010 to 2050. Available online: http://www.census.gov/ (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[3]
NIPSSR. Population Projections for Japan: 2001–2050 With Long-Range Population Projections: 2051–2100; NIPSSR: Tokyo, Japan, 2002.
[4]
Angermann, A.; Bauer, R.; Nossek, G.; Zimmermann, N. Injuries in the European Union. Statistics Summary 2003–2005; Austrian Road Safety Board: Vienna, Austria, 2007.
[5]
Easy Line + Project Website. Available online: http://www.easylineplus.com/ (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[6]
Aarts, E.; Wichert, R. Ambient Intelligence. In Technology Guide; Bullinger, H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 244–249.
[7]
Van Den Broek, G.; Cavallo, F.; Wehrmann, C. AALIANCE Ambient Assisted Living Roadmap; IOS Press: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2010.
[8]
O'Grady, M.J.; Muldoon, C.; Dragone, M.; Tynan, R.; O'Hare, G.M.P. Towards evolutionary ambient assisted living systems. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2010, 1, 15–29.
[9]
Falcó, J.; Vaquerizo, E.; Lain, L.; Artigas, J.; Ibarz, A. AmI and deployment considerations in AAL services provision for elderly independent living: The MonAMI project. Sensors 2013, 13, 8950–8976.
[10]
Mu？oz, A.; Serrano, E.; Villa, A.; Valdés, M.; Botía, J.A. An approach for representing sensor data to validate alerts in ambient assisted living. Sensors 2012, 12, 6282–6306.
[11]
Lei, J.; Ren, X.; Fox, D. Fine-Grained Kitchen Activity Recognition Using RGB-D. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 5–8 September 2012.
[12]
Suryadevara, N.K.; Mukhopadhyay, S.C. Wireless sensor network based home monitoring system for wellness determination of elderly. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 1965–1972.
[13]
Ficocelli, M.; Nejat, G. The design of an interactive assistive kitchen system. Assist. Technol. 2012, 24, 246–258.
[14]
Chen, J.H.; Chi, P.P.Y.; Chu, H.H.; Chen, C.C.H.; Huang, P. A smart kitchen for nutrition-aware cooking. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2010, 9, 58–65.
[15]
Frey, J.; Ne？elrath, R.; Stahl, C. An Open Standardized Platform for Dual Reality Applications. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) Workshop on Location Awareness for Mixed and Dual Reality LAMDa11, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 13–16 February 2011.
[16]
Ne？elrath, R.; Haupert, J.; Frey, J.; Brandherm, B. Supporting Persons with Special Needs in Their Daily Life in a Smart Home. Proceedings of the 2011 7th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE), Nottingham, UK, 25–28 July 2011; pp. 370–373.
[17]
Schwartze, V.; Feuerstack, S.; Albayrak, S. Behavior-Sensitive User Interfaces for Smart Environments. In Digital Human Modeling; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 305–314.
[18]
Bonanni, L.; Lee, C.; Selker, T. Counter Intelligence: Augmented Reality Kitchen. Proceedings of the CHI 2005, Portland, OR, USA, 2–7 April 2005; p. p. 44.
[19]
Intelligent Spoon. Counter Intelligence. MIT Media Lab. Available online: http://www.media.mit.edu/ci/projects/intelligentspoon.html (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[20]
Chameleon Mug. Counter Intelligence. MIT Media Lab. Available online: http://www.media.mit.edu/ci/projects/chameleonmug.html (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[21]
OSGi Alliance. Challenges for Todays Consumer Electronics and White Goods Manufacturers. 2010. Available online: http://www.osgi.org/wiki/uploads/Markets/Challenges%20for%20Todays20Consumer%20Electronics.pdf (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[22]
Wu, J.; Huang, L.; Wang, D.; Shen, F. R-OSGi-based architecture of distributed smart home system. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2008, 54, 1166–1172.
[23]
Li, X.; Zhang, W. The design and implementation of home network system using OSGi compliant middleware. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2004, 50, 528–534.
[24]
OSGi Alliance Website. Available online: http://www.osgi.org/Main/HomePage (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[25]
Universal AAL Website. Available online: http://universaal.org/index.php/en/ (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[26]
AAL Open Association—AALOA Website. Available online: http://www.aaloa.org/ (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[27]
Marco, A.; Casas, R.; Bauer, G.; Blasco, R.; Asensio, A.; Jean-Bart, B.; Iba？ez, M. Common Osgi Interface for Ambient Assisted Living Scenarios. In Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments.Volume 3: Behaviour Monitoring and Interpretation—BMI; IOS Press: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 336–357.
[28]
OSGi4AmI Project Website. Available online: http://sourceforge.net/projects/osgi4ami/ (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[29]
Casas, R.; Blasco, R.; Robinet, A.; Delgado, A.; Yarza, A.; McGinn, J.; Picking, R.; Grout, V. User Modelling in Ambient Intelligence for Elderly and Disabled People. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 114–122.
[30]
Cooper, A. The Inmates are Running the Asylum; AMS Publishing: Brooklyn, NY, USA, 2004.
[31]
USB-UIRT Home. Available online: http://www.usbuirt.com/ (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[32]
Ballantine, J.A.; Galliers, R.D.; Stray, S.J. Information systems/technology evaluation practices: Evidence from UK organizations. J. Inf. Technol. 1996, 11, 129–141.
[33]
Casas, R.; Marco, á; Falcó, J.; Artigas, J.; Abascal, J. Ethically Aware Design of a Location System for People with Dementia. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 777–784.
[34]
Nicolescu, B.; Camus, M.; Magnin, T.; Voss, K. Levels of Representation and Levels of Reality: Towards an Ontology of Science. In The Concept of Nature in Science and Theology; Labor Et Fides: Genève, Switzerland, 1994; pp. 94–103.
[35]
Demers, L.; Monette, M.; Lapierre, Y.; Arnold, D.; Wolfson, C. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disabil. Rehabil. 2002, 24, 21–30.
[36]
Day, H.; Jutai, J.; Campbell, K. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: Lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil. Rehabil. 2002, 24, 31–37.
[37]
Goodman, G.; Luft, P. Adoption of assistive technology for computer access among college students with disabilities. Disabil. Rehabil. 2002, 24, 80–92.
[38]
Shone, S.M.; Ryan, S.; Rigby, P.; Jutai, J.W. Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: Evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disabil. Rehabil. 2002, 24, 115–125.
[39]
Scherer, J.; Laura, A.; Cushman, M. Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: A validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Disabil. Rehabil. 2001, 23, 387–393.
[40]
Schalock, R.L.; Verdugo Alonso, M.A. Calidad De Vida: Manual Para Profesionales De La Educación, Salud Y Servicios Sociales; Alianza Editorial: Madrid, Spain, 2003.
[41]
Hasdo？an, G. The role of user models in product design for assessment of user needs. Des. Stud. 1996, 17, 19–33.
[42]
Lenker, J.A.; Paquet, V.L. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist. Technol. 2003, 15, 1–15.
[43]
Cook, A.M.; Hussey, S. Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. ed.; Mosby: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2001.
[44]
Scherer, M.J.; Craddock, G. Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process. Technol. Disabil. 2002, 14, 125–131.
[45]
Combessie, J.C. A propos de méthodes: Effets d'optique, heuristique et objectivation. Bull. Méthodol. Sociol. 1986, 10, 4–24.
[46]
Groger, L.; Straker, J. Counting and Recounting: Approaches to Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Data and Methods. In Qualitative Gerontology: A Contemporary Perspective; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 179–199.
[47]
Howe, K.R. Getting Over the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate. In American Journal of Education; The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA; pp. 236–256.
[48]
Jick, T.D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Adm. Sci. Q. 1979, 24, 602–611.
[49]
Rossi, P.H. The war between the quals and the quants: Is a lasting peace possible? New Dir. Program Eval. 1994, 1994, 23–36.
[50]
Morgan, D.L. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research; Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1997.
[51]
Teddlie, C.; Tashakkori, A. Major Issues and Controveries in the Use of Mixed Methods in the Social and Behvioral Sciences. In Major Issues and Controversies in the Use of Mixedmethods in the Social and Behavioral Sciences; Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2003; pp. 3–50.
[52]
Blasco, R.; Casas, R.; Falcó, J.L.; Grout, V.; Picking, R. D.7.2. Report with the Results of the End Users' Test. Easy Line Plus Project Public Deliverable. Available online: http://www.easylineplus.com/ (accessed on 3 October 2013).
[53]
Picking, R.; Grout, V.; Crisp, J.; Grout, H. Simplicity, Consistency, Universality and Familiarity: Applying ‘SCUF’ Principles to Technology for Assisted Living. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Designing Ambient Interactions for Older Users—Part of the 3rd European Conference on Ambient Intelligence, Salzburg, Austria, 18–21 November 2009.
